I say **** you up your lying ***!JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Lets do this.
You can ban me and you can ban @EDC4ALL! for LIFE.
Makes no difference to me.
You yourself made the judgement call per the original challenge...
WHAT YOU SAY @EDC4ALL!![]()
Whatever he shows your dick sucking *** you will just deny it. LIke all lying leftist ***.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ "She was somewhere between 5 and 15" PROVE IT
SHOW US IN THAT EXCERPT FROM THE DIARY
SHOW US EXACTLY WHERE SHE POSTED HER AGE.
YOU CAN'T AND YOU LOST
@Cannonpointer time for a banning
You dick suckers don't accept proof.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ "She was somewhere between 5 and 15" PROVE IT
SHOW US IN THAT EXCERPT FROM THE DIARY
SHOW US EXACTLY WHERE SHE POSTED HER AGE.
YOU CAN'T AND YOU LOST
@Cannonpointer time for a banning
YOU LOST. BEND OVER.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 15 Sep 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ Statement: There is not sufficient evidence in this diary excerpt to sustain that Biden molested his daughter.
@Cannonpointer can moderate
Loser takes a 30 day ban.
If I win, I will have the title "The Giant Slayer"
https://i.postimg.cc/HxcX3Ygd/1e31d2019 ... 4446f2.jpg
**** you ya lying dick sucking son of a whore.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Yesterday, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ "She was somewhere between 5 and 15" PROVE IT
SHOW US IN THAT EXCERPT FROM THE DIARY
SHOW US EXACTLY WHERE SHE POSTED HER AGE.
YOU CAN'T AND YOU LOST
@Cannonpointer time for a banning
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 18 Sep 2024, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ "She was somewhere between 5 and 15" PROVE IT
SHOW US IN THAT EXCERPT FROM THE DIARY
SHOW US EXACTLY WHERE SHE POSTED HER AGE.
YOU CAN'T AND YOU LOST
@Cannonpointer time for a banning
EDC4ALL! » 19 Sep 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ ummm. her AGE wasn't the bet now was it? YOU said prove she was molested. I did
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 15 Sep 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ Statement: There is not sufficient evidence in this diary excerpt to sustain that Biden molested his daughter.
@Cannonpointer can moderate
Loser takes a 30 day ban.
If I win, I will have the title "The Giant Slayer"
https://i.postimg.cc/HxcX3Ygd/1e31d2019 ... 4446f2.jpg
and it's obvious she did " express discomfort" in her writings...EDC4ALL! » 18 Sep 2024, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ According to a University of Law, (and I posted a link) standing NAKED in front of a young girl (especially when she changes the time when she showers so "Daddy" doesn't pop in), and she feels uncomfortable about it makes it "MOLESTATION" according to LAW. Game, set and match pookie!
You post a bunch of drivel that nobody knows where it came from. Showering with children is considered acceptable until the child expresses discomfort. This is the PROOF you posted. She changed when she showered do pervert Joe would climb into the shower with her. She was somewhere between 5 and 15. did you even read what you posted?
Sumela » 18 Sep 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I remember my diary as a young man.
tits
******
sports
tits
******
sports
tits
******
sports
It's "was I molested."maineman » 19 Sep 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ No one has proven that she was molested by her father. Her entire diary is a rambling stream of consciousness. She asks the question, "was I molested?" Then she talks about the Woolzack's house, she talks about other friends, she talks about her cousin Caroline, THEN she mentions that she had showered with her Dad. There is no direct connection between those two circled phrases.
I know that!maineman » 19 Sep 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ No one has proven that she was molested by her father. Her entire diary is a rambling stream of consciousness. She asks the question, "was I molested?" Then she talks about the Woolzack's house, she talks about other friends, she talks about her cousin Caroline, THEN she mentions that she had showered with her Dad. There is no direct connection between those two circled phrases.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 19 Sep 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ I know that!
tell it to @EDC4ALL! and the others!
STFU MM you should worry about your skank and all the men she is sucking off
Mainer...evidently you didn't READ my links. According the LAW, just showering with her REGUARDLESS of AGE, IS molestation, and it doesn't have to include TOUCHING! She was uncomfortable, and she changed when she shower so Joe wouldn't barge in. Sheesh. More than likely she was NOT an adult, but it really doesn't matter other than joe would look even MORE creepy. Seriously, did you look at him staring at her chest when she was 5 or 6 years old? You and that idiot fool just don't want to accept the legal definition.