The only trans-sexual I ever met was in band.
No, dickwipe - you insist they are bigots if their "choice" opposes your agenda.
And your cowardice removes their ability to volunteer, making their choice dangerous to their wellbeing and human dignity.
Good boy. Now sit.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Standards are established by qualified professionals.
And now you lie through your **** biscuits.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You hear horror stories of bearded men rampaging across fields of broken little girls.
That's not what's happening.
More dishonesty. Lia(r) Thomas still has his dick - and even if he didn't, yes, it matters, you anti-science little weasel. Going through male puberty is an advantage - which explains why Venus Williams demolishes every female tennis player and was beaten by the 203rd ranked male tennis player, you dishonest cocksucker.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would they?
Does it matter if the person standing across from them once stood to pee?
She would get punked by male players, fruitcake. And if she WOULDN'T, she is a one in a billion outlier - making all reference to her meaningless to this issue. Reliance on outliers is the argumentation of trailer trash.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ There are no rules governing physical inequality in HS sports.
My friends' daughter was a d1 volleyball player. She's 6' 2"...when she took off, the entire gym shook..
In high school her job was to hammer any errant ball around the net into some kid's face.
According to the proud dad, a pediatric surgeon.
More dishonesty. Lia(r) Thomas still has his dick - and even if he didn't, yes, it matters, you anti-science little weasel. Going through male puberty is an advantage - which explains why Venus Williams demolishes every female tennis player and was beaten by the 203rd ranked male tennis player, you dishonest cocksucker.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would they?
Does it matter if the person standing across from them once stood to pee?
She would get punked by male players, fruitcake. And if she WOULDN'T, she is a one in a billion outlier - making all reference to her meaningless to this issue.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ There are no rules governing physical inequality in HS sports.
My friends' daughter was a d1 volleyball player. She's 6' 2"...when she took off, the entire gym shook..
In high school her job was to hammer any errant ball around the net into some kid's face.
According to the proud dad, a pediatric surgeon.
No, because it is for WOMEN, you misogynistic piece of ****.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑Yea..
Caise your mom needed something to get you out of the house.
Translation: Since there are some extreme-outlier girls with advantages over other girls, those other girls should be forced to compete with boys, who have outlier advantages NORMALLY.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No...that's the myth.
I have a friend, works for Customs at Logan, who would have beaten the **** out of me through 11th grade...I picture her bearing down on some avg hs girl on a lacrosse field and shudder.
What matters is the level of your cowardice, ape.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ What matters is whether it changes the incidence of injuries in hs sports.
The PRIDE OF BROWN!!!
you are the one that keeps talking how girls can beat boys. you say that girls will beat boys in field hockey.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ The only trans-sexual I ever met was in band.
I don't know that football appeals to a large number of girls.
But field hockey is played by men in much of the world.
Referencing outliers - real or invented - is one of their sleazier tactics. Essentially, his argument is that since there are some rare female outliers, girls have no right to complain about their sports being flooded with people whose prowess dwarfs those outliers.
Not nearly often enough, piece of ****.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ It certainly does...I played contact sports, small high school. I've been knocled out.
Is THAT what gets girls scholarships - participation, you dishonest piece of ****?
Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2024, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Translation: Since there are some extreme-outlier girls with advantages over other girls, those other girls should be forced to compete with boys, who have outlier advantages NORMALLY.
Misogynist piece of ****.
When these arguments first started, it had not yet progressed to the insanity of forcing girls to compete with boy, men with women. And this piece of **** used to say we were wrong in predicting this would happen. He pretended this was something he would never support. But he underestimated his own cuckery.
Well, there's your problem right there, you **** clown.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2024, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Referencing outliers - real or invented - is one of their sleazier tactics. Essentially, his argument is that since there are some rare female outliers, girls have no right to complain about their sports being flooded with people whose prowess dwarfs those outliers.
So is rape, you misogynistic piece of ****. Which is why women's showers are rightly sex-segregated.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑
But field hockey is played by men in much of the world.
No...I never said that.jerrab » 21 Jun 2024, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑ you are the one that keeps talking how girls can beat boys. you say that girls will beat boys in field hockey.
That is in fact his distilled argument - and it is precisely the level of argument you will find in any trailer park in any podunk town in America.jerrab » 21 Jun 2024, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ because one girl out of a thousand can beat a weak boy, all girls should compete against all boys.
The human garbage will pretend he is an advocate for women's rights.jerrab » 21 Jun 2024, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ girls should not complain.
it cannot get anymore sexist than that.