As the NYP said:
Oooooooooooo we can’t have kamalahaha in the Oval Office
You could bowl me over with a feather. I never saw this coming.
The games ARE beginning.
I am not sure Newsome wants any part of this cluster ****. If Newsom gets it we will see nothing but ads showing Uhauls leaving CA, the deficit now as compared to the surplus, and the homeless.Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The games ARE beginning.
They announced the democ rat party will hold a "mini-primary," in order to "be fair to voters." After the mini-primary, the super delegates will decide and the voters can **** off.
The purpose of the mini-primary is to dump kamala holla and nominate gruesome newsome.
This was a given since before the debate.
just started lookingCannonpointer » 21 Jul 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The games ARE beginning.
They announced the democ rat party will hold a "mini-primary," in order to "be fair to voters." After the mini-primary, the super delegates will decide and the voters can **** off.
The purpose of the mini-primary is to dump kamala holla and nominate gruesome newsome.
It has also been reported if Harris isn't on the ticket all the money banked at that moment can't be touched. IT can go to charity or a PAC. The problem with the PAC is the campaign can't coordinate with the PAC.Mrkelly » 21 Jul 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ just started looking
seems that the super delegates 15% or so are under no obligation what so ever
the rest are “normally” obligated to a vote
now that Joey has dropped out
they are under no obligation to kamala
gonna be fun to watch
Mrkelly » 21 Jul 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ just started looking
seems that the super delegates 15% or so are under no obligation what so ever
the rest are “normally” obligated to a vote
now that Joey has dropped out
they are under no obligation to kamala
gonna be fun to watch
maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it would be a fatal error to NOT immediately rally around Harris. The last time we held the convention in Chicago, it was a no-drama re-nomination of Bill Clinton, but the time before that, in 1968, there WAS drama and Nixon ended up beating Humphrey. The powers that be need to quickly huddle with Harris and pick the running mate that will help her win. Kelly from Arizona would be good.... astronaut.. Gifford's husband... maybe Whitmer? Buttigieg? Booker? Pick one quick.
maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it would be a fatal error to NOT immediately rally around Harris. The last time we held the convention in Chicago, it was a no-drama re-nomination of Bill Clinton, but the time before that, in 1968, there WAS drama and Nixon ended up beating Humphrey. The powers that be need to quickly huddle with Harris and pick the running mate that will help her win. Kelly from Arizona would be good.... astronaut.. Gifford's husband... maybe Whitmer? Buttigieg? Booker? Pick one quick.