Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:37 pm

Excerpt:

"The phrase 'Close, but No Cigar' is used to indicate that you have fallen just short of a successful outcome and have received no reward for your efforts."

https://www.gingersoftware.com/content/ ... t-no-cigar

Anyone with any sense of reason can see that the phrases "close but not quite there" and "close but no cigar" both effectively relay the message that you have fallen just short of a successful outcome and have received no reward for your efforts.

You have yet to show otherwise other than saying  -nuh uh!-

Try again.

Go.

 

​​​​​​

This is predictably stupid on numerous levels beginning with "no reward".

Define the "reward" in this context.

How can there be no cigar if you can't even tell me where my definition fell short?

It can't be very far from mine to whatever neither of you can posit as the Ideal.

You heard an interesting story about WW2...you don't know **** about statistics...
 

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm

What is a reddie of not an emotional outburst, ProjectoLass...

Not at all.  I have told you this before.  It is a way of saying I disagree and I saw it without wasting more forum space.  Kinda like the disagree option elsewhere. 

Zeets2 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:42 pm

You didn't answer my question, did you?
WHAT COULD HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE TO STOP THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE?

I don't see where you're going.

EVERYONE knew it would die in the Senate.

Even a **** brick like you.
 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:40 pm

Do you know what cherry picking even is? Clearly not or you wouldn't have even asked that. 

Well...Einstein. You see, there were presidents that were ranked....and you chose only a sample and tried to just use those (I believe it was just the presidents that you hated and liked)...hence, cherry picked.

I cannot dumb that down further.

I've got this stupid SOB arguing that the phrases "close but not quite there" and "close but no cigar" are "significantly" different.

He just said they were "manifestly different" even.

 
 
 

Huey » 18 Apr 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:43 pm

Not at all.  I have told you this before.  It is a way of saying I disagree and I saw it without wasting more forum space.  Kinda like the disagree option elsewhere.

"I disagree" followed by a supporting case, is a way of saying "I disagree".

A reddie is a way of saying
"MY HEAD IS BLEEDING....AGAIN!"

*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm

I've got this stupid SOB arguing that the phrases "close but not quite there" and "close but no cigar" are "significantly" different.

He just said they were "manifestly different"

Uggghhhhh....he will never admit that he is wrong. Ever. 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm

Nope. Ok, you had your chance. I told you that your next post needs to have picked a judge, you failed. 

Back to the rule again. You stalled and bluffed, as always. 

What is survivorship bias in your words. **** your incorrect definition.

Who says my definition is incorrect?


 

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:48 pm

Who says my definition is incorrect?

I've explained to you twice now why I felt it was "close but not quite there"...

LOL

 
 

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm

"I disagree" followed by a supporting case, is a way of saying "I disagree".

A reddie is a way of saying
"MY HEAD IS BLEEDING....AGAIN!"

 

That would be a waste of forum space with you.  You would turn a simple I disagree into pages of endless whiny demands.  

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:48 pm

Who says my definition is incorrect?

Your definition from Google. 

Not stop asking the same **** questions.

1. You will ask the same questions

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm

"MY HEAD IS BLEEDING....AGAIN!"

I told you to have your doctor have a look at that.

 
 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:51 pm

Your definition from Google. 

Not stop asking the same **** questions.

1. You will ask the same questions

Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...

LOL
 

*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm

I've got this stupid SOB arguing that the phrases "close but not quite there" and "close but no cigar" are "significantly" different.

He just said they were "manifestly different" even.

And I offered a logical argument why.

There's an even better one...

They are different because you meant a difference.

when challenged to elaborate, you first meekly responded with "in my opinion". Vague claptrap for "I can't tell you."

The next day, after a meeting with Vegas behind closed doors you came out with v2, and a host of comical assertions about football.

Because you don't know **** about stats.

Now you wanna convince me that the two comments are the same.

You're a **** idiot.

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm

And I offered a logical argument why.

There's an even better one...

They are different because you meant a difference.

when challenged to elaborate, you first meekly responded with "in my opinion". Vague claptrap for "I can't tell you."

The next day, after a meeting with Vegas behind closed doors you came out with v2, and a host of comical assertions about football.

Because you don't know **** about stats.

Now you wanna convince me that the two comments are the same.

You're a **** idiot.

You have offered ****!

You better sit down before you fall down buddy because that spin machine is on Max speed!

     
 
 

*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm

I told you to have your doctor have a look at that.

I know you are.....


**** idiot.
 

*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:56 pm

You have offered ****!

You better sit down before you fall down buddy because that spin machine is on Max speed!

   

My feefees are facts, but you spin....


you really are an idiot.

Huey » 18 Apr 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:51 pm

That would be a waste of forum space with you.  You would turn a simple I disagree into pages of endless whiny demands.

37X, please....

R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm

37X, please....

 

How is Rentalegs doing?

*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm

Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...

LOL

They are never answered..

Have you seen yourself freak out over a slight delay?
 

Huey » 18 Apr 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2024, 2:00 pm

How is Rentalegs doing?

Another headshot....here comes Issue.