Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll take your quotes...
You're an idiot. It's a guarantee of success...
No, I will add my own commentary...Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You have to take other's quotes because you have no thoughts of your own.
Seriously, you cannot provide even the most modest of intelligent thought. That's why you have to copy/paste to debate.
You can't debate.
Walz killed it in that movie...stole it flat out...Cannonpointer » 23 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it's, "That is a bingo."
Wait I checked. You just a bingo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugpg8XruhVk
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom As an internet actual trillionaire (also internet actual hitler), I am wondering if maybe I'm TOO rich for the club.ROG62 » 23 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, there's got to be a cutoff...I mean, you've got the Arnault, Musk, Besos, Zuckerberg level, and then there's the Trump, Sarath Ratanavadi and Patrick Ryan at the bottom....
will they let every billionaire in? If so, I'm on it...got a ways to go, but if my shopping days don't run out, I'll be in good shape...
damn, potentially a problem...albeit cyberbucks s/b pretty easy to hide...Cannonpointer » 23 Jun 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ As an internet actual trillionaire (also internet actual hitler), I am wondering if maybe I'm TOO rich for the club.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Well, he had what every actor dreams of - a completely amoral character with plenty of good lines and a director like Tarantino.
I will demonstrate that your OP does not reach Level 1.Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Here is what your commentary looks like:
Derrrr...Trump and MAGA are morons...derrr.....derrr....
Now that is some level 2+ **** right there.
I mean, without narrative, you'd REALLY look stupid.
Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I will demonstrate that your OP does not reach Level 1.
No chance of that.
Semper "Because blackvegetable.....".*rippy38 » 23 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ No chance of that.
As soon as I see your name at the top, I know it's already gone off course.
Hell, you can't even stay on topic on your own threads.
a regular trifecta....Cannonpointer » 23 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, he had what every actor dreams of - a completely amoral character with plenty of good lines and a director like Tarantino.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I will demonstrate that by reconciling your OP with facts.
I accept your concession, one more time.Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Semper "Because blackvegetable.....".
Yes, I understand.
Ok ****. I guess I am going to have to embarrass you again. Let's do this. Here is my comment from the OP. Then I will break it down according to the Bloom's Taxonomy. I have labeled the sentences with numbers so it will be easier to refer to.Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I will demonstrate that your OP does not reach Level 1.
Thesis: Number 11) I am uncertain that it was the min wage hike that is responsible for the downfall of businesses there. It was the straw the broke the camel's back, but it didn't start it. 2)Over a decade ago employees were able to live in a relatively nice condo, afford a car, and live in a decent neighborhood. 3)This was before the min wage increase. 4)Now they can't afford it and driven out of neighborhoods that were once nice. 5)This downfall began before the increase. 6)The farmers are having a hard time keeping up with the costs and now with the min wage increase, it's almost impossible for them to survive.

You also "answer all questions", allegedly.*rippy38 » 23 Jun 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I accept your concession, one more time.
That three today, without even trying.
Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I will demonstrate that by reconciling your OP with facts.
Since you used quotes, I'm going to demand that you show your work... otherwise, continue to wear that liar badge proudly.
1) You assert your uncertainty, then offer a bold assertion....unrelated to anything previously established.Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok ****. I guess I am going to have to embarrass you again. Let's do this. Here is my comment from the OP. Then I will break it down according to the Bloom's Taxonomy. I have labeled the sentences with numbers so it will be easier to refer to.
Thesis: Number 1
Proposition 1: number 2
Proposition 2: Number 3, 4, and 5.
Conclusion: Number 6
Now let's break it down with the Bloom's Taxonomy.
Level 1: Number 2, 3, 5
Level 2: Number 6
Level 3: Number 1