No.....I took note of your delusional retale.*rippy38 » 06 Jun 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ So... you admit to calling me "stalky" for a week, and then getting offended when I called you a stalker today.
And you call me manic?
Classic.
I provided the links to my sources. You not liking them is irrelevant as your agreement is not a requirement.
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
Cohen stipulated to the facts of the election offense with his guilty plea in 2018.
I believe the statute of limitations was restarted with Hope's sworn testimony.
Don't waste my time.Beekeeper » 06 Jun 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ PSsssst. ****. You don't get a Trump conviction or even CHARGES when another LIAR AND THIEF pleads GUILTY to his crimes. There is NO GUILT BY ASSOCIATION which is basically all you **** HAVE!!
Watch how FAST this gets overturned on 6th Amendment violations ALONE!! Seeing how the FORMER CHAIR OF THE FEC was DENIED the ability to testify what the FEC LAWS SAY about NDA's and LEGAL EXPENSES for one!! ADD TO THIS, you as a DEFENDENT MUST KNOW the charges being used against you- and that means ALL OF THEM- and you don't get to spring them on the defense in the CLOSING ARGUMENTS!! PERIOD!! Which is exactly what happened, so there's that alone that means VERDICT OVERTURNED AND CASE REMANDED!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This TANTRUN you are going to throw is going to be MASSIVE, so you better stock up on bite guards, tissue, and crayons and coloring books. You'll need a LOT of each.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Don't retell, or I will humiliate you.ConsRule » 06 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I provided the links to my sources. You not liking them is irrelevant as your agreement is not a requirement.
I understand if you're just making **** up about the statute of limitations. Until you cite a source for them resetting, we'll just assume you pulled that bit of "wisdom" out of your ***.
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't retell, or I will humiliate you.
Your mouth worked hard for this.
Savor it.
You had the wrong data set AND your math was wrong.
It was New York Statute 17 152 which doesn't apply.
If it is one of the 3 step ups it does.
SECTION 17-152Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ If it is one of the 3 step ups it does.
Merchan was at liberty to reject any or all.
False records.Cedar » 06 Jun 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ SECTION 17-152Conspiracy to promote or prevent electionElection (ELN) CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE 17, TITLE 1 § 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more
persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to
a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by
one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
What was the unlawful means?
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't waste my time.
You don't know anything worth sharing.
The Fed works a different way. They beat the **** out of you with the threat of bankrupting your family into a homeless shelter and/or threatening to jail a loved one on a 7-year-old overlooked tax infraction they found.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Beat the **** out of him first, then he can appeal.
A case of election law violations and false business records is also instructive here. In People v. Norman, 6 Misc. 3d 1035(A), 800 N.Y.S.2d 353 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County 2004), the Supreme Court of Kings County held that a defendant causing false information to be entered by a campaign committee and the Board of elections was sufficient to satisfy intent for falsifying business records. The court explained: Since it is a crime indeed a felony for a person ‘acting on behalf of a candidate or political committee [to] knowingly and willfully … solicit any person to make [expenditures in connection with the nomination for election or election of any candidate] for the purpose of evading the contribution limitations of [article 14 of the Election Law],’ Election Law § 14-126(4), this evidence is also sufficient to establish that the defendant concealed these solicitations and contributions from the treasurer and thus prevented the making of a true entry, and caused the omission of a true entry in the records of both the [campaign] Committee and the Board of elections with ‘intent to defraud includ[ing] an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.’ Penal Law § 175.10.Cedar » 06 Jun 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑Grasp them straws.
I'm not sure clerical errors would apply.
That has never happened.Beekeeper » 06 Jun 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh really now?? So why is your *** BEING KICKED MASSIVELY and this is all you have??
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You had the wrong data set AND your math was wrong.
But, baby girl, you sure ran your flaps.
No, it isn't..ConsRule » 06 Jun 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ This is about your comment related to the statute of limitations resetting...nothing else.
Diversion attempt: FAIL!
Link to your source for the reset? Or are you making **** up?
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2024, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't..
It's about stapling your leaking pissflaps shut.
ConsRule » 06 Jun 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Poor wee baby...got caught making **** up and now has to resort to playing games.
Don't worry, you may still reach a maturity level greater than that of a 5 year-old.
Connie,Poor wee baby...got caught making **** up and now has to resort to playing games.