
We have to fight them over there so we won't have to fight them over here.Sumela » 10 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
Wow. Now dammit - this is TRULY UksepSHUanlJIZM.
FORTY PERCENT....
of US military equipment uses inferior chips made by drug addicted Uighur child slave labor in China.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wait....maybe thats Boeing![]()
No wonder Russia has easily taken out 100s of BILLIONS$$ in INFERIOR US WEAPONS in Ukraine.![]()
Every Libtard Progressive at this board is going to be highly offended by the RACIST NATURE of this topic...!!Sumela » 10 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
Wow. Now dammit - this is TRULY UksepSHUanlJIZM.
FORTY PERCENT....
of US military equipment uses inferior chips made by drug addicted Uighur child slave labor in China.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wait....maybe thats Boeing![]()
No wonder Russia has easily taken out 100s of BILLIONS$$ in INFERIOR US WEAPONS in Ukraine.![]()
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/securing ... y-h-nbvmf/
Sir, China keeps the millions of Uighur kids addicted to heroin.Cannonpointer » 10 Jul 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ We have to fight them over there so we won't have to fight them over here.
And no, it's not gonna be "wars for oil." The aughts called and they want their memes back.
I say we take their chips. The good ones, made by sober Uighur children.
Why didn't WE think of using junky preschoolers? We would be right there with China on infrastructure!Sumela » 10 Jul 2024, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir, China keeps the millions of Uighur kids addicted to heroin.
They make a compliant work force
Cannonpointer » 10 Jul 2024, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Why didn't WE think of using junky preschoolers? We would be right there with China on infrastructure!
Sumela » 10 Jul 2024, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes they will. And the neocon con-tards will fist just as furiously. I mean these are just facts. Cold hard facts.
Hard to know what Sky Screamers expect after they **** around, find out, and **** upDeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ There were articles in industry publications 20+ years ago about dependency on foreign governments for military equipment.
The big counter-argument was that countries with heavy business ties won't go to war.
So, no problem.
In the ensuing decades we only went deeper and deeper down that rabbit hole.
All the while people were looking at a bigger, stronger, more assertive China.
What the **** did they expect?
Especially since we weren't getting friendlier with each other along the way...
definitely two pronged full of crossovers...DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ There were articles in industry publications 20+ years ago about dependency on foreign governments for military equipment.
The big counter-argument was that countries with heavy business ties won't go to war.
So, no problem.
In the ensuing decades we only went deeper and deeper down that rabbit hole.
All the while people were looking at a bigger, stronger, more assertive China.
What the **** did they expect?
Especially since we weren't getting friendlier with each other along the way...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom