https://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/09/kerry.iraq/R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Post the name of the Act for which he voted. Eager Scrub Apologist
BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/09/kerry.iraq/
Kerry stands by 'yes' vote on Iraq war
BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ "a grave threat to our security..."
Kinda sounds serious Suave
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
it wasn't....the authority to use force -- if necessary --
Stop playing **** games...
Clinton and Kerry disagree with you
I doubt it...
Clinton and Kerry both voted for the war.R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I doubt it...
https://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/ ... q-now-what
Post the name of the Act for which they voted.
Games?BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Stop playing **** games...
You claim Clinton had no reason to kill bin Laden
That's just dumb.
The terrorist murdered hundreds of people and Americans too.
You're just an idiot
An oldie but a goodie.
And you wanted to vote for Kerry in 2004?R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Games?
You dumb **** hole.
You're tossing this tantrum because you've made an *** of yourself regarding your 2004 vote.
You not only didn't give a **** about Khobar Towers, or the Cole....you didn't even give a **** about 9/11....you eagerly rewarded an inept war crime and resulting fiscal devastation with another vote.
Because FOX told you to.
******* Southie.
There wouldn't be a "topic" had you not had your empty skull handed to you.BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ And you wanted to vote for Kerry in 2004?
He voted for the war in Iraq..
Remember?
And he "stands by his vote"
More important, all you've done is try to spin away from the topic.
...Clinton had no reason to kill bin Laden..
After he murdered hundreds and bragged about it??
Yeah..
That kinda explains you
NoR.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ There wouldn't be a "topic" had you not had your empty skull handed to you.
9/11 wasn't enough to you.BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ No
You made an idiot out of yourself...
Clinton had no reason to kill bin Laden?
Kobar Towers
USS Cole
WTC 1993
African Embassy's
How many dead?
Clinton had 8 years to kill bin Laden ..
Scrub had 8 years, far better reason....and you didn't give a ****.BooRadley » 15 Apr 2024, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Clinton had 8 years to kill bin Laden ..
You claim he had no reason to kill him.
Now that's a classic
R.Suave » 15 Apr 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Scrub had 8 years, far better reason....and you didn't give a ****.