Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Y'all remember BRAGGING about those 34 Trump "convictions"?? Well well now!! Wave Buh BYE to them!
Y'all remember BRAGGING about those 34 Trump "convictions"?? Well well now!! Wave Buh BYE to them!
By Beekeeper
26 Aug 2024 4:19 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Aug 2024 4:19 pm
Looks like Fat Alvin IS CONCEDING that he HAS NO HOPE to win his "case" on appeal!! Seems those "felonies" are GOING AWAY and that must REALLY SUCK for you LEFT WING SCUM TURDS!!
Bragg sent a letter to Judge Merchan stating that it would be "prudent" to postpone the sentencing, likely until after the election. Bragg is apparently leaving the final decision up to the judge, but such a move could eliminate another thorn in Trump's side as he races toward the finish line.
Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg has conceded that it would be prudent for the state court to postpone the sentencing of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, which is currently scheduled to occur on September 18.
In a letter to Judge Juan Merchan, which was docketed by the court on Monday (though it is dated the prior Friday), Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
Bragg still isn't admitting that his "novel legal theories" were invalid, but he does appear to be giving a nod to a couple of glaring realities surrounding this case. Now that Trump's attorneys have officially moved to have his appeal heard at the federal level, the DA is admitting that "a small subset of the trial evidence" entered against Trump might have been "improperly admitted" if the evidence spoke to actions that would fall under the President's official duties. He further notes that a ruling denying the postponement could be "immediately appealable" at the federal level and that an adjournment could "allow for orderly appellate litigation of that question."
Bragg sent a letter to Judge Merchan stating that it would be "prudent" to postpone the sentencing, likely until after the election. Bragg is apparently leaving the final decision up to the judge, but such a move could eliminate another thorn in Trump's side as he races toward the finish line.
Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg has conceded that it would be prudent for the state court to postpone the sentencing of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, which is currently scheduled to occur on September 18.
In a letter to Judge Juan Merchan, which was docketed by the court on Monday (though it is dated the prior Friday), Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
Bragg still isn't admitting that his "novel legal theories" were invalid, but he does appear to be giving a nod to a couple of glaring realities surrounding this case. Now that Trump's attorneys have officially moved to have his appeal heard at the federal level, the DA is admitting that "a small subset of the trial evidence" entered against Trump might have been "improperly admitted" if the evidence spoke to actions that would fall under the President's official duties. He further notes that a ruling denying the postponement could be "immediately appealable" at the federal level and that an adjournment could "allow for orderly appellate litigation of that question."
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
26 Aug 2024 4:30 pm
26 Aug 2024 5:21 pm
When BRAGG concedes that his case in in TROUBLE, as the testimony of several should never have happened, it's in MASSIVE trouble.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
26 Aug 2024 5:29 pm
That isn't what he did.Beekeeper » 26 Aug 2024, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑ When BRAGG concedes that his case in in TROUBLE, as the testimony of several should never have happened, it's in MASSIVE trouble.
You're an idiot.
26 Aug 2024 6:23 pm
What did he do?
26 Aug 2024 7:52 pm
26 Aug 2024 11:46 pm
That's gonna leave a mark on beevee.Beekeeper » 26 Aug 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like Fat Alvin IS CONCEDING that he HAS NO HOPE to win his "case" on appeal!! Seems those "felonies" are GOING AWAY and that must REALLY SUCK for you LEFT WING SCUM TURDS!!
Bragg sent a letter to Judge Merchan stating that it would be "prudent" to postpone the sentencing, likely until after the election. Bragg is apparently leaving the final decision up to the judge, but such a move could eliminate another thorn in Trump's side as he races toward the finish line.
Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg has conceded that it would be prudent for the state court to postpone the sentencing of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, which is currently scheduled to occur on September 18.
In a letter to Judge Juan Merchan, which was docketed by the court on Monday (though it is dated the prior Friday), Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
Bragg still isn't admitting that his "novel legal theories" were invalid, but he does appear to be giving a nod to a couple of glaring realities surrounding this case. Now that Trump's attorneys have officially moved to have his appeal heard at the federal level, the DA is admitting that "a small subset of the trial evidence" entered against Trump might have been "improperly admitted" if the evidence spoke to actions that would fall under the President's official duties. He further notes that a ruling denying the postponement could be "immediately appealable" at the federal level and that an adjournment could "allow for orderly appellate litigation of that question."
https://i.postimg.cc/rF6VjZNN/image.png
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Aug 2024 11:46 pm
https://i.postimg.cc/rF6VjZNN/image.png
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Aug 2024 5:10 am
You should try READING PAST THE HEADLINE, DICK SUCKER!!
Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
AND THAT MEANS he knows that a FEDERAL APPEAL would result in the case being TOSSED MASSIVELY as no judge/court can determine what swayed jurors or not. AND he doesn't want that to happen since that would mean this trial would be PROVEN to be politically motivated AND that he doesn't want to lose that "convicted felon" narrative before the election as well.
Your **** handlers haven't even told you about ANY of this since the entire case is NOW falling apart and Bragg knows it. SUCKS for you, HUH, IDIOT OF THE Nth DEGREE??
!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
27 Aug 2024 5:57 am
This won't take long.Beekeeper » 27 Aug 2024, 5:10 am » wrote: ↑ You should try READING PAST THE HEADLINE, DICK SUCKER!!
Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
AND THAT MEANS he knows that a FEDERAL APPEAL would result in the case being TOSSED MASSIVELY as no judge/court can determine what swayed jurors or not. AND he doesn't want that to happen since that would mean this trial would be PROVEN to be politically motivated AND that he doesn't want to lose that "convicted felon" narrative before the election as well.
Your **** handlers haven't even told you about ANY of this since the entire case is NOW falling apart and Bragg knows it. SUCKS for you, HUH, IDIOT OF THE Nth DEGREE??
Oops!!
Post the date of the verdict.
Post the date of the SCOTUS Immunity decision.
27 Aug 2024 5:59 am
How many bags of wool do you have again? the mindset is set in history to be used anytime anyone wishes. Way to go hive mind.Beekeeper » 26 Aug 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like Fat Alvin IS CONCEDING that he HAS NO HOPE to win his "case" on appeal!! Seems those "felonies" are GOING AWAY and that must REALLY SUCK for you LEFT WING SCUM TURDS!!
Bragg sent a letter to Judge Merchan stating that it would be "prudent" to postpone the sentencing, likely until after the election. Bragg is apparently leaving the final decision up to the judge, but such a move could eliminate another thorn in Trump's side as he races toward the finish line.
Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg has conceded that it would be prudent for the state court to postpone the sentencing of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, which is currently scheduled to occur on September 18.
In a letter to Judge Juan Merchan, which was docketed by the court on Monday (though it is dated the prior Friday), Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
Bragg still isn't admitting that his "novel legal theories" were invalid, but he does appear to be giving a nod to a couple of glaring realities surrounding this case. Now that Trump's attorneys have officially moved to have his appeal heard at the federal level, the DA is admitting that "a small subset of the trial evidence" entered against Trump might have been "improperly admitted" if the evidence spoke to actions that would fall under the President's official duties. He further notes that a ruling denying the postponement could be "immediately appealable" at the federal level and that an adjournment could "allow for orderly appellate litigation of that question."
27 Aug 2024 6:08 am
Here's an idea...
I lead you to water...then you think.
Post the date of the Bragg verdict.
Post the date of the SCOTUS immunity decision.
27 Aug 2024 6:26 am
27 Aug 2024 6:32 am
Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑ This won't take long.
Post the date of the verdict.
Post the date of the SCOTUS Immunity decision.
Uh, DICKBREATH, you think that means something?? A SUPREME OURT RULING is made based on cases adjudicated PRIOR to any ruling(s) they make. So Trump's case was PRIOR to their ruling and APPLIES TO ANY CASES OF HIS THAT EITHER ARE OR HAVE BEEN TO COURT!!
YOU'RE A **** IDIOT!!
THAT CURB STOMPTING DIDN'T TAKE LONG, HUH, DICKSUCKER?
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
27 Aug 2024 6:39 am
The dates.Beekeeper » 27 Aug 2024, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ Uh, DICKBREATH, you think that means something?? A SUPREME OURT RULING is made based on cases adjudicated PRIOR to any ruling(s) they make. So Trump's case was PRIOR to their ruling and APPLIES TO ANY CASES OF HIS THAT EITHER ARE OR HAVE BEEN TO COURT!!
YOU'RE A **** IDIOT!!
THAT CURB STOMPTING DIDN'T TAKE LONG, HUH, DICKSUCKER?
Post them, **** loser.
27 Aug 2024 6:39 am
27 Aug 2024 6:40 am
Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑ This won't take long.
Post the date of the verdict.
Post the date of the SCOTUS Immunity decision.
The dates don't mean **** .....
The SCOTUS ruling is Retroactive....and covers all Presidents BEFORE and after Trump......
Bragg will have no choice but to drop the case all together and reverse the ruling or retry it ......
it isn't rocket science ....
There was impropriety by Bragg and Bragg's prosecutors ....
27 Aug 2024 6:59 am
Just post the **** dates.Majik » 27 Aug 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ Bragg acknowledged that some of the evidence introduced by his prosecutors at last spring’s trial was improperly admitted under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in United States v. Trump.
The dates don't mean **** .....
The SCOTUS ruling is Retroactive....and covers all Presidents BEFORE and after Trump......
Bragg will have no choice but to drop the case all together and reverse the ruling or retry it ......
it isn't rocket science ....
There was impropriety by Bragg and Bragg's prosecutors ....
27 Aug 2024 6:59 am
Cannonpointer » 26 Aug 2024, 11:46 pm » wrote: ↑ That's gonna leave a mark on beevee.
https://i.postimg.cc/rF6VjZNN/image.png
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
27 Aug 2024 7:02 am
why don't you...oh wait, wut?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." Who is online
In total there are 6831 users online :: 9 registered, 14 bots, and 6808 guests
Registered users: Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, Imperial Wizard, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, CriteoBot, CensysInspect, proximic, SpiderLing, ADmantX, LCC, SiteLockSpider, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7