Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Speaking of "Hush Money' payments...
Speaking of "Hush Money' payments...
By *rippy38
31 May 2024 7:52 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
31 May 2024 7:52 pm
Since the precedent has been set by Bragg and Merchan, I guess it's time to crack open the ledger as see who else needs to be indicted...
I realize this is from 2017, but hey, the statute of limitations no longer applies either!
This was taxpayer money too!
Time to clean house!
Congress paid $17 million in workplace violation settlements
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government has paid more than $17 million in taxpayer money over the last 20 years to resolve claims of sexual harassment, overtime pay disputes and other workplace violations filed by employees of Congress.
Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., testified earlier this week that two sitting members of Congress have engaged in sexual harassment. But she refused to identify them because the victims don’t want the lawmakers named publicly. Speier said she is barred from identifying one member because of a nondisclosure agreement, and isn’t identifying the second lawmaker at the victim’s request.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congre ... 25ab614f0c
I realize this is from 2017, but hey, the statute of limitations no longer applies either!
This was taxpayer money too!
Time to clean house!
Congress paid $17 million in workplace violation settlements
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government has paid more than $17 million in taxpayer money over the last 20 years to resolve claims of sexual harassment, overtime pay disputes and other workplace violations filed by employees of Congress.
Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., testified earlier this week that two sitting members of Congress have engaged in sexual harassment. But she refused to identify them because the victims don’t want the lawmakers named publicly. Speier said she is barred from identifying one member because of a nondisclosure agreement, and isn’t identifying the second lawmaker at the victim’s request.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congre ... 25ab614f0c
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 1:25 am
Go after them.*rippy38 » 31 May 2024, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Since the precedent has been set by Bragg and Merchan, I guess it's time to crack open the ledger as see who else needs to be indicted...
I realize this is from 2017, but hey, the statute of limitations no longer applies either!
This was taxpayer money too!
Time to clean house!
Congress paid $17 million in workplace violation settlements
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government has paid more than $17 million in taxpayer money over the last 20 years to resolve claims of sexual harassment, overtime pay disputes and other workplace violations filed by employees of Congress.
Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., testified earlier this week that two sitting members of Congress have engaged in sexual harassment. But she refused to identify them because the victims don’t want the lawmakers named publicly. Speier said she is barred from identifying one member because of a nondisclosure agreement, and isn’t identifying the second lawmaker at the victim’s request.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congre ... 25ab614f0c
We don't care when criminal get charged for doing crimes.
You cons fall in love with criminal and want to kill Americans over it.
But we the people are tired of it.
1 Jun 2024 6:23 am
1 Jun 2024 7:06 am
Trippie, you little coward....*rippy38 » 31 May 2024, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Since the precedent has been set by Bragg and Merchan, I guess it's time to crack open the ledger as see who else needs to be indicted...
I realize this is from 2017, but hey, the statute of limitations no longer applies either!
This was taxpayer money too!
Time to clean house!
Congress paid $17 million in workplace violation settlements
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government has paid more than $17 million in taxpayer money over the last 20 years to resolve claims of sexual harassment, overtime pay disputes and other workplace violations filed by employees of Congress.
Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., testified earlier this week that two sitting members of Congress have engaged in sexual harassment. But she refused to identify them because the victims don’t want the lawmakers named publicly. Speier said she is barred from identifying one member because of a nondisclosure agreement, and isn’t identifying the second lawmaker at the victim’s request.
https://apnews.com/united-states-congre ... 25ab614f0c
You can't remember what you did last month.
Whose water are you carrying?
1 Jun 2024 7:08 am
It begins with a referral...
1 Jun 2024 7:09 am
What the hell are you being about now?Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Trippie, you little coward....
You can't remember what you did last month.
Whose water are you carrying?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 7:14 am
Trippie,
I really don't get this HooooeyVagina rhetorical tactic of playing dumb.
You can do that for much longer than I can type...
1 Jun 2024 7:20 am
Okay... explain what the **** this reply...Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Trippie,
I really don't get this HooooeyVagina rhetorical tactic of playing dumb.
You can do that for much longer than I can type...
... has to do with the topic of the OP.Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Trippie, you little coward....
You can't remember what you did last month.
Whose water are you carrying?
1, 2, 3... go
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 7:22 am
You really are this **** stupid.*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ Okay... explain what the **** this reply...
... has to do with the topic of the OP.
1, 2, 3... go
It isn't my burden.
1 Jun 2024 7:49 am
I accept your concession.Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ You really are this **** stupid.
It isn't my burden.
That's three for the morning.
I'm gonna take a break and have another coffee and some wheat toast.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 7:49 am
Accept my condolences.*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ I accept your concession.
That's three for the morning.
I'm gonna take a break and have another coffee and some wheat toast.
1 Jun 2024 9:04 am
1 Jun 2024 9:08 am
Would you settle for infamous?
1 Jun 2024 9:10 am
Condolences?
You've lost it dude.
LOL
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 9:12 am
Concession?
Are you cray?
1 Jun 2024 9:15 am
You offered condolences when I said I was going to have a coffee and some wheat toast...
Most people would think that rather odd.
LOL
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 9:24 am
I think your habit of asserting concessions odd.*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ You offered condolences when I said I was going to have a coffee and some wheat toast...
Most people would think that rather odd.
LOL
1 Jun 2024 9:32 am
When it's obvious you've given up the argument, it's the only polite thing to do.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
1 Jun 2024 9:35 am
To whom is it "obvious"?*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ When it's obvious you've given up the argument, it's the only polite thing to do.
The one constantly demanding elaboration?
I don't really see that.
1 Jun 2024 9:39 am
It would stand to reason that if I were the one accepting your concession, then I would be the one it was obvious too.Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ To whom is it "obvious"?
The one constantly demanding elaboration?
I don't really see that.
Are you that dense or are you just being obtuse?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Who is online
In total there are 11519 users online :: 2 registered, 14 bots, and 11503 guests
Registered users: SouthernFried, Cannonpointer
Bots: Bolt, MicroMessenger, GPTBot, ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, LCC, Googlebot, CriteoBot, Applebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7