Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Dispelling the "added jobs" myth.
Dispelling the "added jobs" myth.
By *rippy38
11 Apr 2024 6:41 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 Apr 2024 6:54 am
R.Suave » 12 Apr 2024, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑ Do you know many people working "hourly" at a rate of $250/hr?
Sometimes the stupid **** doesn't even make sense...
This one gets $400/hr...
https://youtu.be/Vq-EOkDO0bE
In memory of Pumpkins
12 Apr 2024 6:56 am
The graphic you posted wasn't exclusive to hourly employees.R.Suave » 12 Apr 2024, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑ Do you know many people working "hourly" at a rate of $250/hr?
Sometimes the stupid **** doesn't even make sense...
It displayed "average hourly earnings" in ALL private sector jobs, meaning salaried AND hourly positions.... which makes it irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
"Total Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private"
Go have a look... idiot.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 6:59 am
He doesn't even realize that the graphic he posted averages ALL private sector jobs... salaried, and hourly.
He's a fookin' tool.
LOL
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:00 am
Answer the question.*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ The graphic you posted wasn't exclusive to hourly employees.
It displayed "average hourly earnings" in ALL private sector jobs, meaning salaried AND hourly positions.... which makes it irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
"Total Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private"
Go have a look... idiot.
12 Apr 2024 7:03 am
Your question is irrelevant... just like your graphic was.
That's strike two dumb ***.
Put it into high spin mode Rico... your foundering on the rocks again.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:06 am
No questions, dickhead..
In memory of Pumpkins
12 Apr 2024 7:07 am
He lost this argument before it ever started.
He just couldn't help himself...
LOL
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:08 am
You're innumerate.*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Your question is irrelevant... just like your graphic was.
That's strike two dumb ***.
Less than 2% of the population makes 500k or more. To move the needle, they'd have to get MASSIVE raises.
The median salary is 59,000
12 Apr 2024 7:09 am
Only in your dreams.*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ He lost this argument before it ever started.
He just couldn't help himself...
LOL
12 Apr 2024 7:11 am
So?R.Suave » 12 Apr 2024, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ You're innumerate.
Less than 2% of the population makes 500k or more. To move the needle, they'd have to get MASSIVE raises.
The median salary is 59,000
That still doesn't make your graphic relevant to the OP or Huey's comment.
Spin on son... it's one thing you actually do well.
LOL
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:16 am
Twaddle.*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ So?
That still doesn't make your graphic relevant to the OP or Huey's comment.
Spin on son... it's one thing you actually do well.
LOL
It demonstrates that your argument is crap.
But there's more...
Now, please shut the **** up.
12 Apr 2024 7:17 am
Rebleat?*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ So?
That still doesn't make your graphic relevant to the OP or Huey's comment.
Spin on son... it's one thing you actually do well.
LOL
12 Apr 2024 7:18 am
Truth.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:22 am
LOLR.Suave » 12 Apr 2024, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ Twaddle.
It demonstrates that your argument is crap.
But there's more...
Now, please shut the **** up.
That's from the CPS, which you were saying was irrelevant earlier in this thread when the same tool was used to support the OP that you also said was junk.
I guess it only matters if it supports your narrative huh?
Either way, it still doesn't change the fact that the graphic you posted yesterday is irrelevant to the OP or Huey's comment.
That's strike three dumb ***.
Yer out!
Spin cycle on high Rico!
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:23 am
Sure...
https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... an-prices/
Data from November 2023 show that 57 percent of workers’ wages grew, on an annual basis, more quickly than inflation since November 2022. (see Figure 2) Three and a half years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, then, this share stands above its pre-pandemic (2017–2019) average. After the onset of the Great Recession, it took essentially six years—until the end of 2013—for a similar share of workers to begin seeing real annual wage raises. The share of workers of color who received an inflation-adjusted raise in November 2023 is identical to the share of workers overall.8
12 Apr 2024 7:26 am
Key paragraph from your source... with highlights for impact.R.Suave » 12 Apr 2024, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ Sure...
https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... an-prices/
Data from November 2023 show that 57 percent of workers’ wages grew, on an annual basis, more quickly than inflation since November 2022. (see Figure 2) Three and a half years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, then, this share stands above its pre-pandemic (2017–2019) average. After the onset of the Great Recession, it took essentially six years—until the end of 2013—for a similar share of workers to begin seeing real annual wage raises. The share of workers of color who received an inflation-adjusted raise in November 2023 is identical to the share of workers overall.8
The median inflation-adjusted change in workers’ hourly earnings was about 45 cents, which translates to a more than $900 annual increase for a worker who works full time, year-round.
Now go read the OP again and get back to me...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
12 Apr 2024 7:29 am
*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ LOL
That's from the CPS, which you were saying was irrelevant earlier in this thread when the same tool was used to support the OP that you also said was junk.
I guess it only matters if it supports your narrative huh?
Either way, it still doesn't change the fact that the graphic you posted yesterday is irrelevant to the OP or Huey's comment.
That's strike three dumb ***.
Yer out!
Spin cycle on high Rico!
You're lying.That's from the CPS, which you were saying was irrelevant earlier
And I showed you how.was used to support the OP that you also said was junk.
You ran from it.
Do you want to try again?
If the STATED threshold for statistical significance is +/- 600,000 (for a 90% confidence insterval), is 6,000 statistically significant?
If not, your citation's thesis is bunk.
12 Apr 2024 7:29 am
What point do you think you're making?*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ Key paragraph from your source... with highlights for impact.
The median inflation-adjusted change in workers’ hourly earnings was about 45 cents, which translates to a more than $900 annual increase for a worker who works full time, year-round.
Now go read the OP again and get back to me...
12 Apr 2024 7:44 am
So there must be a lot of people working part time "for economic reasons"...right?*rippy38 » 12 Apr 2024, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ Key paragraph from your source... with highlights for impact.
The median inflation-adjusted change in workers’ hourly earnings was about 45 cents, which translates to a more than $900 annual increase for a worker who works full time, year-round.
Now go read the OP again and get back to me...
12 Apr 2024 7:47 am
R.Suave » 12 Apr 2024, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑
You're lying.
And I showed you how.
You ran from it.
Do you want to try again?
If the STATED threshold for statistical significance is +/- 600,000 (for a 90% confidence insterval), is 6,000 statistically significant?
If not, your citation's thesis is bunk.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Who is online
In total there are 4434 users online :: 8 registered, 11 bots, and 4415 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, ROG62, jerra b, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Toddster Patriot, Cannonpointer, sole
Bots: proximic, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7