Don't divert, Tiny.Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ **** off askholio. If you have an issue with the two surveys take it up with the BLS and the Biden administration.
Now acknowledge, Askholio.
R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ I have dispelled it and explained why.
You don't understand in spite of having long since been invited to inform yourself.
That you are as indolent as you are ignorant is not any of my doing.
Before I proceed, I require an acknowledgment.
Us democrats are glad to provide employment at record numbers for Americans.ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, it comes from a CPS
About this Survey (census.gov)
The Current Population Survey (CPS) is one of the oldest, largest, and most well-recognized surveys in the United States. It is immensely important, providing information on many of the things that define us as individuals and as a society – our work, our earnings, and our education. In addition to being the primary source of monthly labor force statistics, the CPS is used to collect data for a variety of other studies that keep the nation informed of the economic and social well-being of its people. This is done by adding a set of supplemental questions to the monthly basic CPS questions. Supplemental inquiries vary month to month and cover a wide variety of topics such as child support, volunteerism, health insurance coverage, and school enrollment. Supplements are usually conducted annually or biannually, but the frequency and recurrence of a supplement depend completely on what best meets the needs of the supplement’s sponsor.The CPS data collection has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Number 0607-0049). Without this number, we could not conduct this survey.
Methodology (census.gov)
The Current Population Survey (CPS), sponsored jointly by the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is the primary source of labor force statistics for the population of the United States.
The CPS is administered by the Census Bureau using a probability selected sample of about 60,000 occupied households. The fieldwork is conducted during the calendar week that includes the 19th of the month. The questions refer to activities during the prior week; that is, the week that includes the 12th of the month. Households from all 50 states and the District of Columbia are in the survey for 4 consecutive months, out for 8, and then return for another 4 months before leaving the sample permanently. This design ensures a high degree of continuity from one month to the next (as well as over the year). The 4-8-4 sampling scheme has the added benefit of allowing the constant replenishment of the sample without excessive burden to respondents.
________________
As is the case with most liberals: when you don't like the numbers but cannot disprove them, find a way to attack the source.
R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ Don't divert, Tiny.
It's not about the surveys....it's how the hacks with their arms up your witless *** are using them.
Don't presume to educate me on this subject, clown.ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, it comes from a CPS
As is the case with most liberals: when you don't like the numbers but cannot disprove them, find a way to attack the source.

Oh my God we have jobs to provide Americans with and now you guys are saying having employment available is a bad thing.Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Well, make your case. State your issues in a clear and concise manner.
We had low unemployment under Trump.Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Oh my God we have jobs to provide Americans with and now you guys are saying having employment available is a bad thing.
![]()
Glad Americans have options for employment and not the other way around.
![]()
![]()
Tiny,Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Well, make your case. State your issues in a clear and concise manner.
Because Obama...BooRadley » 11 Apr 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ We had low unemployment under Trump.
Do you realize that?
Nobody is saying that at all. I'll chalk you up as neurodivergent.Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Oh my God we have jobs to provide Americans with and now you guys are saying having employment available is a bad thing.
![]()
Glad Americans have options for employment and not the other way around.
![]()
![]()
So you're saying that jobs available to Americans are a myth.*rippy38 » 11 Apr 2024, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Just as many of us have been saying all along...
Biden Is Only ‘Adding’ Jobs Because Americans Need Extra Side Hustles To Make Ends Meet
Democrats claim that the economy added 303,000 jobs in March — but it added no full-time jobs at all in March. The economy actually shed 6,000 full-time jobs that month. In fact, full-time employment in the United States has dropped in each of the past four months. Since November, there are 1,787,000 fewer Americans with full-time employment.
Many Added Jobs Are Government Jobs
A shrinking full-time workforce and an increasing “moonlighting” workforce are, of course, signs of a troubled economy. But there’s more. Nearly 25 percent (71,000) of the so-called “added” jobs are government jobs. Since government employees make up about 15 percent of all workers, the March figures disproportionately “add” government jobs to “the economy.”
https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/10/bi ... ends-meet/
I explained his con, cretin.ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ No...you have attacked the source. To dispell them, you would need to provide a LINK that shows them to be incorrect.
We're still waiting.
What, exactly, are you saying?Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ Nobody is saying that at all. I'll chalk you up as neurodivergent.
Hey...I get it. You need to attack one of the oldest, largest, and most well-recognized surveys in the United States because you don't like the numbers and cannot prove they are wrong.R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Don't presume to educate me on this subject, clown.
You cut and pasted dutifully, but entirely frivolously.
Because you're a slack jawed simpleton.
Scroll down to
Comparison of survey concepts, definitions, and methodologies
Now demand that I explain it to you.
**** simpleton.
So... the Bureau of Labor is a "hack"?

So Obama is why we had low unemployment u der Trump?
If the low unemployment numbers during the first two years of the Trump administration are because of policies implemented by Obama (basically a lag in new policies having an impact of the economy), then the jobs recovered during the first two year of the Biden administration are because of policies implemented by Trump. Or does the lag only happen when a republican moves into the Oval Office?
BooRadley » 11 Apr 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ So Obama is why we had low unemployment u der Trump?
Whose fault that we have 7% interest rates?
Yes, it is...clearlyBooRadley » 11 Apr 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ So Obama is why we had low unemployment u der Trump?
Whose fault that we have 7% interest rates?

Lol