Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Goldman Sachs in an analyst note this week said Trump’s economic policies – particularly on trade – would cause America’s economy to shrink. By contrast, Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic policy proposals would grow the economy, Goldman Sachs predicted.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/05/business ... index.html
I suspect that Goldman's problem is its collective numeracy.
Hold on....Et tu, JPMORGAN?
“It’s one of those magical economic proposals that can actually cause inflation and put you into a recession – at the same time,” David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, told CNN in a phone interview.
Kelly warned that tariffs are a “perfect stagflation machine,” threaten to scramble supply chains and invite a punishing response from trading partners.
“It’s a two-year-old’s mentality: You punch someone in the nose and expect them not to punch you back,” he said.
Ibid.
But what do these people know....it's not like they have the IQ of an inbred tanning bed....but surely someone who does will ofer a forcefiul and detailed rebuttal...
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Goldman Sachs in an analyst note this week said Trump’s economic policies – particularly on trade – would cause America’s economy to shrink. By contrast, Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic policy proposals would grow the economy, Goldman Sachs predicted.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/05/business ... index.html
I suspect that Goldman's problem is its collective numeracy.
Hold on....Et tu, JPMORGAN?
“It’s one of those magical economic proposals that can actually cause inflation and put you into a recession – at the same time,” David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, told CNN in a phone interview.
Kelly warned that tariffs are a “perfect stagflation machine,” threaten to scramble supply chains and invite a punishing response from trading partners.
“It’s a two-year-old’s mentality: You punch someone in the nose and expect them not to punch you back,” he said.
Ibid.
But what do these people know....it's not like they have the IQ of an inbred tanning bed....but surely someone who does will ofer a forcefiul and detailed rebuttal...
Taxing the **** out of the working class and hiring more government bureaucrats is not growing the economy, moron.Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Goldman Sachs in an analyst note this week said Trump’s economic policies – particularly on trade – would cause America’s economy to shrink. By contrast, Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic policy proposals would grow the economy, Goldman Sachs predicted.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/05/business ... index.html
I suspect that Goldman's problem is its collective numeracy.
Hold on....Et tu, JPMORGAN?
“It’s one of those magical economic proposals that can actually cause inflation and put you into a recession – at the same time,” David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, told CNN in a phone interview.
Kelly warned that tariffs are a “perfect stagflation machine,” threaten to scramble supply chains and invite a punishing response from trading partners.
“It’s a two-year-old’s mentality: You punch someone in the nose and expect them not to punch you back,” he said.
Ibid.
But what do these people know....it's not like they have the IQ of an inbred tanning bed....but surely someone who does will ofer a forcefiul and detailed rebuttal...
How do you measure a growing economy, Bugtussle?RebelGator » 05 Sep 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Taxing the **** out of the working class and hiring more government bureaucrats is not growing the economy, moron.
Expanding population trying to buy a stairway to heaven within a utopian social order becomes a dystopian global society in one species destroying itself between naturally timed apart ancestries living eternally separate in plain sight daily.
Less government, Egg Plant.
not thru illegals, ****...
and more lettuce pickers...
Answer the question then we can go over that, **** idiot.
It's very simple, dickhead!
You're a **** idiot.Zeets2 » 05 Sep 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ It's very simple, dickhead!
When there are far less than the current 72% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck as they are now.
When you stop throwing trillions of dollars at the hoax of "climate change" and stop giving hundreds of billions to fight a war in Ukraine where we have ZERO interests, and stop inviting millions of poor illegals into the country that you give hundreds of millions to in the form of free healthcare, free education, free debit cards, free smartphones, free hotel accommodations, free food, free social security, and free travel to.
When you stop killing the fossil fuel industries with new regulations by opening up more US land to drilling and fracking to reduce energy costs.
And when you have a president who will stop raising taxes and adding thousands of new regulations on the business sector that creates jobs and stop hiring thousands of new government bureaucrats to the payroll every **** month!
THEN you will truly have a GROWING ECONOMY!
You asked, dickhead!
We'll start here..Zeets2 » 05 Sep 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You asked, dickhead!
So why can't you disprove my proof of what a growing economy would look like, instead of running away like a frightened ******?
What country pumps more oil than any other at the moment?When you stop killing the fossil fuel industries with new regulations by opening up more US land to drilling and fracking to reduce energy costs.
How do you propose to pay The Wages of Supply Side Idiocy?And when you have a president who will stop raising taxes
It doesn't matter HOW MUCH oil we're currently producing, nitwit!Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ We'll start here..
What country pumps more oil than any other at the moment?
How do you propose to pay The Wages of Supply Side Idiocy?
And it's very simple how wages get paid in supply-side economics, despite the fact that libs like you simply can't understand how an economy works!Harris, during the Friday afternoon speech in North Carolina, announced her plan to impose a federal ban on so-called “price gouging,” but said “gauging” instead of “gouging.”![]()
![]()
Zeets2 » 05 Sep 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't matter HOW MUCH oil we're currently producing, nitwit!
The fact is that Biden and Harris have piled so many new fees and regulations on the industry, IT COSTS THEM FAR MORE TO PRODUCE A BARREL OF OIL THAN IT DID UNDER TRUMP! And while ignorant economists like you and Kamala think you can get away with blaming it on price "gauging" (what an idiot!)
you're both too dumb to understand that all the oil companies would do would be to raise the price of gas SO WE WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THOSE REGULATONS!
And it's very simple how wages get paid in supply-side economics, despite the fact that libs like you simply can't understand how an economy works!
Lower taxes and fewer regulations WORK to allow more businesses to start up and hire employees because they have a better chance of being successful and turning a profit when they know they can keep more of what they've earned!
THAT'S WHAT GROWS THE ECONOMY, YOU **** MORON!
Zeet,The fact is that Biden and Harris have piled so many new fees and regulations on the industry, IT COSTS THEM FAR MORE TO PRODUCE A BARREL OF OIL THAN IT DID UNDER TRUMP!
You're an imbecile.And it's very simple how wages get paid in supply-side economics
wow, another stellar refutation...you go, brown!
Post the part of Zeet's argument you found most convincing, Rog.....
No ****, it's your argument...YOU refute his answer(s) to your questions or STFU and run like you always do...**** brick...Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the part of Zeet's argument you found most convincing, Rog.....