Breathtaking!!!!
By R. Suave
18 Apr 2024 6:32 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Apr 2024 5:24 pm
There isn't anything to "work on".R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ We were working on it, but you became hysterical at the sight of your own words....got the whole coop worked up..
Just quote the post where I stated the rule.
It either exists, or it doesn't.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
18 Apr 2024 5:46 pm
*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑ There isn't anything to "work on".
Just quote the post where I stated the rule.
It either exists, or it doesn't.
you did it in more than one.
18 Apr 2024 5:46 pm
It would've been a week long trial of showing the country what the Border looks like and it would have been bad optics for the ****.
Impeachment managers would've been showing all the videos of the illegal wetbacks tearing down fences and charging in. That's why Cuck Sodomite dismissed it.
Good news is dimocrats set another precedent. When Republicans control the Senate and dimocrats want to impeach Trump again Republicans in the Senate will table their impeachment indefinitely
Impeachment managers would've been showing all the videos of the illegal wetbacks tearing down fences and charging in. That's why Cuck Sodomite dismissed it.
Good news is dimocrats set another precedent. When Republicans control the Senate and dimocrats want to impeach Trump again Republicans in the Senate will table their impeachment indefinitely
18 Apr 2024 5:54 pm
You're just trying to spin one up is all.
You and I both know I never stated any sort of "rule".
Why can't you just admit it instead of trying to make **** up to save face?
Admitting you made a mistake instead furiously scratching around like a cat covering up a turd in the litter box is much more honorable and would gain you respect in the long run.
Just sayin'
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
18 Apr 2024 5:59 pm
Keep spinnin'*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ You're just trying to spin one up is all.
You and I both know I never stated any sort of "rule".
Why can't you just admit it instead of trying to make **** up to save face?
Admitting you made a mistake instead furiously scratching around like a cat covering up a turd in the litter box is much more honorable and would gain you respect in the long run.
Just sayin'
18 Apr 2024 6:01 pm
I accept your concession.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
18 Apr 2024 6:07 pm
If so, then you beat me to it.
By asking you to acknowledge your words.You're just trying to spin one up is all.
It's so unfair.
18 Apr 2024 6:56 pm
You are so **** clueless...you do know that it is possible to not break a rule, right?
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
18 Apr 2024 7:21 pm
Ok..Vegas » 18 Apr 2024, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You are so **** clueless...you do know that it is possible to not break a rule, right?
You acknowledge that you're a moron, then I'll explain why you're a moron.
Your rule...
18 Apr 2024 7:31 pm
R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok..
You acknowledge that you're a moron, then I'll explain why you're a moron.
Your rule...
You are the one that thinks survivorship bias is about dead people. That's on you.
And I don't know what your issue is with rules. All you do is demand rules: "Post the rule..." "I am going to need a rule..." Etc...
That's on you also.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
18 Apr 2024 7:41 pm
Post the reference to "dead people" in my definition.Vegas » 18 Apr 2024, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the one that thinks survivorship bias is about dead people. That's on you.
And I don't know what your issue is with rules. All you do is demand rules: "Post the rule..." "I am going to need a rule..." Etc...
That's on you also.
i don't have one.And I don't know what your issue is with rules.
Acknowledge that you're a moron and I'll explain it to you..
18 Apr 2024 7:46 pm
R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the reference to "dead people" in my definition.
i don't have one.
Acknowledge that you're a moron and I'll explain it to you..
Turning it on me as always. 100% accuracy.
Your whole definition is vague as hell, for obvious reasons. Oh wait....you used the words 'sample' and 'population.' Congrats for knowing the elementary basics of stats. That is tantamount to bragging that you know the alphabet.
What is survivorship bias in your own words? And **** your incorrect definition.
Ask me why
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
19 Apr 2024 5:10 am
Vegas » 18 Apr 2024, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Turning it on me as always. 100% accuracy.
Your whole definition is vague as hell, for obvious reasons. Oh wait....you used the words 'sample' and 'population.' Congrats for knowing the elementary basics of stats. That is tantamount to bragging that you know the alphabet.
What is survivorship bias in your own words? And **** your incorrect definition.
Ask me why
Settle down, Mary....if YOU lie, then YOU will be humiliated.Turning it on me as always
You aren't qualified to judge the accuracy of my definition, because you're a moron.
You can't define the term or offer an example.
Because you're a moron.
Define Survivorship bias without reference to "sample" and "population".Oh wait....you used the words 'sample' and 'population.' Congrats for knowing the elementary basics of stats. That is tantamount to bragging that you know the alphabet
Prediction: Whining will continue, no definition will be posted.
Because Vegas is a moron.
19 Apr 2024 5:51 am
*rippy38 » 18 Apr 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ Dude... if you are incapable of scrolling back up a few posts then I can't help ya.
How do you remember to breathe?
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
19 Apr 2024 6:36 am
You laid in the bed staring at the ceiling thinking about this last night didn't you.R.Suave » 18 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ And I offered a logical argument why.
There's an even better one...
They are different because you meant a difference.
when challenged to elaborate, you first meekly responded with "in my opinion". Vague claptrap for "I can't tell you."
The next day, after a meeting with Vegas behind closed doors you came out with v2, and a host of comical assertions about football.
Because you don't know **** about stats.
Now you wanna convince me that the two comments are the same.
You're a **** idiot.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
19 Apr 2024 7:49 am
Before we start, would you post the time stamp.*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑ You laid in the bed staring at the ceiling thinking about this last night didn't you.
19 Apr 2024 8:04 am
Didn't you agree to answer my questions once I answered yours, you lying scumbag?
HOW DID HOUSE DEMOCRATS INDULGE REPUBLICANS IN THE IMPEACHMENT OF MAYORKAS?
19 Apr 2024 8:06 am
I said they wouldn't and didn't.Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ Didn't you agree to answer my questions once I answered yours, you lying scumbag?
HOW DID HOUSE DEMOCRATS INDULGE REPUBLICANS IN THE IMPEACHMENT OF MAYORKAS?
Now what?
19 Apr 2024 8:12 am
NO YOU DIDN'T, DICKHEAD!
You asked WHY SHOULD they be indulged, and here's your quote you lying scumbag!
If, as you admit, this was all about PR, why should the Indolent Dross in the House be indulged?
19 Apr 2024 8:14 am
The "Indolent Dross" is the House majority, ya ****' oaf.Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ NO YOU DIDN'T, DICKHEAD!
You asked WHY SHOULD they be indulged, and here's your quote you lying scumbag!
Who is online
In total there are 2610 users online :: 10 registered, 16 bots, and 2584 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, springfield xd, ….., Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Moblie Safari, Adsbot, Bolt, proximic, Pandalytics, ADmantX, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, GPTBot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, bingbot, Applebot