Liberal Forum

There is nothing wrong with gay marriage. It's the degenerates I don't like. I stand with the Dems on this issue. This is where Republicans are going to fail. They might lose the election based on social, not economic or immigration, policy issues. That's too bad.

'Good luck' prying off her wedding ring, gay attorney general tells US Supreme Court at DNC (msn.com)

CHICAGO − Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel had a pointed message to any Republicans, or anyone on the U.S. Supreme Court for that matter, who might be thinking about reversing same-sex marriage protections."You can pry this wedding ring from my cold, dead, gay hand," said Nessel, ad-libbing a line to the prepared text for a short speech she gave in support of Vice President Kamala Harris' election at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
"And I'm retaining a lot of water, so good luck."Nessel's speech came shortly after a series of clips that showed Harris, the Democratic nominee for president and a former prosecutor, sharply questioning bureaucrats and then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh before the Senate Judiciary Committee as a U.S. senator from California.
Michigan's attorney general noted that, in 2011, Harris, then California's attorney general, refused to defend that state's same-sex marriage ban."She refused to argue that some families had fewer rights than other families," Nessel said. "It meant a lot. She was fighting for families like mine."
At the time, Michigan had a same-sex marriage ban as well.Nessel said she faced a similar circumstance to Harris' as attorney general when the U.S. Supreme Court, having a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision guaranteeing a right to an abortion. Michigan, at the time, had a longstanding − and long inactive − restrictive abortion law.
But Harris, who was then a senator, "had my back," Nessel said. "She reminded me, 'Protecting people's lives and defending their rights is our job." Nessel refused to enforce the 1931 law and Michigan would go on to enshrine a right to abortion in its state constitution in a referendum vote passed overwhelmingly later that year.Nessel also touted Harris' record as attorney general, noting she went after polluters, sexual abusers and transnational gangs. "But what really stands out is when she stood up and protected her constituents' freedoms.""We know when she takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, she's actually read it," said Nessel.  
 

Punch » 22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am

There is nothing wrong with gay marriage. It's the degenerates I don't like. I stand with the Dems on this issue. This is where Republicans are going to fail. They might lose the election based on social, not economic or immigration, policy issues. That's too bad.

'Good luck' prying off her wedding ring, gay attorney general tells US Supreme Court at DNC (msn.com)

CHICAGO − Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel had a pointed message to any Republicans, or anyone on the U.S. Supreme Court for that matter, who might be thinking about reversing same-sex marriage protections."You can pry this wedding ring from my cold, dead, gay hand," said Nessel, ad-libbing a line to the prepared text for a short speech she gave in support of Vice President Kamala Harris' election at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
"And I'm retaining a lot of water, so good luck."Nessel's speech came shortly after a series of clips that showed Harris, the Democratic nominee for president and a former prosecutor, sharply questioning bureaucrats and then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh before the Senate Judiciary Committee as a U.S. senator from California.
Michigan's attorney general noted that, in 2011, Harris, then California's attorney general, refused to defend that state's same-sex marriage ban."She refused to argue that some families had fewer rights than other families," Nessel said. "It meant a lot. She was fighting for families like mine."
At the time, Michigan had a same-sex marriage ban as well.Nessel said she faced a similar circumstance to Harris' as attorney general when the U.S. Supreme Court, having a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision guaranteeing a right to an abortion. Michigan, at the time, had a longstanding − and long inactive − restrictive abortion law.
But Harris, who was then a senator, "had my back," Nessel said. "She reminded me, 'Protecting people's lives and defending their rights is our job." Nessel refused to enforce the 1931 law and Michigan would go on to enshrine a right to abortion in its state constitution in a referendum vote passed overwhelmingly later that year.Nessel also touted Harris' record as attorney general, noting she went after polluters, sexual abusers and transnational gangs. "But what really stands out is when she stood up and protected her constituents' freedoms.""We know when she takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, she's actually read it," said Nessel.

 "And I'm retaining a lot of water, so good luck."

I like her.

 

Punch » 22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am

There is nothing wrong with gay marriage. It's the degenerates I don't like. I stand with the Dems on this issue. This is where Republicans are going to fail. They might lose the election based on social, not economic or immigration, policy issues. That's too bad.

'Good luck' prying off her wedding ring, gay attorney general tells US Supreme Court at DNC (msn.com)

CHICAGO − Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel had a pointed message to any Republicans, or anyone on the U.S. Supreme Court for that matter, who might be thinking about reversing same-sex marriage protections."You can pry this wedding ring from my cold, dead, gay hand," said Nessel, ad-libbing a line to the prepared text for a short speech she gave in support of Vice President Kamala Harris' election at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
"And I'm retaining a lot of water, so good luck."Nessel's speech came shortly after a series of clips that showed Harris, the Democratic nominee for president and a former prosecutor, sharply questioning bureaucrats and then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh before the Senate Judiciary Committee as a U.S. senator from California.
Michigan's attorney general noted that, in 2011, Harris, then California's attorney general, refused to defend that state's same-sex marriage ban."She refused to argue that some families had fewer rights than other families," Nessel said. "It meant a lot. She was fighting for families like mine."
At the time, Michigan had a same-sex marriage ban as well.Nessel said she faced a similar circumstance to Harris' as attorney general when the U.S. Supreme Court, having a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision guaranteeing a right to an abortion. Michigan, at the time, had a longstanding − and long inactive − restrictive abortion law.
But Harris, who was then a senator, "had my back," Nessel said. "She reminded me, 'Protecting people's lives and defending their rights is our job." Nessel refused to enforce the 1931 law and Michigan would go on to enshrine a right to abortion in its state constitution in a referendum vote passed overwhelmingly later that year.Nessel also touted Harris' record as attorney general, noting she went after polluters, sexual abusers and transnational gangs. "But what really stands out is when she stood up and protected her constituents' freedoms.""We know when she takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, she's actually read it," said Nessel.

Who the **** is talking about removing same sex marriage protection?  Harris has no issues to run on so they are making **** up?

She’s not married look at the definition of the word

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 5:16 am

Punch » 22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am

There is nothing wrong with gay marriage. It's the degenerates I don't like. I stand with the Dems on this issue. This is where Republicans are going to fail. They might lose the election based on social, not economic or immigration, policy issues. That's too bad.

'Good luck' prying off her wedding ring, gay attorney general tells US Supreme Court at DNC (msn.com)

CHICAGO − Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel had a pointed message to any Republicans, or anyone on the U.S. Supreme Court for that matter, who might be thinking about reversing same-sex marriage protections."You can pry this wedding ring from my cold, dead, gay hand," said Nessel, ad-libbing a line to the prepared text for a short speech she gave in support of Vice President Kamala Harris' election at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
"And I'm retaining a lot of water, so good luck."

Who the **** is talking about removing same sex marriage protection?  Harris has no issues to run on so they are making **** up?

 

 

Buck » wrote:

30 Jan 1970, 10:57 pm

She’s not married look at the definition of the word

 

Can't make this Stupid up.

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 5:16 am

Who the **** is talking about removing same sex marriage protection?  Harris has no issues to run on so they are making **** up?

Nobody. Lol These idiots just make **** up. 

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:14 am

 


Can't make this Stupid up.

 

Not sure what office Bick is running for.  Try again, Retard.  

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:19 am

Not sure what office Bick is running for.  Try again, Retard.

She wasn't exclusively addressing candidates for office, Controlly.

She was addressing those who refuse to accept same sex marriage.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:31 am

She wasn't exclusively addressing candidates for office, Controlly.

She was addressing those who refuse to accept same sex marriage.

That's nice.  Bit not true:

Michigan's attorney general noted that, in 2011, Harris, then California's attorney general, refused to defend that state's same-sex marriage ban."She refused to argue that some families had fewer rights than other families," Nessel said. "It meant a lot. She was fighting for families like mine."
At the time, Michigan had a same-sex marriage ban as well.Nessel said she faced a similar circumstance to Harris' as attorney general when the U.S. Supreme Court, having a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision guaranteeing a right to an abortion. Michigan, at the time, had a longstanding − and long inactive − restrictive abortion law.

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:40 am

That's nice.  Bit not true:

Michigan's attorney general noted that, in 2011, Harris, then California's attorney general, refused to defend that state's same-sex marriage ban."She refused to argue that some families had fewer rights than other families," Nessel said. "It meant a lot. She was fighting for families like mine."
At the time, Michigan had a same-sex marriage ban as well.Nessel said she faced a similar circumstance to Harris' as attorney general when the U.S. Supreme Court, having a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision guaranteeing a right to an abortion. Michigan, at the time, had a longstanding − and long inactive − restrictive abortion law.

So your argument is that she was exclusively addressing Kamala's actions in 2011?

Or was she making the point that Kamala has supported the rights of those who choose it, even when it meant standing against a state law?
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:45 am

So your argument is that she was exclusively addressing Kamala's actions in 2011?

Or was she making the point that Kamala has supported the rights of those who choose it, even when it meant standing against a state law?

Askholio, take a stand.  

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:45 am

So your argument is that she was exclusively addressing Kamala's actions in 2011?

Or was she making the point that Kamala has supported the rights of those who choose it, even when it meant standing against a state law?
 

 

CHICAGO − Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel had a pointed message to any Republicans, or anyone on the U.S. Supreme Court for that matter, who might be thinking about reversing same-sex marriage protections.

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:14 am

Can't make this Stupid up.

Can 2 lesbos or 2 queers like you CONCIEVE A CHILD???

No?? Then it's not a marriage. Since the PURPOSE of marriage is to give LEGAL STANDING to the OFFSPRING OF SUCH UNION!!

Sucks you are WAY TO **** STUPID to grasp that one simple concept of MARRIAGE!!

 

Punch » 22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 4:42 am

There is nothing wrong with gay marriage. 

Then why did the court have to shove it down America's throat?

Why did the voters of California reject it?

Why should society be required by JUDICIAL FIAT to recognize these marriages, when the People voted against it?

Your opinion is only that - an opinion. You say it like it's settled science. I can make plenty of arguments against gay marriage. 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:31 am

She wasn't exclusively addressing candidates for office, Controlly.

She was addressing those who refuse to accept same sex marriage.

Exactly,  that's why I find her a detestable and deviant pervert......not only do they want to engage in filthy behavior, they want normal people to endorse it.

Cannonpointer » 22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am

Then why did the court have to shove it down America's throat?

Why did the voters of California reject it?

Why should society be required by JUDICIAL FIAT to recognize these marriages, when the People voted against it?

Your opinion is only that - an opinion. You say it like it's settled science. I can make plenty of arguments against gay marriage.

I don't think the government should be involved, at any level with marriage/  Marriage should be a private institution.  If need be for legal purposes two people who wish to live together could enter a civil union.  If they want a ceremony they can go to the private sector. 

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 5:16 am

Who the **** is talking about removing same sex marriage protection?  Harris has no issues to run on so they are making **** up?

FEARPORN at its finest ...

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 9:56 am

I don't think the government should be involved, at any level with marriage/  Marriage should be a private institution.  If need be for legal purposes two people who wish to live together could enter a civil union.  If they want a ceremony they can go to the private sector.

I was anti-marriage, pro-civil union. Then the activist court decided for me. For all of us. 
 

Marriage is between a man and a woman

Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 8:20 am

Can 2 lesbos or 2 queers like you CONCIEVE A CHILD???

No?? Then it's not a marriage. Since the PURPOSE of marriage is to give LEGAL STANDING to the OFFSPRING OF SUCH UNION!!

Sucks you are WAY TO **** STUPID to grasp that one simple concept of MARRIAGE!!

C@Blackvegetable  , STOP RUNNING from the QUESTION and ANSWER IT like the sniveling PIECE OF **** DICKYSUCKYBOY YOU ARE!!