Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:14 am

The "Indolent Dross" is the House majority, ya ****' oaf.

So why can't you answer the question, wimp?
Or is it just that you can't deny your own stupidity, because you thought House Democrats could somehow indulge that House majority in the impeachment?
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 7:49 am

Before we start, would you post the time stamp.

I saw that after I made the reply.

I got the notification for that reply from you this morning and made my reply right after. Maybe it was a board glitch.

Weird.
 

Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:20 am

So why can't you answer the question, wimp?
Or is it just that you can't deny your own stupidity, because you thought House Democrats could somehow indulge that House majority in the impeachment?

Because I can't make any sense of it...I'm not on your drugs.

Senate democrats, idiot, didn't need to....so they drowned it in the tub.

Clear?



 

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 6:36 am

You laid in the bed staring at the ceiling thinking about this last night didn't you.

 

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:21 am

I saw that after I made the reply.

I got the notification for that reply from you this morning and made my reply right after. Maybe it was a board glitch.

Weird.

That's all you have to yap?


Now...

 

ROG62 » 19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am

So **** stupid....

 
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:23 am

That's all you have to yap?

Now...

You seem surprised that I'm not trying to spin it into something it's not.

All I'm saying is that I got a notification from you this morning, and when I opened it, that was the post I saw... so I replied.

Now let's watch you try furiously to turn it into something "bigger".

Go.

LOL


 

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:27 am

You seem surprised that I'm not trying to spin it into something it's not.

All I'm saying is that I got a notification from you this morning, and when I opened it, that was the post I saw... so I replied.

Now let's watch you try furiously to turn it into something "bigger".

Go.

LOL

I haven't turned it into anything.

This is all you, wooly headed codger.


 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am

Because I can't make any sense of it...I'm not on your drugs.

Senate democrats, idiot, didn't need to....so they drowned it in the tub.

Clear?

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:30 am

I haven't turned it into anything.

This is all you, wooly headed codger.

So, continue from your last "Now..."

What's next?
 
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am

Because I can't make any sense of it...I'm not on your drugs.

Senate democrats, idiot, didn't need to....so they drowned it in the tub.

Clear?

No, it's about as muddled as your feeble brain!

You stupidly claimed HOUSE Dems shouldn't indulge the impeachment WHEN THEY COULDN'T HAVE DONE ANYTHING TO STOP IT!
And now you want to change the claim while running away.
******!
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 5:10 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 5:10 am

Settle down, Mary....if YOU lie, then YOU will be humiliated.

You aren't qualified to judge the accuracy of my definition, because you're a moron.
You can't define the term or offer an example.

Because you're a moron.

Define Survivorship bias without reference to "sample" and "population".

Prediction: Whining will continue, no definition will be posted.

Because Vegas is a moron.

What is survivorship bias in your word? And **** your incorrect definition.
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:30 am

I haven't turned it into anything.

This is all you, wooly headed codger.

I'm not wooly headed either...

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 9:10 am

I'm not wooly headed either...

In your judgement...

Clinically, it is an entirely different story.
 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 9:11 am

In your judgement...

Clinically, it is an entirely different story.

You have to have hair to be wooly headed.
 

*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 9:13 am

You have to have hair to be wooly headed.

Not on the outside, you don't.


 

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 8:22 am

Because I can't make any sense of it...I'm not on your drugs.

Senate democrats, idiot, didn't need to....so they drowned it in the tub.

Clear?

Senate dim-0-craps did the repubs a huge favor by voting to dismiss idiot mayorkas' impeachment.  LOL!!!  Braindead biden and mayorkie's unlimited illegal invasion of the US by illegal criminals, gangs and drugs is a top concern for voters.  Voters will remember dim-0-craps failure to address the illegal invasion in Nov.  LOL!!!  They like you are IDIOTS!!!  LOL!!!
 
 

Buffalo » 19 Apr 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 10:31 am

Senate dim-0-craps did the repubs a huge favor by voting to dismiss idiot mayorkas' impeachment.  LOL!!!  Braindead biden and mayorkie's unlimited illegal invasion of the US by illegal criminals, gangs and drugs is a tip concern for voters.  Voters will remember dim-0-craps failure to address the illegal invasion in Nov.  LOL!!!  They ilke you are IDIOTS!!!  LOL!!!

How have you done forecasting to date, Buffy..

R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 10:32 am

How have you done forecasting to date, Buffy..

In Nov the voters will remember that dim-0-craps want open borders and open borders is not what the voters want.  LOL!!!
 

Buffalo » 19 Apr 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2024, 10:38 am

In Nov the voters will remember that dim-0-craps want open borders and open borders is not what the voters want.  LOL!!!

Read the question again.