Liberal Forum

Arizona grand jurors discussed indicting Trump, but prosecutors urged them not to
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... osecutors/


It appears that Americans don't have much trouble connecting the dots...

Here's a Georgia grand juror

Said another juror: “I tell my wife if every person in America knew every single word of information we knew, this country would not be divided as it is right now.”

https://www.ajc.com/politics/exclusive- ... R4B7UTZPE/

If you don't pump their heads full of ****, Americans can be a fairly perceptive lot..

 

PHOENIX — An Arizona grand jury that indicted 18 Donald Trump allies this spring for their role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election had expressed interest in possible charges against the former president, according to a legal motion filed this week by state prosecutors.


Ibid.



B...b...b...b...but he's not lying, he's just mistaken! - Choir of Toadies.


How **** stupid would you have to be?

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 7:36 am

Arizona grand jurors discussed indicting Trump, but prosecutors urged them not to
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... osecutors/


It appears that Americans don't have much trouble connecting the dots...

Here's a Georgia grand juror

Said another juror: “I tell my wife if every person in America knew every single word of information we knew, this country would not be divided as it is right now.”

https://www.ajc.com/politics/exclusive- ... R4B7UTZPE/

If you don't pump their heads full of ****, Americans can be a fairly perceptive lot..

 

which kind of dots? intellectual talking points from people defending their characters assumed after birth or ancestors adapting in space defending their intellectual human rights to deny what they were since conceived.

either way, humanity is intellectually designed to bring the species to extinction within itself and you are enabling it to continue.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 7:36 am

Arizona grand jurors discussed indicting Trump, but prosecutors urged them not to
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... osecutors/

It appears that Americans don't have much trouble connecting the dots...

Here's a Georgia grand juror

Said another juror: “I tell my wife if every person in America knew every single word of information we knew, this country would not be divided as it is right now.”

https://www.ajc.com/politics/exclusive- ... R4B7UTZPE/

If you don't pump their heads full of ****, Americans can be a fairly perceptive lot..

Bring it on innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his or her peers 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 7:47 am

PHOENIX — An Arizona grand jury that indicted 18 Donald Trump allies this spring for their role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election had expressed interest in possible charges against the former president, according to a legal motion filed this week by state prosecutors.

Ibid.

B...b...b...b...but he's not lying, he's just mistaken! - Choir of Toadies.

How **** stupid would you have to be?

What's really **** stupid are idiots that confuse questioning the results of an election with overturning an election.
 

RebelGator » 07 Aug 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:11 am

What's really **** stupid are idiots that confuse questioning the results of an election with overturning an election.

good point 

Buck Naked » 07 Aug 2024, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:08 am

Bring it on innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his or her peers 

What are peers? People sharing same social consensus life isn't self evident.

not a soul honoring a sole time left equally alive daily in plain sight.

Where does corruption come from and nobody is willing to correct it?

HUMANITY.

31stArrival » 07 Aug 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:18 am

What are peers? People sharing same social consensus life isn't self evident.

not a soul honoring a sole time left equally alive daily in plain sight.

Where does corruption come from and nobody is willing to correct it?

noun
plural noun: peers

1. 1. 
   a member of the nobility in Britain or Ireland, comprising the ranks of duke, marquess, earl, viscount, and baron.
   "hereditary peers could still dominate the proceedings of the House of Lords"   
   Similar:
   aristocrat
   lord
   lady
   peer of the realm
   peeress
   noble
   nobleman
   noblewoman
   titled man/woman/person
   patrician
   nob
   rah
   chinless wonder
2. 2. 
   a person of the same age, status, or ability as another specified person.
   "he has incurred much criticism from his academic peers"

 
 

RebelGator » 07 Aug 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:11 am

What's really **** stupid are idiots that confuse questioning the results of an election with overturning an election.

He got upset simply because, although I said Biden won, some of the allegations should be investigated.  

Buck Naked » 07 Aug 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:20 am

peers



 

Series parallel time occupying space since ancestrally conceived to replace the specific 30 lifetimes that were your previous 4 generation gaps lived up to your conception as part of the current whole population in the atmosphere today.

there has never been a fact in humanity this accurate accounting of life in every species native to this universal position's atmosphere.

karma bitch! just bit your reality like no other person has done since dawn of civilization started corrupting every ancestor living today.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 7:47 am

PHOENIX — An Arizona grand jury that indicted 18 Donald Trump allies this spring for their role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election had expressed interest in possible charges against the former president, according to a legal motion filed this week by state prosecutors.

Ibid.

B...b...b...b...but he's not lying, he's just mistaken! - Choir of Toadies.

How **** stupid would you have to be?

B...b...b...b...but he's not lying, he's just mistaken! - Choir of Toadies.

Actually that comment was made to mock you and your defense of Biden lies.  That is why you won't link to it.  

RebelGator » 07 Aug 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:11 am

What's really **** stupid are idiots that confuse questioning the results of an election with overturning an election.

What do you believe those Grand Juries were considering?


**** idiot.
 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:45 am

Actually that comment was made to mock you and your defense of Biden lies.  That is why you won't link to it.

Why don't YOU link to it?

 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:23 am

He got upset simply because, although I said Biden won, some of the allegations should be investigated.

You know the rule and format, Retelly.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:55 am

Why don't YOU link to it?

Again you ask me to do your work.

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:55 am

You know the rule and format, Retelly.

 

Damn, your level of dishonesty is astounding.

Tell you what, you take a stand and say you did not go after me because I said some things should have been investigated, even if it was just a quick video review, and then take a month off when I eventually find it, then I will do it.  

BuckNaked » 07 Aug 2024, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:08 am

Bring it on innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his or her peers

Read the stuff in bold again, Plug.


 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:58 am

Damn, your level of dishonesty is astounding.

Tell you what, you take a stand and say you did not go after me because I said some things should have been investigated, even if it was just a quick video review, and then take a month off when I eventually find it, then I will do it.

Frediño, please..

No drama.

Just adhere to your ruly things... 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:56 am

Again you ask me to do your work.

It's YOUR work.

You are retelling.

I'm quoting verbatim...

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:52 am

What do you believe those Grand Juries were considering?

**** idiot.

I'd have to know if they were Democrats, they might be considering if their poodle needed his anal glands squeezed..