Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 31 May 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2024, 12:18 pm

The vote tally is at the bottom of the page.

Do you see it?

https://i.postimg.cc/PxfF2djz/Screensho ... Page-4.png

Trump won't go to prison. 

I hope that he get 20,000 hours of community service. 

Him cleaning the side of the road would be fun. 
 

And then there is this.. but according to the senile cult it is Trump that's a threat to democracy..

 

https://youtu.be/c3L-LlpmIQQ

Blackvegetable » 31 May 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

31 May 2024, 8:13 am

Why not?

Take a......uhhhhh....you know....standy thing...

My “standy thing”…

Statute of limitations expiration
Selective prosecution
Judicial conflict
Unidentified crime
Lack of jury unanimity on underlying facts
Allowing prejudicial testimony
State prosecution of federal election law
Disallowing defense witnesses
Witness intimidation by judge
DA withholding discovery
Suborning perjury
Limiting defense closing arguments
Making defense give closing arguments first with no rebuttal
Unconstitutional jury instructions

 

Cedar » 01 Jun 2024, 2:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 2:34 am

My “standy thing”…

Statute of limitations expiration
Selective prosecution
Judicial conflict
Unidentified crime
Lack of jury unanimity on underlying facts
Allowing prejudicial testimony
State prosecution of federal election law
Disallowing defense witnesses
Witness intimidation by judge
DA withholding discovery
Suborning perjury
Limiting defense closing arguments
Making defense give closing arguments first with no rebuttal
Unconstitutional jury instructions

let's cut this short...

who is telling you this, Ruby?
 

*rippy38 » 31 May 2024, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

31 May 2024, 6:49 am

What will Merchan do?

It's not going to matter. Since CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS at the trial occurred, a STAY of sentence will be sought at the SCOTUS and none of it will ever be fulfilled since they are going to TOSS IT MASSIVELY. Expect Alito to issue an EMERGENCY STAY pending full court review since he handles that Federal District. They **** up trying to toss him off cases too. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 5:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 5:08 am

let's cut this short...

who is telling you this, Ruby?

Watch the APPEAL that hits your DEAD *** IN A FEW WEEKS!!!

You can bet 100% of that and a LOT MORE will be in it, DICKSHAPEDMOUTH!!!

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 5:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 5:08 am

let's cut this short...

who is telling you this, Ruby?

Here DICKSUCK.....

CNN legal analyst Mark O’Mara predicted that former President Donald Trump’s guilty verdict will be appealed due to a “number of significant issues.” 

 O’Mara said that the odds are in Trump’s favor after 12 jurors found the former president guilty in a sham case regarding 34 charges brought against him in the New York hush money trial.

 He suggested that the trial was handled unprofessionally and therefore will grant Trump a successful appeal. O’Mara put aside the fact that the case involved Trump and claimed that Judge Juan Merchan did not deliver a fair and honest trial.

 “We don’t talk about Donald Trump anymore. We talk about the defensibility case and whether or not the judge did everything the judge was supposed to do to ensure a fair trial, unaffected by the outside world,” O’Mara said. “And I’ve complained… that the idea that this jury wasn’t sequestered, not even during their deliberations, not to mention for that week before between trial and closings, I think that’s a massive mistake.”The former attorney explained that the Trump team could argue against several things that may have influenced the jurors’ decision to convict the 45th president. 


"The defense is going to follow the trail of every one of these jurors when they find out who they are and how they are, where they drove, what they did, every billboard that they saw, all of that, and that’s going to be the fodder for appeals that this jury was infected by negativity that this judge didn’t protect their client from,” he continued. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 5:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 5:08 am

let's cut this short...

who is telling you this, Ruby?

Just because you rely on outside sources to form every opinion for you, it certainly doesn't mean that everyone else does.
 

Beekeeper » 01 Jun 2024, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:17 am

Here DICKSUCK.....

CNN legal analyst Mark O’Mara predicted that former President Donald Trump’s guilty verdict will be appealed due to a “number of significant issues.” 

 O’Mara said that the odds are in Trump’s favor after 12 jurors found the former president guilty in a sham case regarding 34 charges brought against him in the New York hush money trial.

 He suggested that the trial was handled unprofessionally and therefore will grant Trump a successful appeal. O’Mara put aside the fact that the case involved Trump and claimed that Judge Juan Merchan did not deliver a fair and honest trial.

 “We don’t talk about Donald Trump anymore. We talk about the defensibility case and whether or not the judge did everything the judge was supposed to do to ensure a fair trial, unaffected by the outside world,” O’Mara said. “And I’ve complained… that the idea that this jury wasn’t sequestered, not even during their deliberations, not to mention for that week before between trial and closings, I think that’s a massive mistake.”The former attorney explained that the Trump team could argue against several things that may have influenced the jurors’ decision to convict the 45th president. 

"The defense is going to follow the trail of every one of these jurors when they find out who they are and how they are, where they drove, what they did, every billboard that they saw, all of that, and that’s going to be the fodder for appeals that this jury was infected by negativity that this judge didn’t protect their client from,” he continued.

Tossing you a bone...

He'll get nowhere until it gets to SCOTUS....At which point Free Ride and Sammy the Bull will fix it for him.

Huey » 31 May 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

31 May 2024, 9:04 am

What are you talking about? 

Talk about **** vagueness.  What protest.  State your case.

He started that babbling about 45 minutes ago... 

I think he's smoking that **** again.
 

*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:18 am

Just because you rely on outside sources to form every opinion for you, it certainly doesn't mean that everyone else does.

This is creepy enough when Huey does it.

Let Cheddy answer for himself.

You contribute nothing except more evidence that you're an imbecile.
 

*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:23 am

He started that babbling about 45 minutes ago... 

I think he's smoking that **** again.

Time tripping, Trippie?

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:24 am

This is creepy enough when Huey does it.

Let Cheddy answer for himself.

You contribute nothing except more evidence that you're an imbecile.

If I'm an imbecile then what does it say about you that I thump your skull regularly?

LOL
 

Beekeeper » 01 Jun 2024, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:13 am

It's not going to matter. Since CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS at the trial occurred, a STAY of sentence will be sought at the SCOTUS and none of it will ever be fulfilled since they are going to TOSS IT MASSIVELY. Expect Alito to issue an EMERGENCY STAY pending full court review since he handles that Federal District. They **** up trying to toss him off cases too.

Name 2 "constitutional violations"
 

*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:25 am

If I'm an imbecile then what does it say about you that I thump your skull regularly?

LOL

You and Huey are undefeeeeeted...

Because you ALWAYS run.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:21 am

Tossing you a bone...

He'll get nowhere until it gets to SCOTUS....At which point Free Ride and Sammy the Bull will fix it for him.

You tossed nothing. I've said all along that the SCOTUS would be appealed to ASAP since there are PROVEN 5th, 6th and 7th Amendment violations. And the FACT that he could NEVER get a fair hearing in NY State at any level of Court.

You ASSUME more than you are capable of comprehending.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:27 am

You and Huey are undefeeeeeted...

Because you ALWAYS run.

Nobody runs from you veggie... trust me.

Lol
 

*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:35 am

Nobody runs from you veggie... trust me.

Lol

Trippie,

Always...it's a defining MAGAt quality.


 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:36 am

Trippie,

Always...it's a defining MAGAt quality.

Is that why you ran from my poll?

LOL
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jun 2024, 6:26 am

Name 2 "constitutional violations"

NO "underlying crime" was stated in the Indictment as the 6th Amendment requires, and WITNESSES for the Defense were NOT permitted to testify on the LAW that was being "asserted" as an FEC violation.

Sixth Amendment

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Do you actually ENJOY having your *** KICKED ****??