Liberal Forum

GREAT CREDIBLE WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION
             


Michael Cohen Admits Paying Former Pornstar Stormy Daniels from His Own Pocket | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
 

Yeah and all they gotta prove is Trump knew that it was to stop the public from knowing about it.

And the Cohen recordings did just that.

righteous » 13 May 2024, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2024, 9:58 pm

GREAT CREDIBLE WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION
             

Michael Cohen Admits Paying Former Pornstar Stormy Daniels from His Own Pocket | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

This is ALL you need to totally PROVE that Cohen committed perjury YESTERDAY again and needs to be put back in prison for a very long time. Again.

Fr2v22UWcAM3dtf-434x600.jpg (434×600) (thegatewaypundit.com)
 

Bidencrimefamily » 14 May 2024, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 2:43 am

Yeah and all they gotta prove is Trump knew that it was to stop the public from knowing about it.

And the Cohen recordings did just that.

So what, DICKFACE?? There is NO STATUTE that makes an NDA a CRIME nor is there any STATUTE that makes running a campaign where you minimize any "bad things" being said about a candidate a crime either!!

AS IT STANDS NOW, NO CRIME has been presented OR PROVEN in any testimony so far. So what you **** IDIOTS HAVE is your pundits and handlers BLOWING A CLOUD OF SMOKE UP YOUR ASSES with nothing solid to back it up!!

 

Bidencrimefamily » 14 May 2024, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 2:43 am

Yeah and all they gotta prove is Trump knew that it was to stop the public from knowing about it.

And the Cohen recordings did just that.

Actually, since he is charged with a felony related to falsifying documents, they have to prove he directed the payments be recorded as legal expenses.  And the prosecution has not produced a single witness that has even hinted that was the case.  In fact, two witnesses directly involved with the payment process have testified just the opposite.
 

ConsRule » 14 May 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 6:27 am

Actually, since he is charged with a felony related to falsifying documents, they have to prove he directed the payments be recorded as legal expenses.  And the prosecution has not produced a single witness that has even hinted that was the case.  In fact, two witnesses directly involved with the payment process have testified just the opposite.

What's so **** up about Fat Alvin's "charges" is that the WORK Cohen did was for LEGAL WORK. So Bragg needs to tell us what Trump SHOULD Have recorded it as!! He is saying that it "should" have been Campaign finance related, yet the Federal Election Commission DOES NOT PERMIT "legal expenses" for an NDA to be shown on their expense/donation filings. Those are considered PERSONAL or BUSINESS related, not campaign related.  Fat Alvin is hopefully going to learn that there was ZERO "crime" here as I ultimately believe this will NEVER reach a jury.

righteous » 13 May 2024, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2024, 9:58 pm

GREAT CREDIBLE WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION
             

Michael Cohen Admits Paying Former Pornstar Stormy Daniels from His Own Pocket | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Yeah he also testified that Trump paid him back.  
 

Bidencrimefamily » 14 May 2024, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:11 am

Yeah he also testified that Trump paid him back.

That's not a crime.  The prosecution has to prove that Trump directed them to falsify business records. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
 

ConsRule » 14 May 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:18 am

That's not a crime.  The prosecution has to prove that Trump directed them to falsify business records. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

It's the same as paying her. 
 

ConsRule » 14 May 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:18 am

That's not a crime.  The prosecution has to prove that Trump directed them to falsify business records. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

The crime here is falsifying business documents to pay Cohen back. 

Thats the charges. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 14 May 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:24 am

The crime here is falsifying business documents to pay Cohen back. 

Thats the charges.

exactly.

Paying for political campaign damage control is a campaign expense, not a business expense.

Bidencrimefamily » 14 May 2024, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:23 am

It's the same as paying her.

Still doesn't make it a crime.  An NDA is not illegal.
 

Bidencrimefamily » 14 May 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:24 am

The crime here is falsifying business documents to pay Cohen back. 

Thats the charges.

And they have produced zero evidence that happened.  In fact, two prosecution witnesses have testified to just the opposite.
 

maineman » 14 May 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:31 am

exactly.

Paying for political campaign damage control is a campaign expense, not a business expense.

Except that it's NOT A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN EXPENCE based on CURRENT FEC LAW!! Even the FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE FEC said it WAS NOT A REPORTABLE EXPENCE AND HAD IT BEEN REPORTED, IT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF THE FEC LAWS!!

Suck on that one ***!! 
 

maineman » 14 May 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 7:31 am

exactly.

Paying for political campaign damage control is a campaign expense, not a business expense.

OH, and NUMBNUTS, if it WAS INDEED a "political campaign expense" as YOU CLAIM, then it would NOT BE A STATE CRIME since FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN FINANCE IS GOVERNED UNDER FEDERAL LAW and the STATES HAVE NO JURISDICTION UNDER THAT LAW TO BRING ANY "charges" OF ANY SORT!!

And the FEDS ALREADY INVESTIGATED AND DETERMINED THAT NO LAW HAD BEEN BROKEN BY BOTH THE FEC AND THE SDNY FED PROSECUTORS OFFICE!!

YOU LOSE, ASSHOLE!!

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony under New York state law that requires that the "intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof". This is in contrast to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor that does not have that requirement. The New York state law does not specify that the other crime being concealed by the falsification of those records must also be a state crime. In this case, the Manhattan DA has listed three such crimes that Trump allegedly intended to commit and conceal: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement.

righteous » 13 May 2024, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 May 2024, 9:58 pm

GREAT CREDIBLE WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION
             

Michael Cohen Admits Paying Former Pornstar Stormy Daniels from His Own Pocket | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

I bet he tapped that 

I would have titty **** her until those **** BAGS were black and blue.

But that diseased axe cut......nooooo way.

maineman » 14 May 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 12:49 pm

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony under New York state law that requires that the "intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof". This is in contrast to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor that does not have that requirement. The New York state law does not specify that the other crime being concealed by the falsification of those records must also be a state crime. In this case, the Manhattan DA has listed three such crimes that Trump allegedly intended to commit and conceal: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement.

Pssst. **** COWARD PIECE OF NAZI ****.

Trump has NOT BEEN CHARGED with any FEDERAL CRIME NOR CONVICTED OF ANY!! And NY State has ZERO jurisdiction to attempt to PROVE he committed one. PERIOD!! And unless there is an UNDERLYING CRIME Trump was convicted of, there is ZERO CASE IN NY STATE!!

Not to mention that the FEDS have already investigated and determined that NO CRIMES WERE EVER COMMITTED on the part of Trump and his campaign!!

PERHAPS your handlers need to INFORM YOU BETTER, COWARD **** NAZI ASSHOLE!!

maineman » 14 May 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 May 2024, 12:49 pm

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony under New York state law that requires that the "intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof". This is in contrast to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor that does not have that requirement. The New York state law does not specify that the other crime being concealed by the falsification of those records must also be a state crime. In this case, the Manhattan DA has listed three such crimes that Trump allegedly intended to commit and conceal: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement.

And they still haven't produced a single witness or piece of evidence that Trump directed anyone to falsify a business record. For him to be convicted, that is what they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.