Liberal Forum

Another federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the federal government’s expansion of Title IX, which aims to redefine “sex” to include gender identity and sexual orientation.
 
The latest ruling on July 2 was in the case of “Kansas v. United States Department of Education,” which involves several states and organizations challenging the Department of Education’s (DOE) final rule to redefine “sex,” slated to take effect on August 1.
 
The plaintiffs, including Alaska, Utah, and Wyoming, as well as Moms for Liberty, Young America’s Foundation, and Female Athletes United, argued that the DOE’s new rule exceeds its statutory authority under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
 
They claimed that the rule’s redefinition of “sex” to encompass gender identity and sexual orientation contradicts the original legislative intent and statutory language, which focused on protecting biological women from discrimination.

https://www.ntd.com/federal-court-block ... dium=email

SCOTUS will end up hearing this one for sure....
 
 

ROG62 » 04 Jul 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jul 2024, 1:42 pm

Another federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the federal government’s expansion of Title IX, which aims to redefine “sex” to include gender identity and sexual orientation.
 
The latest ruling on July 2 was in the case of “Kansas v. United States Department of Education,” which involves several states and organizations challenging the Department of Education’s (DOE) final rule to redefine “sex,” slated to take effect on August 1.
 
The plaintiffs, including Alaska, Utah, and Wyoming, as well as Moms for Liberty, Young America’s Foundation, and Female Athletes United, argued that the DOE’s new rule exceeds its statutory authority under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
 
They claimed that the rule’s redefinition of “sex” to encompass gender identity and sexual orientation contradicts the original legislative intent and statutory language, which focused on protecting biological women from discrimination.

https://www.ntd.com/federal-court-block ... dium=email

SCOUS will end up hearing this one for sure....

Umm, lessee how long that lasts.

ROG62 » 04 Jul 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jul 2024, 1:42 pm

Another federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the federal government’s expansion of Title IX, which aims to redefine “sex” to include gender identity and sexual orientation.
 
The latest ruling on July 2 was in the case of “Kansas v. United States Department of Education,” which involves several states and organizations challenging the Department of Education’s (DOE) final rule to redefine “sex,” slated to take effect on August 1.
 
The plaintiffs, including Alaska, Utah, and Wyoming, as well as Moms for Liberty, Young America’s Foundation, and Female Athletes United, argued that the DOE’s new rule exceeds its statutory authority under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
 
They claimed that the rule’s redefinition of “sex” to encompass gender identity and sexual orientation contradicts the original legislative intent and statutory language, which focused on protecting biological women from discrimination.

https://www.ntd.com/federal-court-block ... dium=email

SCOUS will end up hearing this one for sure....

That Chevron ruling also plays in here. The rewrite of title 9 put the Health insurance companies on the hook for paying for this crap!  
 

*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm

Umm, lessee how long that lasts.

true...

Fuelman » 04 Jul 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jul 2024, 3:40 pm

That Chevron ruling also plays in here. The rewrite of title 9 put the Health insurance companies on the hook for paying for this crap!

Interesting...