Liberal Forum

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/21/politics ... index.html

8 - 1...

Free Ride dissenting.

What a **** blockhead that man is...
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:16 am

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/21/politics ... index.html

8 - 1...

Free Ride dissenting.

What a **** blockhead that man is...

Just stops them from legally having a gun.  They can still get and have one.  Another law that doesn't fix anything.
 

ConsRule » 21 Jun 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:20 am

Just stops them from legally having a gun.  They can still get and have one.  Another law that doesn't fix anything.

Another example of an uninformed imbecile missing the point.

Again.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:16 am

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/21/politics ... index.html

8 - 1...

Free Ride dissenting.

What a **** blockhead that man is...
 

 

Do you have a problem with the decision?

What did your daughter say when you told her men had a right to be in her shower and play sports against her, cuck?

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:16 am

Put Your Hands Above Your Head and Back Slooooowly Away From That Idiocy...

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:21 am

Another example of an uninformed imbecile missing the point.

Again.

I didn't miss the point.  I was MAKING a point.

You fail to comprehend a post...again.

Poor BeastlyVagina
 

ConsRule » 21 Jun 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:34 am

I didn't miss the point.  I was MAKING a point.

You fail to comprehend a post...again.

Poor BeastlyVagina

You hacked up something stupid.

You do a lot of that.

 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:22 am

Do you have a problem with the decision?

We really need to get this "question/case" thingy worked out, Sheilagh...

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:38 am

We really need to get this "question/case" thingy worked out, Sheilagh...

 

Haven't offered any narrative that would indicate your support or issues you may have with it.

I have no issue with it.  Do you?  

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:36 am

You hacked up something stupid.

You do a lot of that.

No...what I posted was 100% correct. You're just not adult enough to admit it.

Poor BeastlyVagina
 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:41 am

Haven't offered any narrative that would indicate your support or issues you may have with it.

I have no issue with it.  Do you?

this is about YOUR question/case thingy.

I have no issue with it.  Do you?

Did you read Free Ride's dissenting comment?

 

ConsRule » 21 Jun 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:42 am

No...what I posted was 100% correct. You're just not adult enough to admit it.

Poor BeastlyVagina

Since all you did was assert, all I need to do is assert to the contrary.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:44 am

this is about YOUR question/case thingy.

Did you read Free Ride's dissenting comment?

Nope.  You will have to tell me who free rides it then I will go read it. 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:46 am

Nope.  You will have to tell me who free rides it then I will go read it.

Read the citation, then come back with your *******....


 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:49 am

Read the citation, then come back with your *******....

I don't know anything about someone named free ride but I did read the dissent of Thomas.  I disagree with him.  Like drug addicts allowing those guilty of domestic violence of owning a firearm is dangerous. 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 10:53 am

I don't know anything about someone named free ride but I did read the dissent of Thomas.  I disagree with him.  Like drug addicts allowing those guilty of domestic violence of owning a firearm is dangerous.

But his dissent insists that's irrelevant.....why?

Because history.

But if the rest of SCOTUS just straight up taintpunted him on the theory, where does that leave Originalist cheese like Heller and Dobbs?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 11:04 am

But his dissent insists that's irrelevant.....why?

Because history.

But if the rest of SCOTUS just straight up taintpunted him on the theory, where does that leave Originalist cheese like Heller and Dobbs?
 

 

THat's two questions.  

Make your case.  What pisses you off is I am man enough to disagree with people you perceive to be on my side of the aisle.  Grow a pair, Eunuch.  
 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 11:08 am

THat's two questions.  

Make your case.  What pisses you off is I am man enough to disagree with people you perceive to be on my side of the aisle.  Grow a pair, Eunuch.

And I answered the first.

You've made my case....by refusing to answer the question.

You've admitted to it.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 11:04 am

But his dissent insists that's irrelevant.....why?

Because history.

But if the rest of SCOTUS just straight up taintpunted him on the theory, where does that leave Originalist cheese like Heller and Dobbs?

It leaves them in place.  I believe they will remain in place for decades (at least) and will probably never be overturned.  I have no problem with SCOTUS overturning wrongly decided precedent, and I'm fairly certain you agree with that, I don't think the ruling you mentioned fall into that category.
 

ConsRule » 21 Jun 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2024, 11:13 am

It leaves them in place.  I believe they will remain in place for decades (at least) and will probably never be overturned.  I have no problem with SCOTUS overturning wrongly decided precedent, and I'm fairly certain you agree with that, I don't think the ruling you mentioned fall into that category.

No logic.

But thanks for sharing your inarticulate feefees.