Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:20 am

Yet you STILL can't refute the OP... other than your usual "nuh uh!"

It's amazing how he can spew so much **** and say absolutely nothing. 

ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:23 am

He is in full evade mode...you will get nothing from him

I know.

That's his M.O.
 

*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 6:41 am

Just as many of us have been saying all along...

Biden Is Only ‘Adding’ Jobs Because Americans Need Extra Side Hustles To Make Ends Meet

Democrats claim that the economy added 303,000 jobs in March — but it added no full-time jobs at all in March. The economy actually shed 6,000 full-time jobs that month. In fact, full-time employment in the United States has dropped in each of the past four months. Since November, there are 1,787,000 fewer Americans with full-time employment.

Many Added Jobs Are Government Jobs

A shrinking full-time workforce and an increasing “moonlighting” workforce are, of course, signs of a troubled economy. But there’s more. Nearly 25 percent (71,000) of the so-called “added” jobs are government jobs. Since government employees make up about 15 percent of all workers, the March figures disproportionately “add” government jobs to “the economy.”

 https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/10/bi ... ends-meet/

You can't get job that are no availed. 


**** idiots

*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:21 am

Rico doesn't need links.

He just says, and it's so...

Just ask him.

The economy actually shed 6,000 full-time jobs that month

Where did your source find this number?

You wouldn't have a clue.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12500000


The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'


can we all agree that he is using the Household Survey?


**** peasants.

Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am

You can't get job that are no availed. 

**** idiots

Speak English please...
 

ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:23 am

He is in full evade mode...you will get nothing from him

Are you keeping up, Pissy?

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am

Where did your source find this number?

You wouldn't have a clue.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12500000

The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'

can we all agree that he is using the Household Survey?

**** peasants.

Does this change any of the numbers in the OP?

No, it doesn't.

nod



 
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am

Where did your source find this number?

You wouldn't have a clue.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12500000

The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'

can we all agree that he is using the Household Survey?

**** peasants.

@rippy 38  

@ConsRule  

@Huey  

@RebelGator  

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:14 am

Ignore the data...

Take this idiot's word for it.

You have shown NO data, idiot!!!  Show some data that disprove my data instead of your braindead biden dick sucking, you lying son-of-a-bitch!!!

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:30 am

Are you keeping up, Pissy?

Yep...so far you have evaded every request to dispell anything in the OP.  You know...your typical approach.
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:31 am

@rippy 38  

@ConsRule  

@Huey  

@RebelGator

Nobody said he wasn't.  Stop creating an argument that doesn't exist, Askholio.

Well I'm glad Biden created more jobs for Americans.

That's a good thing.

*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:31 am

Does this change any of the numbers in the OP?

No, it doesn't.

nod

Don't try to get ahead of it, you have no clue why it matters.

Do you acknowledge that your source is relying on the Household Survey, as asserted and conclusively demonstrated?
 

Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am

Well I'm glad Biden created more jobs for Americans.

That's a good thing.

Even if they are just part time **** jobs...

Bidenomics baby.
 

Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am

Nobody said he wasn't.  Stop creating an argument that doesn't exist, Askholio.

I'm glad American have more options on employment under Biden than under any other president ever. 

If they didn't have to because after every republican president their money doesnt go as far as it used to. 

 

Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am

Nobody said he wasn't.  Stop creating an argument that doesn't exist, Askholio.

Not now...in the retelling.

Now acknowledge.

 

*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:34 am

Even if they are just part time **** jobs...

Bidenomics baby.

You have no idea....

Your sources are hacks

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:37 am

Not now...in the retelling.

Now acknowledge.

**** off askholio.  If you have an issue with the two surveys take it up with the BLS and the Biden administration.  

Now acknowledge, Askholio. 

ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:33 am

Yep...so far you have evaded every request to dispell anything in the OP.  You know...your typical approach.

I have dispelled it and explained why.

You don't understand in spite of having long since been invited to inform yourself.

That you are as indolent as you are ignorant is not any of my doing.

Before I proceed, I require an acknowledgment.

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:29 am

Where did your source find this number?

You wouldn't have a clue.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12500000

The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'

can we all agree that he is using the Household Survey?

**** peasants.

Yes, it comes from a CPS

About this Survey (census.gov)

The Current Population Survey (CPS) is one of the oldest, largest, and most well-recognized surveys in the United States.  It is immensely important, providing information on many of the things that define us as individuals and as a society – our work, our earnings, and our education. In addition to being the primary source of monthly labor force statistics, the CPS is used to collect data for a variety of other studies that keep the nation informed of the economic and social well-being of its people.  This is done by adding a set of supplemental questions to the monthly basic CPS questions.  Supplemental inquiries vary month to month and cover a wide variety of topics such as child support, volunteerism, health insurance coverage, and school enrollment.  Supplements are usually conducted annually or biannually, but the frequency and recurrence of a supplement depend completely on what best meets the needs of the supplement’s sponsor.The CPS data collection has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Number 0607-0049).  Without this number, we could not conduct this survey.

Methodology (census.gov)

The Current Population Survey (CPS), sponsored jointly by the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is the primary source of labor force statistics for the population of the United States.

The CPS is administered by the Census Bureau using a probability selected sample of about 60,000 occupied households. The fieldwork is conducted during the calendar week that includes the 19th of the month. The questions refer to activities during the prior week; that is, the week that includes the 12th of the month. Households from all 50 states and the District of Columbia are in the survey for 4 consecutive months, out for 8, and then return for another 4 months before leaving the sample permanently. This design ensures a high degree of continuity from one month to the next (as well as over the year). The 4-8-4 sampling scheme has the added benefit of allowing the constant replenishment of the sample without excessive burden to respondents.

________________

As is the case with most liberals: when you don't like the numbers but cannot disprove them, find a way to attack the source.