Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:00 am

this is a rate

this is "nominal".

You're a tiresome ignorant rube.

The BLS notes the following differences between the surveys:

• The household survey includes agricultural workers, self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, and private household workers among the employed. These groups are excluded from the establishment survey.
• The household survey includes people on unpaid leave among the employed. The establishment survey does not.
• The household survey is limited to workers 16 years of age and older. The establishment survey is not limited by age.
• The household survey has no duplication of individuals, because individuals are counted only once, even if they hold more than one job. In the establishment survey, employees working at more than one job and thus appearing on more than one payroll are counted separately for each appearance.

 
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:00 am

this is a rate

 

Which you are clueless about.

this is "nominal".

Which you are clueless about. 

You're a tiresome ignorant rube.

Projection ^^^

GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Apr 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:17 am

The BLS notes the following differences between the surveys:

• The household survey includes agricultural workers, self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, and private household workers among the employed. These groups are excluded from the establishment survey.
• The household survey includes people on unpaid leave among the employed. The establishment survey does not.
• The household survey is limited to workers 16 years of age and older. The establishment survey is not limited by age.
• The household survey has no duplication of individuals, because individuals are counted only once, even if they hold more than one job. In the establishment survey, employees working at more than one job and thus appearing on more than one payroll are counted separately for each appearance.

This is way over your head, RhinoHorn.

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:12 am

no, you aren't, Twatty.

You're waiting for your bleeding to stop.

 

There is no context where you could make that happen, Kung Fu Panda.

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:13 am

Define "meltdown"....without melting down.

Adkholio is having a senior moment.

Vegas » 11 Apr 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:18 am

Which you are clueless about.

Which you are clueless about. 

Projection ^^^

Why are you not 23 miles into your walkabout in the desert with a jar of chunky Peanut Butter?

I assure you....you'll find no Survivorship bias out there...

 
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 8:49 am

Because Obama...

With that reasoning, then the stated good jobs numbers must be because Trump not braindead biden......
 
 

Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:19 am

Adkholio is having a senior moment.

Fail.
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:18 am

I don't know how to perform that compound probability problem that you keep challenging me to do, I wish you would just leave me alone and continue to let me pretend that I know more about statistical analysis than you do        

 
 

Huey » 11 Apr 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:19 am

 

There is no context where you could make that happen, Kung Fu Panda.

You run from everything, Qimmie

Your own words....you name it, you run from it
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Apr 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:21 am

You're lying.

I told you I would.

But not for free.
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:20 am

Why are you not 23 miles into your walkabout in the desert with a jar of chunky Peanut Butter?

I assure you....you'll find no Survivorship bias out there...

Just as I thought. You are clueless on either.

   

So acknowledge that you don't know and I will give you as many examples as you would like.

1. Same incorrect definition
2. Turn it on me​​​​​​​

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am

You're lying.

I told you I would.

But not for free.

R.Suave » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
4 minutes ago
I don't know how to perform that compound probability problem that you keep challenging me to do, I wish you would just leave me alone and continue to let me pretend that I know more about statistical analysis than you do         
 

ConsRule » 11 Apr 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:16 am

Just FYI...your strike outs of things you don't like to see doesn't mean the post ceases to exist. It is, however, a typical tactic of yours when you get hit with logic that makes you look exceedingly hypocritical.

Don't presume, Coward.


There's no point in reading your crap because you can't stay on topic. You also lack the integrity to acknowledge the facts shown you.

 

Vegas » 11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am

Just as I thought. You are clueless on either.

   

So acknowledge that you don't know and I will give you as many examples as you would like.

1. Same incorrect definition
2. Turn it on me

Remember why you ran away crying yesterday?
​​​​​​​

Vegas » 11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am

Just as I thought. You are clueless on either.

   

So acknowledge that you don't know and I will give you as many examples as you would like.

1. Same incorrect definition
2. Turn it on me

Sp there are too many jobs for Americans that need them. 

​​​​​​​Lol
 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am

You're lying.

I told you I would.

But not for free.

R.Suave » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
4 minutes ago
I don't know how to perform that compound probability problem that you keep challenging me to do, I wish you would just leave me alone and continue to let me pretend that I know more about statistical analysis than you do         
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:23 am

R.Suave » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
4 minutes ago
I don't know how to perform that compound probability problem that you keep challenging me to do, I wish you would just leave me alone and continue to let me pretend that I know more about statistical analysis than you do      

Not for free.
 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 11 Apr 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:26 am

Sp there are too many jobs for Americans that need them. 

Lol

As always, you didn't read a damn thing. You two never do, then end up making an *** out of yourself for it. 

Go back and reread what I said, then get back to me. 

​​​​​​​*******. 

R.Suave » 11 Apr 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2024, 9:27 am

Not for free.

Oh my God there are jobs for Americans that need them. 

Its horrible.