Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 23 Jun 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:23 pm

Since you used quotes, I'm going to demand that you show your work... otherwise, continue to wear that liar badge proudly.

LOL

So you too consider such a suggestion absurd.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:31 pm

So you too consider such a suggestion absurd.

I never said that I "answer all questions"... 

nod
 

*rippy38 » 23 Jun 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:32 pm

I never said that I "answer all questions"... 

nod

And remember, he claims you don't answer questions if you don't repost something on demand, or if you refuse to answer a question you have previously answered.  

Like his primary source question.  I will NEVER answer that one again.  

*rippy38 » 23 Jun 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:32 pm

I never said that I "answer all questions"... 

nod

What DID you say?

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:29 pm

1) You assert your uncertainty, then offer a bold assertion....unrelated to anything previously established.

The rest is just taking at face value what the FOX anecdote relates to reflect a general condition....which is a myth.

There is no thought in the OP.

Wrong. You are now pretending that you even read it. Read it again. I proved the bold assertion. 

And of course there are thoughts. Who the **** do you think wrote that? 

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:44 pm

Wrong. You are now pretending that you even read it. Read it again. I proved the bold assertion. 

And of course there are thoughts. Who the **** do you think wrote that?

There are two sentences in #1, the first of which establishes your uncertainty. What follows in the next sentence cannot be a conclusion derived from the first.

Unless that conclusion is that you're a moron.

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:48 pm

There are two sentences in #1, the first of which establishes your uncertainty. What follows in the next sentence cannot be a conclusion derived from the first.

Unless that conclusion is that you're a moron.

My uncertainty is the level 2+ since I am countering the article. They claimed that the min wage hike was causing the financial downfall of the businesses. I countered it by proving that it wasn't. The downfall began before the min wage hike. The increase exasperated it , but it didn't cause it. I stated that people were living fine with the previous min wage about a decade ago. Then Bidenomics came around and people started suffering. This was before the hike...per which I demonstrated. 

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:03 pm

My uncertainty is the level 2+ since I am countering the article. They claimed that the min wage hike was causing the financial downfall of the businesses. I countered it by proving that it wasn't. The downfall began before the min wage hike. The increase exasperated it , but it didn't cause it. I stated that people were living fine with the previous min wage about a decade ago. Then Bidenomics came around and people started suffering. This was before the hike...per which I demonstrated.

I countered it by proving that it wasn't. The downfall began before the min wage hike.

this was asserted, not proven.

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:06 pm

this was asserted, not proven.

So you didn't know that there was inflation problems under Biden? Some things do not need to be said. This is common knowledge you dumb piece of ****. 

Biden's big inflation problem: Prices are now up nearly 20% since he took office

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bidens-b ... 49551.html
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 3:44 pm

What DID you say?

Certainly not that I answer all questions!

You probably plugged your fingers in your ears and lala'd it away when I typed it, so... 

 
 
 

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:03 pm

My uncertainty is the level 2+ since I am countering the article. They claimed that the min wage hike was causing the financial downfall of the businesses. I countered it by proving that it wasn't. The downfall began before the min wage hike. The increase exasperated it , but it didn't cause it. I stated that people were living fine with the previous min wage about a decade ago. Then Bidenomics came around and people started suffering. This was before the hike...per which I demonstrated.

 

I stated that people were living fine with the previous min wage about a decade ago. Then Bidenomics came around and people started suffering. This was before the hike...per which I demonstrated.

no....that's what the person quoted said.

about a decade ago. Then Bidenomics came around

A "decade ago"" would be 2014...

*rippy38 » 23 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm

Certainly not that I answer all questions!

You probably plugged your fingers in your ears and lala'd it away when I typed it, so... 

Perhaps you should read the question again.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:41 pm

no....that's what the person quoted said.

A "decade ago"" would be 2014...

I just showed the numbers from the link. I didn't make those numbers up. The source quoted the government's stats on it.

Like I am surprised that you didn't read it.  

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:14 pm

So you didn't know that there was inflation problems under Biden? Some things do not need to be said. This is common knowledge you dumb piece of ****. 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bidens-b ... 49551.html

I doubt you know what the current inflation rate is.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:52 pm

I doubt you know what the current inflation rate is.

I do. I also know that the prices are much higher. Per the government's stats...that you evidently think is an assertion. 

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:51 pm

I just showed the numbers from the link. I didn't make those numbers up. The source quoted the government's stats on it.

Like I am surprised that you didn't read it.

There are no "government stats" quoted in the excerpt.

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:56 pm

I do. I also know that the prices are much higher. Per the government's stats...that you evidently think is an assertion.

Post it.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:57 pm

Post it.

I JUST **** DID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

READ THE GOD DAMN SOURCE YOU **** MORON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2024, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:57 pm

There are no "government stats" quoted in the excerpt.

Yes, there is. You are illiterate. 
 
 
 

Vegas » 23 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

Yes, there is. You are illiterate.

Post them.