righteous » 19 Sep 2024, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑ PUT IN RIGHT IN YOUR FACE TO EAT, MOPBOY.![]()
LEFTISTS LOVE TO KILL AN EYEWITNESS REPORT. MAKES THEM LOOK BAD. CAN'T TAKE BLAME FOR 1/3 OF THE POPULATION INVASION BY HAITIANS.
**** CLOWN
**** you ya lying child molesting dick sucker.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ nope you lost
I am not going to argue. You are too dumb to comprehend the challenge
buh-bye
https://i.postimg.cc/fLS93jpJ/hug.jpg
THE TOWN OBJECTS TO THE INVASION, THE DRAIN ON THEIR SOCIAL SERVICES AND RESOURCES.maineman » 19 Sep 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The town overall LOVES the Haitians and their contribution to their economy, and NOBODY's eating anyone's pets, you stupid moron.
1/3 OF THE HAITIAN POPULATION ARE ALREADY ON MEDICARE/MEDICAIDmaineman » 19 Sep 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The town overall LOVES the Haitians and their contribution to their economy, and NOBODY's eating anyone's pets, you stupid moron.
maineman » 19 Sep 2024, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ no evidence of Joe sexually molesting her.
I know that really frosts your **** cookies but it really is the case. THe diary does not have ANY "proof" that Joe molested his daughter.
There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 15 Sep 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ Statement: There is not sufficient evidence in this diary excerpt to sustain that Biden molested his daughter.
@Cannonpointer can moderate
Loser takes a 30 day ban.
If I win, I will have the title "The Giant Slayer"
https://i.postimg.cc/HxcX3Ygd/1e31d2019 ... 4446f2.jpg
Yeah..people love going to the Primate Exhibit at the zoo...but not very many people want to live in it.maineman » 19 Sep 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The town overall LOVES the Haitians and their contribution to their economy, and NOBODY's eating anyone's pets, you stupid moron.
EAT **** AND DIE ASSHOLEGHETTOBLASTER » 20 Sep 2024, 2:02 am » wrote: ↑ There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"
The fact that he repeatedly showered with his daughter is all I need to know about that sorry excuse for a man.
It comes as no surprise to see a sorry excuse for a man [like you] trying to defend the honor of your fellow "sorry excuse for a man".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-b ... r-BB1mWabj
There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"
GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Sep 2024, 3:42 am » wrote: ↑ There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"
The fact that he repeatedly showered with his daughter is all I need to know about that sorry excuse for a man.
It comes as no surprise to see a sorry excuse for a man [like you] trying to defend the honor of your fellow "sorry excuse for a man".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-b ... r-BB1mWabj
Your need to be sent to a reeducation camp and gassedGHETTOBLASTER » 20 Sep 2024, 3:42 am » wrote: ↑ There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"
The fact that he repeatedly showered with his daughter is all I need to know about that sorry excuse for a man.
It comes as no surprise to see a sorry excuse for a man [like you] trying to defend the honor of your fellow "sorry excuse for a man".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-b ... r-BB1mWabj
I would have gone the knife and fork route
There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 20 Sep 2024, 3:44 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DUMBEST REPUBLICAN EVER!
Statement: There is not sufficient evidence in this diary excerpt to sustain that Biden molested his daughter.
If Pedo-Pete were a republican, his daughter would be SURROUNDED by supporters assisting in an "outcry." An outcry about childhood sexual abuse starts the clock on prosecution; it's an exception to the statute of limitations.EDC4ALL! » 19 Sep 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I was able to read most of the diary. She starts talking about her memories in second grade. She then repeats numerous vague memories. Is there an exact age when these things happened? No. It could be a range, but it's not a range from 2nd grade until her 20's. If things like that happened to you in your late teens or 20's you would have CLEAR memories. She thinks she was molested but can't remember specifics. She is talking like this is a condensed timeline that she doesn't have clear memories off. It is obvious she is referencing distant memories from her childhood. She say's showering with Dad probably wasn't appropriate. In order for it NOT to be molestation, she would have to be an adult. Joe's sniffing, pinching, and nibbling episodes always seem to be with young girls. 18 is probably too old for Joe. I tried to do some research on her early childhood, but she doesn't seem to have one according to Wiki. If he wants to believe it wasn't during her childhood (but why would he post some article of a timeline when it MIGHT be OK to shower with your DAUGHTER at a young age?), but when she was a consenting adult (I guess he feels it's morally ok to shower with your DAUGHTER at ANY age), then he is one suck ****, and since Maineman claims "He's on his side) then Maineman is as morally bankrupt as he is. Call it a draw.
The journal alone is not sufficient evidence. Her testimony would be required.GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Sep 2024, 2:02 am » wrote: ↑ There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"
The fact that he repeatedly showered with his daughter is all I need to know about that sorry excuse for a man.
It comes as no surprise to see a sorry excuse for a man [like you] trying to defend the honor of your fellow "sorry excuse for a man".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-b ... r-BB1mWabj
cooked correctly it should fall off the bone
maineman » 19 Sep 2024, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ even if he didn't touch her? How can someone be molested by someone that doesn't touch her?
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 20 Sep 2024, 3:44 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DUMBEST REPUBLICAN EVER!
Statement: There is not sufficient evidence in this diary excerpt to sustain that Biden molested his daughter.
EDC4ALL! » 20 Sep 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Dude, read the links I posted. I believe one was from Cornell Law and the other is a big victims organization. No, touching is NOT necessary to be molestation
EDC4ALL! » 20 Sep 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ He showered with a minor child. THAT is MOLESTATION according to the rule of LAW!