Liberal Forum

Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world embroiled in trade wars. Sign up here. U.S. farm bankruptcies in September surged 24% to the highest since 2011 amid strains from President Donald Trump's trade war with China and a year of wild weather.Oct 30, 2019
https://www.bloomberg.com › articles
U.S. Farm Bankruptcies Surge 24% on Strain From Trump Trade War

But don't worry mother government bailed them out to the tune of billions or it would of been much much higher.
 

This was after the republican party made major deal with China to sell their products to China.


Lol republican really **** the farmers hard.

Poor farmers.

Don't worry Trump bailed out 90% of them with mother government and your tax dollar welfare.


We always have to bail out somebody with republican policies.

Bidencrimefamily » Today, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:17 pm

Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world embroiled in trade wars. Sign up here. U.S. farm bankruptcies in September surged 24% to the highest since 2011 amid strains from President Donald Trump's trade war with China and a year of wild weather.Oct 30, 2019
https://www.bloomberg.com › articles
U.S. Farm Bankruptcies Surge 24% on Strain From Trump Trade War

Did you miss the memo that there was a pandemic under Trump and consequently your party forced Trump to do an economic lockdown?

Of course you did. You always conveniently leave that part out. 

*Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Did you miss the memo that there was a pandemic under Trump and consequently your party forced Trump to do an economic lockdown?

Of course you did. You always conveniently leave that part out.

Don't worry Trump bailed them.out with billions of dollars. 

For a trade deal that list jobs at the end. 
lol
 

Bidencrimefamily » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

43 minutes ago

Don't worry Trump bailed them.out with billions of dollars. 

For a trade deal that list jobs at the end. 
lol

Actually, no. He didn't.

Sp bush makes a major deal to sell farmers products to China boosting exports of U.S. farmers goods.

Then Trump pulls the rug out from under them in his trade deals.

And they went broke.
Then Trump came to the rescue with a bail out.

Why do we always have to bail people out during or directly after republican presidents?

*Vegas » Yesterday, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:31 pm

Did you miss the memo that there was a pandemic under Trump and consequently your party forced Trump to do an economic lockdown?

Of course you did. You always conveniently leave that part out.

WTF does that have to do with his **** policy choices?

Try to fashion a coherent argument, Level 0.27 loser.
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

WTF does that have to do with his **** policy choices?

Try to fashion a coherent argument, Level 0.27 loser.

That’s 2.

*Vegas » Yesterday, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:15 pm

Actually, no. He didn't.

Direct farm aid has climbed each year of Trump’s presidency, from $11.5 billion in 2017 to more than $32 billion this year — an all-time high, with potentially far more funding still to come in 2020, amounting to about two-thirds of the cost of the entire Department of Housing and Urban Development and more than the Agriculture Department’s $24 billion discretionary budget, according to a POLITICO analysis. But lawmakers have taken a largely hands-off approach, letting the department decide who gets the money and how much.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/1 ... uts-359932

******* ****.


 

In 2018 and ’19, Trump authorized payments to U.S. farmers of $28 billion to offset their losses from Chinese trade retaliation. This year, with farmers struggling under the twin crises of the trade war and the pandemic, bailouts have soared way higher. Trump promised angry farmers another $19 billion in April and $14 billion in September—bringing his bailouts to a grand total of $61 billion. He has pledged to continue these bailouts until the trade war ends.

https://www.cfr.org/blog/92-percent-tru ... ry-farmers


Worse than Buchanan 
 

Bidencrimefamily » Yesterday, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:17 pm

Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world embroiled in trade wars. Sign up here. U.S. farm bankruptcies in September surged 24% to the highest since 2011 amid strains from President Donald Trump's trade war with China and a year of wild weather.Oct 30, 2019
https://www.bloomberg.com › articles
U.S. Farm Bankruptcies Surge 24% on Strain From Trump Trade War

OK here is a situation quiz directly relative to your thread topic. Anything expanding inside out is surround by results contracting back to the center balancing events.

So how does inside out details get above outside in results already established? kind of like how does the sun com up at dawn when the sun is below the earth in this solar system?

How is great great grandchild below the dead 1 of 16 great great grandparents lived 4 generation gaps before the great great grandchild was conceived?

your mind imagines how society should evolve beyond how genetics sustains current population, and that is simply inaccurate every day.

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Direct farm aid has climbed each year of Trump’s presidency, from $11.5 billion in 2017 to more than $32 billion this year — an all-time high, with potentially far more funding still to come in 2020, amounting to about two-thirds of the cost of the entire Department of Housing and Urban Development and more than the Agriculture Department’s $24 billion discretionary budget, according to a POLITICO analysis. But lawmakers have taken a largely hands-off approach, letting the department decide who gets the money and how much.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/1 ... uts-359932

******* ****.

Right, that money would be better spent on Democrat stalwarts.....the tranny ***, illegal aliens, green energy hoaxsters, hoards of bureaucratic parasites, and other non-productive air sucker's that apparently don't need to eat.
 

RebelGator » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Right, that money would be better spent on Democrat stalwarts.....tranny ***, illegal aliens, green energy hoaxsters, hoards of bureaucratic parasites, and other non-productive air sucker's that apparently don't need to eat.

Wanna go through some math, ****?

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Wanna go through some math, ****?

Sure, let's talk the Inflation Production Act and it's obvious results. 

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Wanna go through some math, ****?

Like 7% interest rates?
 

RebelGator » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Sure, let's talk the Inflation Production Act and it's obvious results.

You mean, like, the precipitous fall in inflation?


 

BooRadley » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Like 7% interest rates?

THAT IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE, YOU WITLESS HOLE.

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Wanna go through some math, ****?

Which algorithm you going to be discussing? 3rd party observer wants to know what direction your social corruption is leading towards.