**** idiot.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ So that you can niggle about the source? **** you, *** - google it.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Yes yes - and hillary did nothing wrong - that was PROVEN. And the videos showing the investigator swearing otherwise are YOUTUBE - which is russian disinformation. And hunter's laptop? Russian disinformation.Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Posobeic is the Useful Idiot of a transparent misinformation operation.
That makes you a rube's rube.
Gee, I missed the lie.....typical Democrat ****.maineman » 12 Jun 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ minor league.
Here's the real all-star:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... our-years/
Beekeeper » 12 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Even though Matthew Colangelo is only now sitting in a courtroom formally opposing the former president, his work has for years involved investigating Trump and his businesses, despite working for different prosecutorial offices at varying levels of government. Colangelo's sudden switch from top DOJ official to a role with the DA's office in the Big Apple has particularly raised eyebrows.
"It's very odd. It’s usually the other way around. . . . And frankly, that sounds to me like somebody who thought, 'Ah, here's an opportunity to go and get Donald Trump,'" attorney and former member of the Federal Election Commission, Hans von Spakovsky, told Fox News Digital in a phone interview this month.
So you think your boy and fellow DICK SUCKER, @maineman can provide a LINK to his claim???
Nope!! Just more of his usual **** AND HORSE MANURE without ONE IOTA of proof!!
Fact is, Colangelo left a CUSHY DOJ job for the SOLE PURPOSE of "get Trump". Something he hadn't been able to do in years.
I failed to notice...attorney and former member of the Federal Election Commission, Hans von Spakovsky,
In his VERY NEXT POST, he cried about a source.Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑**** idiot.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ So that you can niggle about the source? **** you, *** - google it.

That's enough hysteria.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes yes - and hillary did nothing wrong - that was PROVEN. And the videos showing the investigator swearing otherwise are YOUTUBE - which is russian disinformation. And hunter's laptop? Russian disinformation.
RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!!!![]()
Suck off, rube - you think a sex change can be accomplished by a declaration. You're not a man. You're a mental midget and a cuck.
Yes...because your sources suck...it's why you won't name them.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ In his VERY NEXT POST, he cried about a source.
Screeched russia russia russia.
That had to BURN when 9s0he slowed down enough to catch it!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So... no more screeching about Russia?
Little queer, I have confuted you with VIDEO of a fellow swearing under oath to what you claimed he never said.Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes...because your sources suck...it's why you won't name them.
You're an imbecile.
Relax, Rube....you've been here before.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ So... no more screeching about Russia?
Did a man slap you or something?
Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Little queer, I have confuted you with VIDEO of a fellow swearing under oath to what you claimed he never said.
And you demanded a transcript because you did not "respect" youtube.
So **** you and your fake source sniveling, you dishonest cocksucker.
the vague description of a youtube video.I have confuted you with VIDEO
Huh.Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ https://medium.com/personal-growth/what ... 2ab4f2aa17
What you eat makes a huge difference in how optimally your body operates. And what you spend time reading and learning equally affects how effectively your mind operates.
Increasingly, we’re filling our heads with soundbites, the mental equivalent of junk. Over a day or even a week, the changes, like those to our belly, are barely noticeable. However, if we extend the timeline to months and years, we face a worrying reality and may find ourselves looking down at the pot-belly of ignorance.
Leveraging vague description with vague description.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Just tell me this. HOW DID IT HAPPEN?
How did they convince a grown man with a university education that a BLATANT fallacy was state of the art science?
We BOTH know there was a time you were more discerning. One wonders what the **** happened to your education, to your credulity, to your ability to smell pure ****.
Huh.
That is the most self-aware answer you have ever been manipulated into giving me, ****.
lol - bitch got dick slapped with a VIDEO, and cried that he only would trust a transcript.
I felt you described how you fell from grace with reasonable clarity, ****.Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Leveraging vague description with vague description.
No one is interested in your retelling...it won't wash away the stain of your vile predilectionsCannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ lol - bitch got dick slapped with a VIDEO, and cried that he only would trust a transcript.![]()
![]()
Actually, they are all interested in it - it gives them better context for the contempt they feel for you.Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ No one is interested in your retelling...it won't wash away the stain of your vile predilections
Zeets2 » 12 Jun 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ What you consider bias on my part is nothing more than using facts to destroy the most idiotic and boring claims of the left, particularly but not exclusively against Trump.
So why don't you tell me which of those Trump "lies" you claim that you would like me to tear apart?
Can you name one?maineman » 12 Jun 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ why don't I? Because it sounds like a terribly boring thing to do on a Wednesday afternoon.
Are you suggesting that none of the 30K false or misleading statements documented by the WaPo are actually false and misleading? You claim you can tear all of them apart? If so. I'd have you start at the beginning of their list and prove your mettle by tearing apart the first 30 of them, which is a little bit less than one tenth of one percent. Ready? GO!