Like when Bragg ran on a promise to "get Trump."
Did they? what seems to be going forward is parables to the same "ordinances" applied differently by 5 levels of a justice system between socially defined people have exemptions and exceptions added into the vocabulary written defending people of character, not ancestral positions equally evolving now.
Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑ This won't take long.
Post the date of the verdict.
Post the date of the SCOTUS Immunity decision.
More facts..*Huey » 27 Aug 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ That is **** weak, Beta. Just like you, weak.
You lost. Move on.
Enough already...go back to slicing onions.Cannonpointer » 27 Aug 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Like when Bragg ran on a promise to "get Trump."
That changed the rules.
Well - VIOLATED them. The conviction will not stand.
The prosecutor had a dog in the fight - not kosher, fruitcake.
do understand the relevance, Beta BV. Everyone knows that the USSC came after the trial, moron. What you are implying is not what is being said.Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ More facts..
You wouldn't understand the relevance..
You need the explicit explained...here you are interpreting "implication"..*Huey » 27 Aug 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ do understand the relevance, Beta BV. Everyone knows that the USSC came after the trial, moron. What you are implying is not what is being said.
Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ You need the explicit explained...here you are interpreting "implication"..
Don't pretend that you get into the weeds, Toady.
Alpha brain leading beta minds governing Omega people has one idea in common, ignore how evolving works in plain sight daily.*Huey » 27 Aug 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ That is **** weak, Beta. Just like you, weak.
You lost. Move on.
What lie?*Huey » 27 Aug 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ I am good, Beta BV. You test lie is exposed. Have a nice day, Low T.
"Zinger" ^Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑Enough already...go back to slicing onions.Cannonpointer » 27 Aug 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Like when Bragg ran on a promise to "get Trump."
That changed the rules.
Well - VIOLATED them. The conviction will not stand.
The prosecutor had a dog in the fight - not kosher, fruitcake.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
They should never have taken the case.
No...Bragg won convictions on every one of 34 counts.BuckNaked » 27 Aug 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ You Damm right Bragg should have never brought the case
Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ No...Bragg won convictions on every one of 34 counts.
Yep!! Because that's what a SCOTUS RULING DOES, DICK LIPS!!!
That’s what judges do they listen they make decisions
Tell us your definition of a womanBlackvegetable » 27 Aug 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ More facts..
You wouldn't understand the relevance..