you first...
Grooooooooooaaaaan.
Too bad they're lying.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ I Didn’t Think Biden Affected Crime Rates. I Was Wrong.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... -was-wrong
Former Trump adviser on Biden’s economy: ‘I would be bragging about it, too’
https://thehill.com/business/4430167-ku ... n-economy/
So many Mea Culpas, so little time.
.
Actually, what I want to know is why the conjobs are so pissed off at Biden when Biden is just a ROTM neoliberal.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ I Didn’t Think Biden Affected Crime Rates. I Was Wrong.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... -was-wrong
Former Trump adviser on Biden’s economy: ‘I would be bragging about it, too’
https://thehill.com/business/4430167-ku ... n-economy/
So many Mea Culpas, so little time.
.
what specific policies implemented by joe are accountable for the perceived drop?
What have you got to trade?ROG62 » 19 Jun 2024, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑ what specific policies implemented by joe are accountable for the perceived drop?
Why, because I gave you the facts on the phony Biden crime stats you'd prefer to believe?
no trade here numbnuts...you go on and on like the little bitch you are about the corpse, then face planting at every turn...
Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ Why, because I gave you the facts on the phony Biden crime stats you'd prefer to believe?
Or do you simply prefer that everyone else remain as gullibly ignorant as you on the subject?
The answer to that is obvious!
Care to dispute the facts I posted and why you refuse to accept the reality?
Or would you rather simply run away as you normally do?
Why, because I gave you the facts on the phony Biden crime stats you'd prefer to believe?
Vaya con huevos!ROG62 » 20 Jun 2024, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ no trade here numbnuts...you go on and on like the little bitch you are about the corpse, then face planting at every turn...
flap some gums on what specific policies joe has implemented that has proven to a drop in crime nationally...
Sure it was DOJ/FBI data that had been intentionally acquired using new criteria he imposed in 2021 IN WHICH MANY LARGE US CITIES DID NOT PROVIDE THEIR DATA, and so they simply did not include them when they released the national figures.Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2024, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot.
That's FBI data....
Tell me what, specifically, you've been told is missing.
Bad data from the FBI mislead about crime
Washington Examiner By Mark Morgan and Sean Kennedy
The fourth quarter 2023 crime report from the FBI, the federal government’s keeper of crime data, is unreliable at best and deceptive at worst.
The FBI’s preliminary 2023 data show murder declined by 13.2% across the country and violent crime dropped 5.7% compared to 2022 levels. Various news headlines have reported the FBI’s numbers unquestioningly, claiming murder is “plummeting” and violent crime “declined significantly” to pre-pandemic levels.
But these latest figures warrant skepticism, as we outline in a new report. In fact, violent crime is up substantially from 2019 levels, and last year’s apparent drop is less significant than it appears.
Part of the problem is how police departments report offenses to the FBI. The FBI asked, then demanded, that law enforcement agencies “transition” away from the system they used for decades to a new, more detailed but onerous one. The 2021 mandate to use NIBRS to submit crime data proved a disaster as overstretched departments, especially in large cities, failed to reach compliance and thus did not submit data.
In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data.
Why bother even showing up here if all you can do is play duck and run every time you are asked to back up your assertions and your wishful thinking based beliefs with solid proof...?
Start a threadGHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jun 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ Why bother even showing up here if all you can do is play duck and run every time you are asked to back up your assertions and your wishful thinking based beliefs with solid proof...?
When do you plan on showing proof that Trump raped Carroll...?Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ Start a thread
State your hypothesis.
Post your evidence.
Cower.
The Washington Examiner...Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ Sure it was DOJ/FBI data that had been intentionally acquired using new criteria he imposed in 2021 IN WHICH MANY LARGE US CITIES DID NOT PROVIDE THEIR DATA, and so they simply did not include them when they released the national figures.
Are you dumb enough to believe that you can ignore the high crime stats of cities like NY, Chicago, and LA among others AS THEY DID, and your resulting figures for the country would be anywhere close to being truthful or accurate?
Read the facts, idiot:
Why would I bother trying to do so to someone who doesn't understand the distinction between "civil" and "criminal"?GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jun 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ When do you plan on showing proof that Trump raped Carroll...?
You can't expect people to buy into anything else you have to say about anything until you admit you have zero proof.
Most people here see you as a time wasting, mentally ill liar Dude.
When do you plan on showing proof that Trump raped Carroll...?Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Why would I bother trying to do so to someone who doesn't understand the distinction between "civil" and "criminal"?
Why do I need to relitigate a case already decided?
You've demonstrated that you don't know anything, haven't bothered to learn, and now want to bleat stupid at what has already been resolved.GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jun 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ When do you plan on showing proof that Trump raped Carroll...?
You can't expect people to buy into anything else you have to say about anything until you admit you have zero proof.
Most people here see you as a time wasting, mentally ill liar Dude.
Of course the numbers of the corrupt DOJ and FBI are better, moron! You think Biden WANTED the actual figures shown that would expose his complete failure with the facts that the entire country knows to be true regarding the rampant crime wave he's allowed?Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ The Washington Examiner...
In December 2015, the CJIS Advisory Policy Board endorsed the NIBRS transition and the FBI Director approved in February 2016. The FBI announced to law enforcement agencies it would transition to the more comprehensive NIBRS collection. Last year, the data was exclusively collected via NIBRS. Both the NIBRS, 2021 and Crime in the United States (CIUS), 2021 releases were based solely on NIBRS submissions. While in the transition period to NIBRS, the UCR Program published a limited release of the traditional CIUS, 2021, along with a trend study comparing 2020 and 2021 crime data using a selection of the new NIBRS estimation data.
For the 2022 data year, to provide nationally representative data, the FBI accepted NIBRS data and SRS data submissions from agencies. NIBRS data was submitted by 13,293 law enforcement agencies whose jurisdictions covered more than 256 million United States inhabitants. SRS data was accepted from 2,431 non-transitioned agencies representing 55,441,278 inhabitants. These agencies added an additional 16.6% population coverage, bringing the total national population coverage for Crime in the Nation, 2022 to 93.5%.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases ... statistics
Not only are Biden's numbers better, they're more reliable.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics September 2023
Criminal Victimization, 2022
by Alexandra Thompson and Susannah N. Tapp, PhD, BJS Statisticians
The rate of violent victimization in the United States rose to 23.5 victimizations per 1,000 persons age 12 or older in 2022, after reaching a 30-year low of 16.4–16.5 during 2020–2021 (figure 1). Violent victimization includes rape or sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault, and simple assault. Despite the recent increase, the last three decades saw an overall decline in the violent victimization rate from 79.8 to 23.5 per 1,000 from 1993 to 2022.The violent victimization rate increased from 16.5 victimizations per 1,000 persons in 2021 to 23.5 per 1,000 in 2022. From 1993 to 2022, the overall rate of violent victimization declined from 79.8 to 23.5 victimizations per 1,000 persons age 12 or older. In 2022, about 2 in 5 (42%) violent victimizations were reported to police. Motor vehicle theft victimization increased from a rate of 4.3 victimizations per 1,000 households in 2021 to 5.5 per 1,000 in 2022. About 10% of violent victimizations involved a firearm in 2022, an increase from 2021 (7%). Victims received assistance from a victim service provider in 9% of violent victimizations in 2022. In 2022, about 1.24% (3.5 million) of persons age 12 or older nationwide experienced at least one violent crime.
When do you plan on showing proof that Trump raped Carroll...?Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ You've demonstrated that you don't know anything, haven't bothered to learn, and now want to bleat stupid at what has already been resolved.
You don't know ANYTHING about the case presented against The Rapist, the witnesses or their sworn testimony, nor would you watch the deposition which makes clear why The Rapist didn't take the stand.
What are you owed?