Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Apr 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:20 pm

It sucks to be you, moron.  I did not say any of my family died.  They didn't.  I suggest you learn to read before spewing ignorant ****.

On 9/11 two cousins were working in the towers, one was in Building 7, and one worked in the emergency center below the towers.  My other cousin was a cop who was sent there before the towers fell.  And another family member was on the street when the first tower fell.

sure you did.  

I think you clearly implied that they were in the towers and died.



clearly implied... how's that work for ya?    

maineman » 15 Apr 2024, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:24 pm

sure you did.  



I think you clearly implied that they were in the towers and died.

 

Now you are just trying to save your lying ***.  I never said it, I never implied it, and when I corrected you, you still lie about it.  

BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 12:57 pm

Hey brains...
It happened in October 2000.
Clinton was out of office a few weeks later...

For instance, one day after the October 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole, candidate Bush proclaimed, “There must be a consequence.” Yet an FBI document dated January 26, 2001—six days after Bush took office—demonstrates that even though U.S. authorities discovered what they deemed to be clear evidence tying the Cole bombers to al Qaeda, Bush did nothing.

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -vacation/

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm

For instance, one day after the October 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole, candidate Bush proclaimed, “There must be a consequence.” Yet an FBI document dated January 26, 2001—six days after Bush took office—demonstrates that even though U.S. authorities discovered what they deemed to be clear evidence tying the Cole bombers to al Qaeda, Bush did nothing.

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -vacation/

Clinton blew  up an aspirin factory.....there's that. 

And remember who was President on Oct 12th 2000.  Wasn't Bush.  So it seems the failure rests on both of them.  Yet, you only blame one.  
 

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm

For instance, one day after the October 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole, candidate Bush proclaimed, “There must be a consequence.” Yet an FBI document dated January 26, 2001—six days after Bush took office—demonstrates that even though U.S. authorities discovered what they deemed to be clear evidence tying the Cole bombers to al Qaeda, Bush did nothing.

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -vacation/

Bush did nothing?

What did Clinton do in EIGHT years?
 
How many hundreds were killed in the embassy bombings?
 

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm

For instance, one day after the October 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole, candidate Bush proclaimed, “There must be a consequence.” Yet an FBI document dated January 26, 2001—six days after Bush took office—demonstrates that even though U.S. authorities discovered what they deemed to be clear evidence tying the Cole bombers to al Qaeda, Bush did nothing.

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... -vacation/

So...
You say Bush did nothing?

Tell us what Clinton did to stop all the terrorism?
You already stated that Clinton had no right to go after bin Laden..

.....But you complain that Bush didn't?

Wanna rethink that loser?
 

BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm

Bush did nothing?

What did Clinton do in EIGHT years?
 
How many hundreds were killed in the embassy bombings?

Nothing.....wasn't that concerned....

What did Clinton do in EIGHT years?

 The most important turning point under Clinton came in 1998, Gellman said, when the U.S. Embassy bombing transformed the U.S. policy literally overnight. “By the following day, Clinton had decided to kill Osama bin Laden,” he said. “And for the last two-and-a-half years of his term in office, he devoted quite a bit of his time and resources to try and do that.”

 According to Gellman, one of Clinton’s attempts almost proved disastrous in 2000 when the U.S. military “came within an hour or so of killing a friendly sheik.” The CIA was informed by a human source that linked bin Laden to a desert encampment in southern Afghanistan. The sighting was confirmed by overhead surveillance. After consulting with advisors, the president gave the go-ahead to prepare for a launch of a tomahawk missile from the Northern Arabian Sea.

 “Literally, the engines were on and the gyroscopes were targeted,” said Gellman. Suddenly, government officials were advised that what they originally detected as bin Laden’s camp was actually a “falconing expedition for a member of the royal family of the United Arab Emirates.”

 About a month after George W. Bush took office, a sophisticated, 100-pound, hellfire missile was successfully developed that could be carried on a 950-pound drone airplane. It could spot and shoot bin Laden within a space of about six seconds.

 “Think of a hummingbird carrying a hand grenade,” explained Gellman, who added that the new president made a decision in June -- three months before September 11 -- not to deploy the new weapon in Afghanistan. “They did not resume the covert hunt for bin Laden at that time.”

https://www.princeton.edu/news/2002/04/ ... llman-says
 

BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm

So...
You say Bush did nothing?

Tell us what Clinton did to stop all the terrorism?
You already stated that Clinton had no right to go after bin Laden..

.....But you complain that Bush didn't?

Wanna rethink that loser?

You already stated that Clinton had no right to go after bin Laden..

.....But you complain that Bush didn't?

Wanna rethink that loser?

You should.....

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm

Nothing.....wasn't that concerned....

 The most important turning point under Clinton came in 1998, Gellman said, when the U.S. Embassy bombing transformed the U.S. policy literally overnight. “By the following day, Clinton had decided to kill Osama bin Laden,” he said. “And for the last two-and-a-half years of his term in office, he devoted quite a bit of his time and resources to try and do that.”

 According to Gellman, one of Clinton’s attempts almost proved disastrous in 2000 when the U.S. military “came within an hour or so of killing a friendly sheik.” The CIA was informed by a human source that linked bin Laden to a desert encampment in southern Afghanistan. The sighting was confirmed by overhead surveillance. After consulting with advisors, the president gave the go-ahead to prepare for a launch of a tomahawk missile from the Northern Arabian Sea.

 “Literally, the engines were on and the gyroscopes were targeted,” said Gellman. Suddenly, government officials were advised that what they originally detected as bin Laden’s camp was actually a “falconing expedition for a member of the royal family of the United Arab Emirates.”

 About a month after George W. Bush took office, a sophisticated, 100-pound, hellfire missile was successfully developed that could be carried on a 950-pound drone airplane. It could spot and shoot bin Laden within a space of about six seconds.

 “Think of a hummingbird carrying a hand grenade,” explained Gellman, who added that the new president made a decision in June -- three months before September 11 -- not to deploy the new weapon in Afghanistan. “They did not resume the covert hunt for bin Laden at that time.”

https://www.princeton.edu/news/2002/04/ ... llman-says

So you say Clinton had no reason to kill bin Laden...???

And your own post has them saying they wanted to KILL bin Laden...

So what is it?
 

BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 2:11 pm

So you say Clinton had no reason to kill bin Laden...???

And your own post has them saying they wanted to KILL bin Laden...

So what is it?

It's about Scrub doing nothing and you eagerly rewarding him with 4 more years.

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 2:13 pm

It's about Scrub doing nothing and you eagerly rewarding him with 4 more years.

Actually, it is about you defending Clinton's inaction.  

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 2:13 pm

It's about Scrub doing nothing and you eagerly rewarding him with 4 more years.

Clinton did nothing after the WTC...

Remember?
And he had 8 years

And for the record Bush went into Afgan which you disagreed with...
 

Clinton had the opportunity twice to take out Obama bin laden but declined.

9/11 was the result of Clinton's new foreign policy on how the CIA recruits assets
 

Warcok » 15 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm

Clinton had the opportunity twice to take out Obama bin laden but declined.

9/11 was the result of Clinton's new foreign policy on how the CIA recruits assets

But 9/11 was an inside job so it doesn't matter

Huey » 15 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm

Actually, it is about you defending Clinton's inaction.

no...that is the diversion, Sheilagh.

*rippy38 » 15 Apr 2024, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 8:01 am

Worse than that, he's an idiot that truly believes he's the smartest guy in the room.

LOL

And forgets he's in a phone booth!

Huey » 15 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm

Now you are just trying to save your lying ***.  I never said it, I never implied it, and when I corrected you, you still lie about it.

Like I never said OR IMPLIED that I landed an aircraft and you still lie about it.

I think you DID imply it, just like you still claim I did rather than simply apologize,

We're two older men who spent a good part of their youth serving in the military.  I have never understood why you are so up my *** about EVERY **** thing.

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm

no...that is the diversion, Sheilagh.

Odd ..
You stated Clinton had no reason to kill bin Laden...

And then..
..the fool you are...

Shows a quote from the Clinton Administration saying they would kill bin Laden....

Seems like you're in a jam again


 

maineman » 15 Apr 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 3:48 pm

Like I never said OR IMPLIED that I landed an aircraft and you still lie about it.

I think you DID imply it, just like you still claim I did rather than simply apologize,

We're two older men who spent a good part of their youth serving in the military.  I have never understood why you are so up my *** about EVERY **** thing.

     

I have nothing to apologize for, asshole.

*******, over the years I have talked about on this forum and others.  Asshole, I am not going to suddenly wake up and claimed they died.  For alleged educated “man” you are a **** idiot.

And for the record, ****, YOU came at me today.  And now like a little bitch you are whining about me hitting back.

Keep that in mind the next time you troll me, mother ****.  Got it?

now, you can slink away and be left alone or you Can come back so I can cut you down at the knees.  Your call, mothrfeucker.
 

R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2024, 3:34 pm

no...that is the diversion, Sheilagh.

Read the thread title, Tiny feet.