Liberal Forum

In my middle eighties now.  I was alifelong democrat.  I voted for JFK my first time.  Everything was sort of OK for a long time.  Oh sure we had big business promoting wars so they could sell war toys and all that.  That's not really a party thing.  It happens all the time.  But something did happen to the democrat party.   When the globalists' power grew to the point where their existence was obvious the US democrats began joining with them policy wise.   This continued to the point where I no longer recognized my lifelong party.   More recently the woke phenomena came along and the gender confusion?   None of those issues whould be of concern in politics.

Lately we find people wanting special rights for groups of citizens.  The gays want mroe rights.   Gender benders what this or that.   But I say all of these people already enjoy the exact same rights that we all have, courtesy of the Constition and the Bill of Rights.   They are perfectly adequate.  No one group should have any special privilege.  

Abortion?   Abortion rights?   I, personally, am against abortion except for valid medical reasons but I am not about to try to force my views on others.    I say everyone should have freedom of choice in this very serious area of life.   The troubleis though that I do not believe our federal government should be involved.   No.   I agree with the reversal of Roe VS Wade simply because I believe the States should have the authority.

I have always been a moderate democrat.  I believe the States should have much more authority than they presently do.   The federal government should concerrn itself with our country's global, political questions and very few internal ones. 

I voted for Obama twice but since then I've seen the democrat party move further to the left than I care to go.   This time, this next election, I'm voting for Kennedy.   He is a real democrat, one who is not afraid to stand against the quest for global power that is so strong in our world today. 

I suppose I'm going to catch hell for expressing my opinion.   Oh...  one more thing.  Racism.  It does exist to an extend inside of each of us.   There are no official, national policies that are meant to be racist though.    I remember the America of the 1950s.   I was a teen then in high school.  I remember damned well what blacks had to put up with.  All of that is gone now.   Those who claim America is tainted by "institutional racism" do not know what they are talking about.   In the late 1960s all that was dealth a death blow.   Does racism exist today?  Sure but it's inside of each of us, not the government.   I'm glad it's gone but one more thing.   Reverse racism is just as bad as the original, anti minority, kind.   Those actions that harm whites now are just as bad as those older ones that harmed blacks and Jews long ago.  Again though... it iswe who harbor these kinds of things.   No legislation or orders can make them go away if we hold them close.

I myself sometimes have anti black tendencies.   When I hear an angry black using foul language (bitches. mother ****... etc) I react by wanting to be as far from that person as possible.   I will never accept that kind of crude, uncivilized speech when I have the power to avoid it.   This is the extent of my racist tendancies.   Each of us has to fight our own demons.   Life is not supposed to be easy.   If it were we would never learn anything.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

In my middle eighties now.  I was alifelong democrat.  I voted for JFK my first time.  Everything was sort of OK for a long time.  Oh sure we had big business promoting wars so they could sell war toys and all that.  That's not really a party thing.  It happens all the time.  But something did happen to the democrat party.   When the globalists' power grew to the point where their existence was obvious the US democrats began joining with them policy wise.   This continued to the point where I no longer recognized my lifelong party.   More recently the woke phenomena came along and the gender confusion?   None of those issues whould be of concern in politics.

Lately we find people wanting special rights for groups of citizens.  The gays want mroe rights.   Gender benders what this or that.   But I say all of these people already enjoy the exact same rights that we all have, courtesy of the Constition and the Bill of Rights.   They are perfectly adequate.  No one group should have any special privilege.  

Abortion?   Abortion rights?   I, personally, am against abortion except for valid medical reasons but I am not about to try to force my views on others.    I say everyone should have freedom of choice in this very serious area of life.   The troubleis though that I do not believe our federal government should be involved.   No.   I agree with the reversal of Roe VS Wade simply because I believe the States should have the authority.

I have always been a moderate democrat.  I believe the States should have much more authority than they presently do.   The federal government should concerrn itself with our country's global, political questions and very few internal ones. 

I voted for Obama twice but since then I've seen the democrat party move further to the left than I care to go.   This time, this next election, I'm voting for Kennedy.   He is a real democrat, one who is not afraid to stand against the quest for global power that is so strong in our world today. 

I suppose I'm going to catch hell for expressing my opinion.   Oh...  one more thing.  Racism.  It does exist to an extend inside of each of us.   There are no official, national policies that are meant to be racist though.    I remember the America of the 1950s.   I was a teen then in high school.  I remember damned well what blacks had to put up with.  All of that is gone now.   Those who claim America is tainted by "institutional racism" do not know what they are talking about.   In the late 1960s all that was dealth a death blow.   Does racism exist today?  Sure but it's inside of each of us, not the government.   I'm glad it's gone but one more thing.   Reverse racism is just as bad as the original, anti minority, kind.   Those actions that harm whites now are just as bad as those older ones that harmed blacks and Jews long ago.  Again though... it iswe who harbor these kinds of things.   No legislation or orders can make them go away if we hold them close.

I myself sometimes have anti black tendencies.   When I hear an angry black using foul language (bitches. mother ****... etc) I react by wanting to be as far from that person as possible.   I will never accept that kind of crude, uncivilized speech when I have the power to avoid it.   This is the extent of my racist tendancies.   Each of us has to fight our own demons.   Life is not supposed to be easy.   If it were we would never learn anything.

Great post...
 

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

In my middle eighties now.  I was alifelong democrat.  I voted for JFK my first time.  Everything was sort of OK for a long time.  Oh sure we had big business promoting wars so they could sell war toys and all that.  That's not really a party thing.  It happens all the time.  But something did happen to the democrat party.   When the globalists' power grew to the point where their existence was obvious the US democrats began joining with them policy wise.   This continued to the point where I no longer recognized my lifelong party.   More recently the woke phenomena came along and the gender confusion?   None of those issues whould be of concern in politics.

Yup. That's kinda me, as well.

But I was young and dumb on my first vote, and I voted for reagan because I bought the anti-Iran propaganda - and FDR's entire set of game rules which had created the middle class began to be destroyed.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

+
Lately we find people wanting special rights for groups of citizens.  The gays want mroe rights.   Gender benders what this or that.   But I say all of these people already enjoy the exact same rights that we all have, courtesy of the Constition and the Bill of Rights.   They are perfectly adequate.  No one group should have any special privilege.

Agreed.

Men who PURPORT to "feel" this way get to be naked with women against their will.
Men who do not are not allowed to infringe on women that way.

Disparate rights start fights, cause the knocking out of lights.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

Abortion?   Abortion rights?   I, personally, am against abortion except for valid medical reasons but I am not about to try to force my views on others.    I say everyone should have freedom of choice in this very serious area of life.   The troubleis though that I do not believe our federal government should be involved.   No.   I agree with the reversal of Roe VS Wade simply because I believe the States should have the authority.

Same same.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

I have always been a moderate democrat.  I believe the States should have much more authority than they presently do.   The federal government should concerrn itself with our country's global, political questions and very few internal ones.

50 experiments in democracy - which is TRUE diversity, as opposed to adopting a *** baby to virtue signal, or living around people that don't even like you.



Continued in next post, for space...

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

I voted for Obama twice but since then I've seen the democrat party move further to the left than I care to go.   This time, this next election, I'm voting for Kennedy.   He is a real democrat, one who is not afraid to stand against the quest for global power that is so strong in our world today.

I respect that. If he makes the ballot in my state I will join you. I want Trump to win for the big **** you to my enemy the deep state. But I believe that Jesus is watching, and I just cannot see myself casting a vote for Lonesome Rhodes' doppelganger.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

I suppose I'm going to catch hell for expressing my opinion.   Oh...  one more thing.  Racism.  It does exist to an extend inside of each of us.   There are no official, national policies that are meant to be racist though.    I remember the America of the 1950s.   I was a teen then in high school.  I remember damned well what blacks had to put up with.  All of that is gone now.

Yeah, they had to put up with our ****.

Now we gotta put up with theirs.

I prefer the old days when those watermelon dangers knew their place. So do they, by the way, if they have any sense. They had it a **** of a lot better when they were put upon. Not everyone who **** on you is your enemy, and not everyone who gets you out of **** is your friend. 

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

Those who claim America is tainted by "institutional racism" do not know what they are talking about.   In the late 1960s all that was dealt a death blow.   Does racism exist today?  Sure but it's inside of each of us, not the government.   I'm glad it's gone but one more thing.   Reverse racism is just as bad as the original, anti minority, kind.   Those actions that harm whites now are just as bad as those older ones that harmed blacks and Jews long ago.  Again though... it is we who harbor these kinds of things.   No legislation or orders can make them go away if we hold them close.

I have to agree. I am a harboring mother ****, and I can testify that I cannot even get my own FAMILY to go along, much less the city council.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

I myself sometimes have anti black tendencies.

Good on ya, mate!

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

 When I hear an angry black using foul language (bitches. mother ****... etc) I react by wanting to be as far from that person as possible.   I will never accept that kind of crude, uncivilized speech when I have the power to avoid it.   This is the extent of my racist tendancies.   Each of us has to fight our own demons.   Life is not supposed to be easy.   If it were we would never learn anything.

Do you cozy up to white folks behaving like that? If not, it isn't racist. It just feels that way because so **** many black folks are just *** - and yes, there ARE black folks and ***, and you know it. That's why keeping them down was a good thing. It kept the *** problem in check. Now, they got us down - which is a bad thing, because it takes white people's values and brains to run a first world country (that is a falsifiable fact-statement; if you don't like it, get to work falsifying it). It's so bad, they got you kicking yourself for not liking ***, and that is some pure ****. Black folks HATE ***. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

In my middle eighties now.  I was alifelong democrat.  I voted for JFK my first time.  Everything was sort of OK for a long time.  Oh sure we had big business promoting wars so they could sell war toys and all that.  That's not really a party thing.  It happens all the time.  But something did happen to the democrat party.   When the globalists' power grew to the point where their existence was obvious the US democrats began joining with them policy wise.   This continued to the point where I no longer recognized my lifelong party.   More recently the woke phenomena came along and the gender confusion?   None of those issues whould be of concern in politics.


I suppose I'm going to catch hell for expressing my opinion.   Oh...  one more thing.  Racism.  It does exist to an extend inside of each of us.   There are no official, national policies that are meant to be racist though.    I remember the America of the 1950s.   I was a teen then in high school.  I remember damned well what blacks had to put up with.  All of that is gone now.   Those who claim America is tainted by "institutional racism" do not know what they are talking about.   In the late 1960s all that was dealth a death blow.   Does racism exist today?  Sure but it's inside of each of us, not the government.   I'm glad it's gone but one more thing.   Reverse racism is just as bad as the original, anti minority, kind.   Those actions that harm whites now are just as bad as those older ones that harmed blacks and Jews long ago.  Again though... it iswe who harbor these kinds of things.   No legislation or orders can make them go away if we hold them close.

I myself sometimes have anti black tendencies.   When I hear an angry black using foul language (bitches. mother ****... etc) I react by wanting to be as far from that person as possible.   I will never accept that kind of crude, uncivilized speech when I have the power to avoid it.   This is the extent of my racist tendancies.   Each of us has to fight our own demons.   Life is not supposed to be easy.   If it were we would never learn anything.

You join a social consensus to feel like you belong to something more than life gives each ancestor their time to adapt uniquely alive daily. That is what humanity does to ancestries on purpose. Promise better tomorrows when genetics has always eternally separated every ancestor lived native to this atmosphere so far.

Ideas life is more than adapting to space since rotation conceived was this species' original sin and it is the cause of the final conflict always at odds within each sole reproduction alive today since birth as life for this species began with inception of original 16 great great grandparents adding a 2nd generation of 8 great grandparents bring about a 3rd generation of 4 grandparents delivering two parents conceiving each new great great grandchild born daily.

That system of evolving is core of every alternate reality in this atmosphere regardless race, creed, color, generation gap, ancestral lineages originated in whatever time zone or temperate zone their ancestry geographically evolved out of the past from into the precise numbers alive this rotation of the planet.

I really do empathize what you have experienced daily, as have I. But, I changed my mind in 1982. finally figured out how things got so absolutely corrupted in 2006.

Nobody listens to how actual evolving works in plain sight.

mid eighties? you are only 1/2 way. you will live to be in your 160's. modern medical, and humping 3 squaws a day will keep you fit. best advice: stop thinking!!! be aware. stop planning. go with the flow. and you will live long, with a smile on your face.

walkingstick » 12 Aug 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 8:06 am

mid eighties? you are only 1/2 way. you will live to be in your 160's. modern medical, and humping 3 squaws a day will keep you fit. best advice: stop thinking!!! be aware. stop planning. go with the flow. and you will live long, with a smile on your face.

letting you be aware. i am in my mid 90's. in your 90's things start to grow. my feet grew from 9 1/2 into size 13. my penis head now hangs below my underwear. and i am growing taller. by the time i am 130, i might take up basketball.

Varnaj42 » 11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2024, 7:25 pm

In my middle eighties now.  I was alifelong democrat.  I voted for JFK my first time.  Everything was sort of OK for a long time.  Oh sure we had big business promoting wars so they could sell war toys and all that.  That's not really a party thing.  It happens all the time.  But something did happen to the democrat party.   When the globalists' power grew to the point where their existence was obvious the US democrats began joining with them policy wise.   This continued to the point where I no longer recognized my lifelong party.   More recently the woke phenomena came along and the gender confusion?   None of those issues whould be of concern in politics.

Lately we find people wanting special rights for groups of citizens.  The gays want mroe rights.   Gender benders what this or that.   But I say all of these people already enjoy the exact same rights that we all have, courtesy of the Constition and the Bill of Rights.   They are perfectly adequate.  No one group should have any special privilege.  

Abortion?   Abortion rights?   I, personally, am against abortion except for valid medical reasons but I am not about to try to force my views on others.    I say everyone should have freedom of choice in this very serious area of life.   The troubleis though that I do not believe our federal government should be involved.   No.   I agree with the reversal of Roe VS Wade simply because I believe the States should have the authority.

I have always been a moderate democrat.  I believe the States should have much more authority than they presently do.   The federal government should concerrn itself with our country's global, political questions and very few internal ones. 

I voted for Obama twice but since then I've seen the democrat party move further to the left than I care to go.   This time, this next election, I'm voting for Kennedy.   He is a real democrat, one who is not afraid to stand against the quest for global power that is so strong in our world today. 

I suppose I'm going to catch hell for expressing my opinion.   Oh...  one more thing.  Racism.  It does exist to an extend inside of each of us.   There are no official, national policies that are meant to be racist though.    I remember the America of the 1950s.   I was a teen then in high school.  I remember damned well what blacks had to put up with.  All of that is gone now.   Those who claim America is tainted by "institutional racism" do not know what they are talking about.   In the late 1960s all that was dealth a death blow.   Does racism exist today?  Sure but it's inside of each of us, not the government.   I'm glad it's gone but one more thing.   Reverse racism is just as bad as the original, anti minority, kind.   Those actions that harm whites now are just as bad as those older ones that harmed blacks and Jews long ago.  Again though... it iswe who harbor these kinds of things.   No legislation or orders can make them go away if we hold them close.

I myself sometimes have anti black tendencies.   When I hear an angry black using foul language (bitches. mother ****... etc) I react by wanting to be as far from that person as possible.   I will never accept that kind of crude, uncivilized speech when I have the power to avoid it.   This is the extent of my racist tendancies.   Each of us has to fight our own demons.   Life is not supposed to be easy.   If it were we would never learn anything.

Do you watch a lot of FOX?

walkingstick » 12 Aug 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 8:15 am

letting you be aware. i am in my mid 90's. in your 90's things start to grow. my feet grew from 9 1/2 into size 13. my penis head now hangs below my underwear. and i am growing taller. by the time i am 130, i might take up basketball.

Body evolves as does one's brain, but the mind of a social identity never matures past the day they decided to pretend to be more than just another ancestor living eternally separated since conceived.

You only measure living cradle to grave.

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2024, 1:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 1:20 am

Do you cozy up to white folks behaving like that? If not, it isn't racist. It just feels that way because so **** many black folks are just *** - and yes, there ARE black folks and ***, and you know it. That's why keeping them down was a good thing. It kept the *** problem in check. Now, they got us down - which is a bad thing, because it takes white people's values and brains to run a first world country (that is a falsifiable fact-statement; if you don't like it, get to work falsifying it). It's so bad, they got you kicking yourself for not liking ***, and that is some pure ****. Black folks HATE ***. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4
 

No.  I do not.  My dislike is about the uncivilized, impolite, crude, foul and abusive manner of speech that some use.  In this case where it seems I take aim at black it is simply because the word "bitches" is one that I belive has been promoted by blacks, not whites and the phrase "muther ****" likewise.   In this sense it's kind of like beginning a sentence with "ain't".   In my opinion based on more than 80 years of being alive in this country, it is blacks that do this, not whites.  

But to answer your question...   No.  I don't cosy up to whites when they are likewise vulgar.   Right here on this net there are plenty of them who can't seem to say anthing unless vulgarity is included.  I know they do this by habit and not with any real forethought.   But the topic or rather the question in which the statement is connected to is the matter of behavior by blacks, not by whites.   The whole business sounds complex to me.   Fact is that we copy each other quite a lot.   In our social arena so often a popular trend will be started by blacks and picked up on by whites who then mindlessly carry it forward.  Let me say that black blood must be powerful stuff becsause according to our social rules if a person has even a small percentage of it they are called black.   Obama for instance.  He is half and half so couldn't he be called white as easily as black?  No.  According to our socila rules he is officially black and the white part doesn't count.   Strange huh?   Not logical but that's a good example of the kind of racism we have to witness.   None of it makes sense.  And then we die wondering what the hell happened.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 8:20 am

Do you watch a lot of FOX?

No.  I can't stand Hannity.   I find myself avoiding all mainstream media, right or left.  How can I be an independent thinker if I align myself with only one side of an argument?   But trying to stay in the middle is not easy because some topics are too strong, too compelling, to be ignored.   Here is an example.   On MSNBC just yesterday O'Donnel is talking about Trump's latest presser.   He says that Trump lied many tiems in his statements.   But wait..   Since when is expressing an opinion a lie?   Opinions do not have to be factually correct.  That's why they're called opinions.   A lie, on the other hand, requires intent to deceive others.  If a man knows the truth but then ignores it while trying to promote falhood then he is lying.   But if the same man truly believes something and talks about it he should not be called a liar.  The reason is becuase he blieves it and has no intention to deceive.    The average non-thinking person has a major problem with this concept but in our courts of law a person's intent is often a strong argument in a defense.   Those who do not think will scorn the use of logic.  They always do.   O'Donnel is an educated, intelligent man.  He knows full well the difference between telling a lie and expressing a heartfelt opinion.  

I prefer to listen to the average person doing a video so long as they don't use foul language which does nothing except to reveal a person's IQ and level of education. 

Cannonpointer » 12 Aug 2024, 1:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 1:20 am

I respect that. If he makes the ballot in my state I will join you. I want Trump to win for the big **** you to my enemy the deep state. But I believe that Jesus is watching, and I just cannot see myself casting a vote for Lonesome Rhodes' doppelganger.

Yeah, they had to put up with our ****.

Now we gotta put up with theirs.

I prefer the old days when those watermelon dangers knew their place. So do they, by the way, if they have any sense. They had it a **** of a lot better when they were put upon. Not everyone who **** on you is your enemy, and not everyone who gets you out of **** is your friend. 

I have to agree. I am a harboring mother ****, and I can testify that I cannot even get my own FAMILY to go along, much less the city council.

Good on ya, mate!

Do you cozy up to white folks behaving like that? If not, it isn't racist. It just feels that way because so **** many black folks are just *** - and yes, there ARE black folks and ***, and you know it. That's why keeping them down was a good thing. It kept the *** problem in check. Now, they got us down - which is a bad thing, because it takes white people's values and brains to run a first world country (that is a falsifiable fact-statement; if you don't like it, get to work falsifying it). It's so bad, they got you kicking yourself for not liking ***, and that is some pure ****. Black folks HATE ***. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4

A conservative believe that gender is a matter of anatomy.   A liberal disagrees.  To a liberal gender is a matter of decision.   This is the reason we are at such odds in the matter.

My personal view is that, yes, some of us are born in the wrong bodies and I feel sorry for them.  They hurt on the inside.  But I also believe that some of us are cheap thrill seekers, men who want to get naked with women so they can see his dick and then he gets a rush over it.  

I believe if a man is sincere in his believe that he is now a woman the first thing he should do is to submit to the affirming surgery.  If you want to be taken seriously get 'em whacked off.  Otherwise don't try to tell me you are a woman.

By the way the same goes for a woman who wants to be a man but for some reason we don't find women claiming to be men using men's locker rooms and showers.  Why not one might ask?  The reaosn is because in nature it is usually the male that is sexually aggressive, not the female.   But in all of this we find science bumping up against emotional wishful thinking.   We have to take a stand on an individual basis.

I am a moderate.  In the matter of gender bending I am strickly on the side of the conservatives.  If a person is serious then get the surgery before trying to tell me what you are.

Why is this so unreasonable?
 

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am

No.  I can't stand Hannity.   I find myself avoiding all mainstream media, right or left.  How can I be an independent thinker if I align myself with only one side of an argument?   But trying to stay in the middle is not easy because some topics are too strong, too compelling, to be ignored.   Here is an example.   On MSNBC just yesterday O'Donnel is talking about Trump's latest presser.   He says that Trump lied many tiems in his statements.   But wait..   Since when is expressing an opinion a lie?   Opinions do not have to be factually correct.  That's why they're called opinions.   A lie, on the other hand, requires intent to deceive others.  If a man knows the truth but then ignores it while trying to promote falhood then he is lying.   But if the same man truly believes something and talks about it he should not be called a liar.  The reason is becuase he blieves it and has no intention to deceive.    The average non-thinking person has a major problem with this concept but in our courts of law a person's intent is often a strong argument in a defense.   Those who do not think will scorn the use of logic.  They always do.   O'Donnel is an educated, intelligent man.  He knows full well the difference between telling a lie and expressing a heartfelt opinion.  

I prefer to listen to the average person doing a video so long as they don't use foul language which does nothing except to reveal a person's IQ and level of education. 

Ok you are in your mid 80's. You have spent 6 decades as an adult always believing life isn't self evident rather than trying to discover why it always was as mentioned in the Declaration of Independence of this country in the western continent opposite side of the eastern hemisphere.

Now, what makes a difference on a rotating planet what west and east are? How does a star center of a solar system rise at dawn? It cannot be above the revolving planet on a horizontal circumference plane. Want to reply dawn and dusk?

Ok, why doesn't west ever meet east? Because East is the direction of the planet doing two motions simultaneously different. Depending upon view point, planet is rotating counter clockwise in the same counter clockwise motion revolving around the star. Dawn is leading edge and dusk is trailing each always the same location as daylight is facing the star center and night is facing the universe beyond the solar system in this specific galaxy.

Oops, moving vs stationary event horizons that never change location become intellectual reference points to logistical time relativity within a species using it every generation evolved so far.

Gee natural eternal separation because of a balance point equal to all things present today. Nothing supernatural about occupying time specifically here as specifically added as ancestrally alive without imagining life any other way possible..

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am

No.  I can't stand Hannity.   I find myself avoiding all mainstream media, right or left.  How can I be an independent thinker if I align myself with only one side of an argument?   But trying to stay in the middle is not easy because some topics are too strong, too compelling, to be ignored.   Here is an example.   On MSNBC just yesterday O'Donnel is talking about Trump's latest presser.   He says that Trump lied many tiems in his statements.   But wait..   Since when is expressing an opinion a lie?   Opinions do not have to be factually correct.  That's why they're called opinions.   A lie, on the other hand, requires intent to deceive others.  If a man knows the truth but then ignores it while trying to promote falhood then he is lying.   But if the same man truly believes something and talks about it he should not be called a liar.  The reason is becuase he blieves it and has no intention to deceive.    The average non-thinking person has a major problem with this concept but in our courts of law a person's intent is often a strong argument in a defense.   Those who do not think will scorn the use of logic.  They always do.   O'Donnel is an educated, intelligent man.  He knows full well the difference between telling a lie and expressing a heartfelt opinion.  

I prefer to listen to the average person doing a video so long as they don't use foul language which does nothing except to reveal a person's IQ and level of education.

On MSNBC just yesterday O'Donnel is talking about Trump's latest presser.   He says that Trump lied many tiems in his statements.   But wait..   Since when is expressing an opinion a lie?   Opinions do not have to be factually correct.

Is the result of the 2020 election a "matter of opinion"?

I prefer to listen to the average person doing a video so long as they don't use foul language which does nothing except to reveal a person's IQ and level of education.

But the average person is a moron.

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:10 am

No.  I do not.  My dislike is about the uncivilized, impolite, crude, foul and abusive manner of speech that some use.  In this case where it seems I take aim at black it is simply because the word "bitches" is one that I belive has been promoted by blacks, not whites and the phrase "muther ****" likewise.   In this sense it's kind of like beginning a sentence with "ain't".   In my opinion based on more than 80 years of being alive in this country, it is blacks that do this, not whites.  

But to answer your question...   No.  I don't cosy up to whites when they are likewise vulgar.   Right here on this net there are plenty of them who can't seem to say anthing unless vulgarity is included.  I know they do this by habit and not with any real forethought.   But the topic or rather the question in which the statement is connected to is the matter of behavior by blacks, not by whites.   The whole business sounds complex to me.   Fact is that we copy each other quite a lot.   In our social arena so often a popular trend will be started by blacks and picked up on by whites who then mindlessly carry it forward.  Let me say that black blood must be powerful stuff becsause according to our social rules if a person has even a small percentage of it they are called black.   Obama for instance.  He is half and half so couldn't he be called white as easily as black?  No.  According to our socila rules he is officially black and the white part doesn't count.   Strange huh?   Not logical but that's a good example of the kind of racism we have to witness.   None of it makes sense.  And then we die wondering what the hell happened.

It makes perfect sense.

Take a vichyssoise. It's a wonderful soup - quite lovely. Now, in 30 parts vichyssoise, put one part ****.

What have you got? You've got **** soup. 

One either does, or one does not, believe in evolution. If one DOES, one cannot deny that intelligence is an inherited survival trait. The hominids that left Africa and went to Europe died en masse when winter hit. Only the genes of those who were very clever survived. Over the centuries, Europeans' brain pans got larger and their IQs expanded. SubSaharan Africans needed speed over intellect, which explains why - in spite of incredible poverty, poor training and tremendous disadvantages - subSaharan Africans dominate track and field. They are GENETICALLY SUPERIOR in that arena - as whites are in the arena of intellect and socialization, which explains why EVERY **** BODY wants to be our neighbors. 

You may BELIEVE that you can take a Kalahari bush baby, put it with a nice jewish couple on the upper east side, and a wharton school of bidness candidate will emerge from this experiment. You will be wrong. Dead wrong. Science doesn't care about your feelings.
 

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am

A conservative believe that gender is a matter of anatomy.   A liberal disagrees.  To a liberal gender is a matter of decision.   This is the reason we are at such odds in the matter.

Yeah, this is actually false. This conceit is not even ten years old. There is a difference between gaslighting and genuine principles. The tranny movement is Salem witch trial level **** - not a legitimate belief system. It's mass hysteria, top-down fed to these monkeys.

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am

My personal view is that, yes, some of us are born in the wrong bodies and I feel sorry for them.  They hurt on the inside.  But I also believe that some of us are cheap thrill seekers, men who want to get naked with women so they can see his dick and then he gets a rush over it.

"Wrong body" is a bit dramatic - but I agree that they hurt.   

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am

I believe if a man is sincere in his believe that he is now a woman the first thing he should do is to submit to the affirming surgery.  If you want to be taken seriously get 'em whacked off.  Otherwise don't try to tell me you are a woman.

An altered male is no more a woman than a dog with lopped nuts is a bitch. God/Nature makes women - surgeries don't.

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:26 am

By the way the same goes for a woman who wants to be a man but for some reason we don't find women claiming to be men using men's locker rooms and showers.  Why not one might ask?  The reaosn is because in nature it is usually the male that is sexually aggressive, not the female.   But in all of this we find science bumping up against emotional wishful thinking.   We have to take a stand on an individual basis.

I am a moderate.  In the matter of gender bending I am strickly on the side of the conservatives.  If a person is serious then get the surgery before trying to tell me what you are.

I do not cede to conservatives the liberal principle of protecting women from sex fiends. I remain a liberal and oppose men in women's showers, prisons, and sports - up to and including those who are altered.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 10:46 am

Is the result of the 2020 election a "matter of opinion"?

But the average person is a moron.

That puts you below average, Linker.

Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 10:46 am

Is the result of the 2020 election a "matter of opinion"?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 8:20 am

Do you watch a lot of FOX?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

​​​​​​​

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am

No.  I can't stand Hannity.   I find myself avoiding all mainstream media, right or left.  How can I be an independent thinker if I align myself with only one side of an argument? 

Fox and MSNBC ARE on the same side of the argument. The "arguemnt" is a puppet show, with one side slow walking and the other moving apace.

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am

But trying to stay in the middle is not easy because some topics are too strong, too compelling, to be ignored.

WHat does Fox say about trannies? THEY CALL BRUCE JENNER SHE. They arew on the same side with MSNBC - just slow walking, and pretending to oppose. Only suckers are fooled.   

Varnaj42 » 12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2024, 9:18 am

I prefer to listen to the average person doing a video so long as they don't use foul language which does nothing except to reveal a person's IQ and level of education.

It can reveal a great deal more than that.

It can reveal the intent to soundly and publicly reject political correctness.