Finding their patsy.dildo_swaggins » 16 Jul 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Sources tell Fox News that FBI agents are interviewing members of local law enforcement, specifically specifically the officer who saw shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks armed, but retreated away from the building. Crooks opened fire literally seconds later, according to law enforcement sources. There is great frustration in the law enforcement community over the actions of this officer, sources familiar say. Butler County Sheriff Michael Slupe said in interviews with local media that a county deputy confronted Crooks moments before the shooting but ducked for cover when he peered above the edge of the roof and the killer turned the gun on him.
https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/trump ... on-july-16
Getting their stories straight.
ROG62 » 16 Jul 2024, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ A common theme is emerging...Parkland, Uvalde and now this...
Why do you presume to assert what is, or is not, relevant?*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ What cal was the long rifle? AR or not is not relevant.
What cal sidearm was the cop carrying?
Here is an example. It probably wasn't but if it was a M&P AR 15-22 LR and the cop had 45 act the cop wasn't out gunned. Same if it was a .9 mm or a .40.
If it was 5.56 the distance would have eliminated your outgunned idiocy.
And took you where?*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't run to Braintree. I took the train and a family member picked us up.
You are burying the lead, to put it mildly.PhiloBeddo » 16 Jul 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ When he saw the shooter, he should of pulled his gun and engaged. PERIOD. He should quit immediately. He is another Uvalde type.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you presume to assert what is, or is not, relevant?
ExactlyCannonpointer » 16 Jul 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You are burying the lead, to put it mildly.
It is rather far from the issue that some town clown failed to save the day.
The ISSUE is that the SS allowed an amateur gunman to scale a building in broad daylight and draw a bead on their protectee, and THEN they drew a bead on that amateur gunman and held that bead for 42 SECONDS until the gunman did his part, and THEN they took out the gunman without shifting their positions or changing their aim.
How about we deal with the ISSUE, and leave the side **** for the weak ***.
Oh, wait. Are you...
Just abolish qualified immunity and start holding them to the same criminal code they enforce.dildo_swaggins » 16 Jul 2024, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ Defund the cops and see what quality cops you get.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Why would they piss their thongs at the sight of a SPORTING rifle?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑
Of course, it would be regrettable, but surely none of you sissies think freedumb is free, do ya?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you presume to assert what is, or is not, relevant?
We both understand that you don't know ****.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
LIke em or hate em we need cops. But yeah cops getting away with murder is ****.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Just abolish qualified immunity and start holding them to the same crimi9nal code they enforce.
You didn't answer the question.*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ It isn't relevant. It does't fire any quiet or more accurately at that distance. Both semi automatics.
I see you running from the points and questions. Typical
Did YOU read his snopes link, queer?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑
What happened to "Dave"...or whoever you thought I was last time.