Why?ConsRule » 02 Oct 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure I do, and using an average annual compensation can be very misleading. A MUCH better measure is the median annual compensation.
Surely, you knew that given your Poison Ivy League education.
Your mind is always on a slanted slope of observation.Blackvegetable » 02 Oct 2024, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Why?
"Misleading" would be claiming 10k+ employees.
The median is likely to be lower, leaving you with an army of MBAs and accountants working for a fraction of their worth.
Me? I'm inclined to believe that they are less skilled.
If he were to commit seppuku, how would we even know?*Vegas » 02 Oct 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Hiding in his safe space.
This is why narcissists incessantly hide behind questions and demands.
@Deezer Shoove @Cannonpointer . So instead of violating the rules by spamming, I am going to do something else that does not violate any rule, but it is kind of dangerous to do to narcissists. There are two main things that terrify narcissists
1. Being publicly humiliated
2. Introspection.
As of now, since 2017, I have only publicly demoralized him. It has been fun. I sent him to meltdowns quite a bit. However, I stayed away from forcing him to look in the mirror. That is horrifying to those retards. When a narcissists is forced to see the person they are, they go ape ****. More ape **** than just a meltdown. They surpass the meltdown phase and into a whole different state. Either one of two things happen:
1. They will have an awakening and become better.
2. They will dive into a deep depression and possibly off themselves. This is why it's dangerous to do this.
However, since I hate narcissists, I genuinely don't give a ****. Either way, it's a win-win for the board. An awakening means he will be less of a coward and if he offs himself, then the board and society can celebrate.
Really? You don;t know why using the average can be misleading? Wow. You didn't learn anything getting that Poison Ivy League education.
In THIS instance, smoking cornhole.ConsRule » 03 Oct 2024, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑ Really? You don;t know why using the average can be misleading? Wow. You didn't learn anything getting that Poison Ivy League education.
Assume 11 employees...5 make $22,500 a year, one makes $50,000 and the other 5 make $200,000. The average compensation is $105.68k and the median compensation is $50k. Now assume the top 5 see them compensation increase 5 fold. The average compensation jumps to $459k, but the median remains $50k. Did things get better for everyone of just the "elite"?
Thus ends your lesson.
By the way...since you have offered no evidence of your assertion that 99% of Trump's employees (regardless of the number) are eligible for overtime, we know your were making **** up...AGAIN.
Don't presume, twat.Thus ends your lesson.
ConsRule » 03 Oct 2024, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑ Really? You don;t know why using the average can be misleading? Wow. You didn't learn anything getting that Poison Ivy League education.
Assume 11 employees...5 make $22,500 a year, one makes $50,000 and the other 5 make $200,000. The average compensation is $105.68k and the median compensation is $50k. Now assume the top 5 see them compensation increase 5 fold. The average compensation jumps to $459k, but the median remains $50k. Did things get better for everyone of just the "elite"?
Thus ends your lesson.
By the way...since you have offered no evidence of your assertion that 99% of Trump's employees (regardless of the number) are eligible for overtime, we know your were making **** up...AGAIN.
By the way...since you have offered no evidence of your assertion that 99% of Trump's employees (regardless of the number) are eligible for overtime, we know your were making **** up...AGAIN.
To demonstrate the truth of my assertion that you have no analytical ability whatsoever, tell me what the two numbersyour assertion that 99% of Trump's employees (regardless of the number) are eligible for overtime,
I never waste analytical ability on things asserted based on an Op-Ed.Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑
To demonstrate the truth of my assertion that you have no analytical ability whatsoever, tell me what the two numbers
Employees - 10,000+
Avg annual compensation - <$30,000
suggest to you about the composition of the roster...
Cannonpointer » 03 Oct 2024, 12:48 am » wrote: ↑ If he were to commit seppuku, how would we even know?
QED, kitten....ConsRule » 03 Oct 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ I never waste analytical ability on things asserted based on an Op-Ed.
People are entitled to their opinion...and I am entitled to ignore them if I choose.
Cannonpointer » 03 Oct 2024, 12:48 am » wrote: ↑ If he were to commit seppuku, how would we even know?
Funny thing about typecast role players staying on script, One always feels indebted to humanity and the other feels entitled to be in charge of human behavior daily.Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Are you suggesting that you are owed something?
First time.
To demonstrate the truth of my assertion that you have no analytical ability whatsoever, tell me what the two numbers
Employees - 10,000+
Avg annual compensation - <$30,000
suggest to you about the composition of the roster...
Do you see me laughing, Spike?31stArrival » 03 Oct 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Funny thing about typecast role players staying on script, One always feels indebted to humanity and the other feels entitled to be in charge of human behavior daily.
I read your condescending mind projecting your character assumed cradle to grave is superior to anyone else alive. My brain explains why I am equally alive each rotation all living things are equally sharing space now since reproduced so far.
Take another look....have you ever seen calves like these on a mortal?31stArrival » 03 Oct 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ I read your condescending mind projecting your character assumed cradle to grave is superior to anyone else alive. My brain explains why I am equally alive each rotation all living things are equally sharing space now since reproduced so far.
Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Take another look....have you ever seen calves like these on a mortal?
What's not to condescend?
You haven't either, have you...*Vegas » 03 Oct 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Two questions in one post. He can't stop his cowardice. More evidence that he can't help it.
Finally, you get it. You shouldn't ask because you know the rule. I don't appease cowards who hide behind questions.
I think you should just post your rule on questions, and gaze covetously at these calves.*Vegas » 03 Oct 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Finally, you get it. You shouldn't ask because you know the rule. I don't appease cowards who hide behind questions.
I may need to do your numbers later.