Liberal Forum

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/28/trump- ... t-election



Donald Trump's campaign promises would send the national debt soaring much faster than Kamala Harris' would, per two new analyses from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Both of them increase the deficit relative to the current baseline.


What they found: Keeping Trump's campaign promises would increase the national debt by $5.8 trillion over 10 years, while Harris' would cost $1.2 trillion.

• If the policies are scored using "dynamic pricing" that reflects increased tax revenues from policies that increase economic activity, the gap shrinks a little, with Trump's promises costing $4.1 trillion to Harris' $2 trillion.

under the best of circumstances, Grifty is only twice as profligate as the Sochulis..

Fortunately numbers rarely, if ever, tell any story.

That's why there's Bold Assertion.

 

**** lying assholes

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am

That's why there's Bold Assertion. 

I can put it in bold but it feels like that would be overdoing it, everyone already knows you are a dickhead..

 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/28/trump- ... t-election

Donald Trump's campaign promises would send the national debt soaring much faster than Kamala Harris' would, per two new analyses from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Both of them increase the deficit relative to the current baseline.

What they found: Keeping Trump's campaign promises would increase the national debt by $5.8 trillion over 10 years, while Harris' would cost $1.2 trillion.

• If the policies are scored using "dynamic pricing" that reflects increased tax revenues from policies that increase economic activity, the gap shrinks a little, with Trump's promises costing $4.1 trillion to Harris' $2 trillion.

under the best of circumstances, Grifty is only twice as profligate as the Sochulis..

Fortunately numbers rarely, if ever, tell any story.

That's why there's Bold Assertion.

Debt?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_Q

 

Democrat have been in the White House 12 out of the last 16 years

Debt was about $10 trillion when Obama took over.
Now it's close to $35 trillion..

Projecting out 10 years is a fools errand.

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/28/trump- ... t-election

Donald Trump's campaign promises would send the national debt soaring much faster than Kamala Harris' would, per two new analyses from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Both of them increase the deficit relative to the current baseline.

What they found: Keeping Trump's campaign promises would increase the national debt by $5.8 trillion over 10 years, while Harris' would cost $1.2 trillion.

• If the policies are scored using "dynamic pricing" that reflects increased tax revenues from policies that increase economic activity, the gap shrinks a little, with Trump's promises costing $4.1 trillion to Harris' $2 trillion.

under the best of circumstances, Grifty is only twice as profligate as the Sochulis..

Fortunately numbers rarely, if ever, tell any story.

That's why there's Bold Assertion.

You've truly got to be the dumbest and most gullible cretin on earth to believe that ****!

The price for Kameltoe's "universal healthcare" alone, which would outlaw private health insurance would be OVER $30 TRILLION IN THE FIRST 10 YEARS ALONE, and that's before she gets to give it for free to the over 15 million illegals, if she has her way.  And that's from 2018, before Biden's inflation caused healthcare costs to skyrocket!  A 2023 estimate tops out at more than $40 trillion.
[url=http://The Cost of ‘Medicare-for-All’ By Robert Farley Posted on August 10, 2018]http://The Cost of ‘Medicare-for-All’ By Robert Farley Posted on August 10, 2018[/url]

https://healthcare.procon.org/arguments ... taxpayers/

Now, get back on that short bus and shut the **** up, moron!
 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/28/trump- ... t-election

Donald Trump's campaign promises would send the national debt soaring much faster than Kamala Harris' would, per two new analyses from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Both of them increase the deficit relative to the current baseline.

What they found: Keeping Trump's campaign promises would increase the national debt by $5.8 trillion over 10 years, while Harris' would cost $1.2 trillion.

• If the policies are scored using "dynamic pricing" that reflects increased tax revenues from policies that increase economic activity, the gap shrinks a little, with Trump's promises costing $4.1 trillion to Harris' $2 trillion.

under the best of circumstances, Grifty is only twice as profligate as the Sochulis..

Fortunately numbers rarely, if ever, tell any story.

That's why there's Bold Assertion.

No intelligent thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

TDS

Once again, my media comment has been proven. 

BooRadley » 01 Sep 2024, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 7:52 am

Democrat have been in the White House 12 out of the last 16 years

Debt was about $10 trillion when Obama took over.
Now it's close to $35 trillion..

And now you know how it got there, Recidivist Supply Side Voting Cretin.

Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 10:13 am

You've truly got to be the dumbest and most gullible cretin on earth to believe that ****!

The price for Kameltoe's "universal healthcare" alone, which would outlaw private health insurance would be OVER $30 TRILLION IN THE FIRST 10 YEARS ALONE, and that's before she gets to give it for free to the over 15 million illegals, if she has her way.  And that's from 2018, before Biden's inflation caused healthcare costs to skyrocket!  A 2023 estimate tops out at more than $40 trillion.
[url=http://The Cost of ‘Medicare-for-All’ By Robert Farley Posted on August 10, 2018]http://The Cost of ‘Medicare-for-All’ By Robert Farley Posted on August 10, 2018[/url]

https://healthcare.procon.org/arguments ... taxpayers/

Now, get back on that short bus and shut the **** up, moron!

That's 2018, moron
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:50 pm

That's 2018, moron

Yes, moron.  I pointed that out, didn't I?
And didn't I ALSO point out that the estimated cost for universal healthcare now would top out at over $40 trillion?
Even with the attached link you so often demand to be included, you're still dumb enough to respond with even more stupidity, aren't you?

So tell us, dickhead.
Are you still gullible enough and so inherently stupid to believe your own idiotic post now that Kamaltoe's policies would "only cost $1.2 trillion" as you claim?
And while you're at it, why don't you go calculate how much her idiotic plan to give $25,000 to buy a home for each of the 11 million illegals here?
Think THAT stupidity might skew those numbers you think are realistic just a bit further?

But who would expect anything intelligent coming from an idiot who believes any of the liberal lies coming from Axios?

Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:07 pm

Yes, moron.  I pointed that out, didn't I?
And didn't I ALSO point out that the estimated cost for universal healthcare now would top out at over $40 trillion?
Even with the attached link you so often demand to be included, you're still dumb enough to respond with even more stupidity, aren't you?

So tell us, dickhead.
Are you still gullible enough and so inherently stupid to believe your own idiotic post now that Kamaltoe's policies would "only cost $1.2 trillion" as you claim?
And while you're at it, why don't you go calculate how much her idiotic plan to give $25,000 to buy a home for each of the 11 million illegals here?
Think THAT stupidity might skew those numbers you think are realistic just a bit further?

But who would expect anything intelligent coming from an idiot who believes any of the liberal lies coming from Axios?

So why keep prattling?

You're a **** idiot, Zeet.

Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:07 pm

Yes, moron.  I pointed that out, didn't I?
And didn't I ALSO point out that the estimated cost for universal healthcare now would top out at over $40 trillion?
Even with the attached link you so often demand to be included, you're still dumb enough to respond with even more stupidity, aren't you?

So tell us, dickhead.
Are you still gullible enough and so inherently stupid to believe your own idiotic post now that Kamaltoe's policies would "only cost $1.2 trillion" as you claim?
And while you're at it, why don't you go calculate how much her idiotic plan to give $25,000 to buy a home for each of the 11 million illegals here?
Think THAT stupidity might skew those numbers you think are realistic just a bit further?

But who would expect anything intelligent coming from an idiot who believes any of the liberal lies coming from Axios?

He is pretty upset right now, have a massive temper tantrum from the thorough curbstopming I administered to him on another thread.  He is about to curl up in his safe space with his Binky like most Low T Beta Males do when they need a good cry.

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:08 pm

So why keep prattling?

You're a **** idiot, Zeet.

I "prattle" because you're not going to get away with posting such a blatant lie as you did without pointing out that it's complete **** and that you're nothing but a left-wing shill and an ignorant lying scumbag not to know it!

Blame your mother for breeding such an ignorant boob as you!
Including this fact I just learned about her:


     

Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:16 pm

I "prattle" because you're not going to get away with posting such a blatant lie as you did without pointing out that it's complete **** and that you're nothing but a left-wing shill and an ignorant lying scumbag not to know it!

Blame your mother for breeding such an ignorant boob as you!
Including this fact I just learned about her:


   

Zeet,

Post my "lie" in my words.
**** idiot

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:19 pm

Zeet,

Post my "lie" in my words.
**** idiot

The one where you said you were a badass, Low T.

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:19 pm

Zeet,

Post my "lie" in my words.
**** idiot

Didn't YOU post this, dickhead?

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 8:19 am
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/28/trump- ... t-election

Donald Trump's campaign promises would send the national debt soaring much faster than Kamala Harris' would, per two new analyses from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Both of them increase the deficit relative to the current baseline.

What they found: 
Keeping Trump's campaign promises would increase the national debt by $5.8 trillion over 10 years, while Harris' would cost $1.2 trillion.

Or do you see no problem and are unwilling to accept any of the blame for posting such easily provable lies as that one, asshole?
 

Zeets2 » 01 Sep 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:40 pm

Didn't YOU post this, dickhead?

Or do you see no problem and are unwilling to accept any of the blame for posting such easily provable lies as that one, asshole?

Those aren't my words.

They are Wharton's conclusions.

Wharton is a much better school than the diploma mill you attended.

Why would you presume to know better?
 

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 1:33 pm

The one where you said you were a badass, Low T.

Stalky,

You were so scairt you couldn't see any cars.

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 7:19 am

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/28/trump- ... t-election

Donald Trump's campaign promises would send the national debt soaring much faster than Kamala Harris' would, per two new analyses from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Both of them increase the deficit relative to the current baseline.

What they found: Keeping Trump's campaign promises would increase the national debt by $5.8 trillion over 10 years, while Harris' would cost $1.2 trillion.

• If the policies are scored using "dynamic pricing" that reflects increased tax revenues from policies that increase economic activity, the gap shrinks a little, with Trump's promises costing $4.1 trillion to Harris' $2 trillion.

under the best of circumstances, Grifty is only twice as profligate as the Sochulis..

Fortunately numbers rarely, if ever, tell any story.

That's why there's Bold Assertion.

You are one stupid moron......how you like that number?