If they planned to keep harris, there would be no need for a "mini-caucus." She has Joey's endorsement.*Huey » 21 Jul 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not sure Newsome wants any post of this cluster ****. If Newsom gets it we will see nothing but ads showing Uhauls leaving CA, the deficit now as compared to the surplus, and the homeless.
Plus, dumping Harris would cause major league issues with the voters.
VeggieTales is busy right now...*Huey » 21 Jul 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah, he ain't. In his addled mind he is the best. But the Donors, the Dem politicians, and the Dem voters know he can't win.
Cue BV.
Yup. Kamala was a novelty VP. I don't believe that even professional handlers want someone as stupid as she is, no matter HOW mean a dick she can suck. At a certain level of stupid, it stops being convenient and starts getting in the handlers' way.Mrkelly » 21 Jul 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ just started looking
seems that the super delegates 15% or so are under no obligation what so ever
the rest are “normally” obligated to a vote
now that Joey has dropped out
they are under no obligation to kamala
gonna be fun to watch
Kameltoe is polling worse than the guy they just forced out.Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup. Kamala was a novelty VP. I don't believe that even professional handlers want someone as stupid as she is, no matter HOW mean a dick she can suck.
I made a hundred bucks when biden dropped. A ******* buddy of mine who came to see me in Brazil took exception when I said biden wouldn't be the nominee. He put a hundred bucks on it.*rippy38 » 21 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Kameltoe is polling worse than the guy they just forced out.
I agree with you assessment from a few months ago.
It's either gonna be Gruesome or the Moose.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ If they planned to keep harris, there would be no need for a "mini-caucus." She has Joey's endorsement.
Or maybe there would - just to put some lipstick on the fact that the democrat base has no say in who is the nominee.
I don't disagree that newsome is a weak candidate. But so is kamala. She cannot possibly win. She ain't worth the gas to go to the polls.
LOL, you pathetic specimen of a man.....you go with a lesbian, black, and a butt-****.....maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it would be a fatal error to NOT immediately rally around Harris. The last time we held the convention in Chicago, it was a no-drama re-nomination of Bill Clinton, but the time before that, in 1968, there WAS drama and Nixon ended up beating Humphrey. The powers that be need to quickly huddle with Harris and pick the running mate that will help her win. Kelly from Arizona would be good.... astronaut.. Gifford's husband... maybe Whitmer? Buttigieg? Booker? Pick one quick.
The Super Delegates at the Democrat convention selecting a Harris/Warren ticket...johndnorth » 21 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Dim Senators up for election said Biden was AOK the day before the debate. The GOP has ammo all the way down the line. Kamala did a great job on the Border: For Trump. Dim votes for Biden in the primary were cast away by the party elite who knew Biden was demented. Will sleepy Joe pardon his entire family before he leaves? Will senile Biden pardon all the Jan 6, protesters? Who will be Kamala's running mate? I recommend the communist from Mass. Pocahontas Warren. An all communist women ticket. DEI taken to the ultimate.
That's the problem with a ******* throwing all his money in, the idiot will suck out on you every time.*rippy38 » 21 Jul 2024, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ The Super Delegates at the Democrat convention selecting a Harris/Warren ticket...
https://i.postimg.cc/Vk8mmPz5/200w-13.gif
lol there you are. Is that how democracy works! Who are “The powers that be”?maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it would be a fatal error to NOT immediately rally around Harris. The last time we held the convention in Chicago, it was a no-drama re-nomination of Bill Clinton, but the time before that, in 1968, there WAS drama and Nixon ended up beating Humphrey. The powers that be need to quickly huddle with Harris and pick the running mate that will help her win. Kelly from Arizona would be good.... astronaut.. Gifford's husband... maybe Whitmer? Buttigieg? Booker? Pick one quick.
You must think that the [[[JWO]]] let's any of these folks call the shots, set the agenda, etc......maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it would be a fatal error to NOT immediately rally around Harris. The last time we held the convention in Chicago, it was a no-drama re-nomination of Bill Clinton, but the time before that, in 1968, there WAS drama and Nixon ended up beating Humphrey. The powers that be need to quickly huddle with Harris and pick the running mate that will help her win. Kelly from Arizona would be good.... astronaut.. Gifford's husband... maybe Whitmer? Buttigieg? Booker? Pick one quick.
BuckNaked » 21 Jul 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ lol there you are. Is that how democracy works! Who are “The powers that be”?
Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ If they planned to keep harris, there would be no need for a "mini-caucus." She has Joey's endorsement.
Or maybe there would - just to put some lipstick on the fact that the democrat base has no say in who is the nominee.
I don't disagree that newsome is a weak candidate. But so is kamala. She cannot possibly win. She ain't worth the gas to go to the polls.
Your party is imploding and you're asking that stupid question?maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ did the Republican party pick Vance or did Trump pick Vance and they rubber stamped it?
Oh, it's just what they needed; An African-American candidate they can pin their hopes on to win back the black vote they lost with a slut who is neither black nor African.*rippy38 » 21 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Kameltoe is polling worse than the guy they just forced out.
I agree with you assessment from a few months ago.
It's either gonna be Gruesome or the Moose.
Omg president vs vice president they followed the procedure what are democrats doing? They have a mess sit back and let’s watch. Trump shoulders demand debate on Fox News and no other networkmaineman » 21 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ did the Republican party pick Vance or did Trump pick Vance and they rubber stamped it?
Who knows or cares?maineman » 21 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ did the Republican party pick Vance or did Trump pick Vance and they rubber stamped it?