Liberal Forum

A federal judge on Monday issued an order temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s new Title IX transgender rule in an additional six states, a rule that sparked controversy for changing the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity” and giving female-identifying male students access to girls’ lockers and bathrooms.

 “There are two sexes: male and female,” begins the memorandum and opinion written by U.S. District Judge Danny C. Reeves, filed on June 17 at the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, Covington Division.

 The judge’s order grants a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the new rule in six states: Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The rule has also been blocked in at least five other states.

 Judge Reeves found that the Education Department exceeded its statutory authority in setting the new rules and acted in a way that was “arbitrary and capricious.”

https://www.ntd.com/federal-title-ix-tr ... dium=email

“There are two sexes: male and female,” 

wow, a judge who understands biology 101...
 

ROG62 » 19 Jun 2024, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 5:27 am

A federal judge on Monday issued an order temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s new Title IX transgender rule in an additional six states, a rule that sparked controversy for changing the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity” and giving female-identifying male students access to girls’ lockers and bathrooms.

 “There are two sexes: male and female,” begins the memorandum and opinion written by U.S. District Judge Danny C. Reeves, filed on June 17 at the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, Covington Division.

 The judge’s order grants a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the new rule in six states: Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The rule has also been blocked in at least five other states.

 Judge Reeves found that the Education Department exceeded its statutory authority in setting the new rules and acted in a way that was “arbitrary and capricious.”

https://www.ntd.com/federal-title-ix-tr ... dium=email

“There are two sexes: male and female,” 

wow, a judge who understands biology 101...

NTD is one of the leading authorities on China in the news industry. In collaboration with its sister media The Epoch Times,



:rofl:  

Dude's gonna get smoked on appeal.

ROG62 » 19 Jun 2024, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 5:27 am

A federal judge on Monday issued an order temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s new Title IX transgender rule in an additional six states, a rule that sparked controversy for changing the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity” and giving female-identifying male students access to girls’ lockers and bathrooms.

 “There are two sexes: male and female,” begins the memorandum and opinion written by U.S. District Judge Danny C. Reeves, filed on June 17 at the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, Covington Division.

 The judge’s order grants a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the new rule in six states: Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The rule has also been blocked in at least five other states.

 Judge Reeves found that the Education Department exceeded its statutory authority in setting the new rules and acted in a way that was “arbitrary and capricious.”

https://www.ntd.com/federal-title-ix-tr ... dium=email

“There are two sexes: male and female,” 

wow, a judge who understands biology 101...

That's good news.  Somebody is looking out for the rights of women.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 9:57 am

NTD is one of the leading authorities on China in the news industry. In collaboration with its sister media The Epoch Times,

 

Dude's gonna get smoked on appeal.

I see you have no opinion on the decision and cannot refute the statements in the ruling, so you go for attacking the source. 
 

ConsRule » 19 Jun 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:13 am

I see you have no opinion on the decision and cannot refute the statements in the ruling, so you go for attacking the source.

I clearly do.

This Federalist Society hack is gonna get horsewhipped on appeal.
Like that Fundie in Robes in Texas..


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:20 am

I clearly do.

This Federalist Society hack is gonna get horsewhipped on appeal.
Like that Fundie in Robes in Texas..

Over the years it has become quite clear you do not support cisgender women’s rights.

Can any of the "NORMIE CUCKSERVATIVES" who do not believe in any such [[[JWO]]] POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA explain why there is such a coordinated effort worldwide to promote queerness and to enforce "language control" that pertains to all things queer related...?
Why should all things queer related get so much non stop, instantaneous priority / air time on the [[[JWO]]] controlled MSM if there is no such agenda...?

*Huey » 19 Jun 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:26 am

Over the years it has become quite clear you do not support cisgender women’s rights.

As defined by whom?

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:53 am

As defined by whom?

Note the word. Cisgender.  

denoting or relating to a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex registered for them at birth; not transgender.

*Huey » 19 Jun 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:54 am

Note the word. Cisgender.  

denoting or relating to a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex registered for them at birth; not transgender.

No...

Who is defining their interests?

I'm reasonably sure several of these kids were of cisgender moms born.


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:55 am

No...

Who is defining their interests?

I'm reasonably sure several of these kids were of cisgender moms born.

Cisgender women.

They want to play their own sports free of men.  Have their own clubs. Etc etc etc.  guys like you don’t want the, to be able to do that.  

I guess you were spurned by too ma y of them

*Huey » 19 Jun 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 10:58 am

Cisgender women.

They want to play their own sports free of men.  Have their own clubs. Etc etc etc.  guys like you don’t want the, to be able to do that.  

I guess you were spurned by too ma y of them

Do you have any data?

I guess you were spurned by too ma y of them

I only ever paid for one...

You?

anyone got the balls to take a stab at this?

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 11:00 am

Do you have any data?

I only ever paid for one...

You?

A couple.  Long deployments.  A couple of days of what you know as R&R.  

sootedupCyndi » 19 Jun 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 11:04 am

anyone got the balls to take a stab at this?

 
 

Evil always prevails in modern day Murica.

Thank God for Russia and China. The adults in the room....

while the west sews cocks onto little girls.

Sumela » 19 Jun 2024, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 12:23 pm

don't you laugh- something doesn't look right here.   albeit for me to judge.
 

sootedupCyndi » 19 Jun 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 11:04 am

anyone got the balls to take a stab at this?

Put her up against NBA level talent and get back to me.

sootedupCyndi » 19 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm

don't you laugh- something doesn't look right here.   albeit for me to judge.

Shes a man, baby!


 

Sumela » 19 Jun 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 12:38 pm

Shes a man, baby!

 no wonder the black lesbos are mad-  maybe it's more then black jealosy?