Liberal Forum

1) Complain bitterly about The Debt and "Deficets"

2) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster offering Free Lunch.

3) Behold the inevitable fiscal disaster which follows.

4) Blame the incoming Democrat

5) Mewl about The Debt and "Deficets"

6) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster

7) Repeat.

Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report, released Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/07/politics ... index.html

Why?

Because they are so **** stupid.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

1) Complain bitterly about The Debt and "Deficets"

2) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster offering Free Lunch.

3) Behold the inevitable fiscal disaster which follows.

4) Blame the incoming Democrat

5) Mewl about The Debt and "Deficets"

6) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster

7) Repeat.

Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report, released Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/07/politics ... index.html

Why?

Because they are so **** stupid.
 

 

Harris and Biden have had 4 years to implement these plans.  Just sayin'.....

Oh, it is today's Dems that are looking for a free lunch. 
 

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Harris and Biden have had 4 years to implement these plans.  Just sayin'.....

Oh, it is today's Dems that are looking for a free lunch.

Yap incoherently at the facts, Yappy
 

Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

32 minutes ago

1) Complain bitterly about The Debt and "Deficets"

2) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster offering Free Lunch.

3) Behold the inevitable fiscal disaster which follows.

4) Blame the incoming Democrat

5) Mewl about The Debt and "Deficets"

6) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster

7) Repeat.

Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report, released Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/07/politics ... index.html

Why?

Because they are so **** stupid.

"Harris' plan"....?!

That **** **** is a puppet with a wet mouth. Whose plan is it really?

DeezerShoove » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

"Harris' plan"....?!

That **** **** is a puppet with a wet mouth. Whose plan is it really?

We see the conical hat....there's no need to stand up to confess.

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Yap incoherently at the facts, Yappy
 

 

I posted facts.  She is effectively running the country now.  SHe can push to have it done NOW.  

Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

1) Complain bitterly about The Debt and "Deficets"

2) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster offering Free Lunch.

3) Behold the inevitable fiscal disaster which follows.

4) Blame the incoming Democrat

5) Mewl about The Debt and "Deficets"

6) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster

7) Repeat.

Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report, released Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/07/politics ... index.html

Why?

Because they are so **** stupid.
 

Doing the 7 sins and 7 virtues nonsense here.

"The committee notes that its estimates contain a wide range of uncertainty and include many assumptions since neither candidate has issued detailed proposals."

Garbage in = Garbage out!

*Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

I posted facts.  She is effectively running the country now.  SHe can push to have it done NOW.

Your Five&NYPost fed hallucinations aren't "facts".

The administration in place til jan - the one ranked #14 by people who don't know who Jeanine Pirro is - is tasked by the American people to do the job...there is no urgency for change as it has performed quite well.

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:52 am

1) Complain bitterly about The Debt and "Deficets"

2) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster offering Free Lunch.

3) Behold the inevitable fiscal disaster which follows.

4) Blame the incoming Democrat

5) Mewl about The Debt and "Deficets"

6) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster

7) Repeat.

Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report, released Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/07/politics ... index.html

Why?

Because they are so **** stupid.

You  are a **** easily played fool......
A non-profit group that claims to be unbiased but whose board members are all anti-Trump ......are making baseless claims a month before the election and you swallow it like an obedient dog .....
Now post the Board members ......

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:52 am

1) Complain bitterly about The Debt and "Deficets"

2) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster offering Free Lunch.

3) Behold the inevitable fiscal disaster which follows.

4) Blame the incoming Democrat

5) Mewl about The Debt and "Deficets"

6) Vote for the Supply Side Huckster

7) Repeat.

Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report, released Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/07/politics ... index.html

Why?

Because they are so **** stupid.

Hey there you Trump Deranged Dickhead...


Reality's not being nice to you is it?  I got it!...Make up a new hoax!  Go check CNNLOL SAYS and see what their "Hoax Du Jour" is?...Oh wait!....this is a CNNLOL SAYS "Hoax Du Jour"...wow...you're scraping the bottom of the barrel....no wonder your triggered


You know things a going to **** for them when reality forces them to self-trigger like that

nefarious101 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Hey there you Trump Deranged Dickhead...

Reality's not being nice to you is it?  I got it!...Make up a new hoax!  Go check CNNLOL SAYS and see what their "Hoax Du Jour" is?...Oh wait!....this is a CNNLOL SAYS "Hoax Du Jour"...wow...you're scraping the bottom of the barrel....no wonder your triggered

You know things a going to **** for them when reality forces them to self-trigger like that

Naffy,


If you can't name the people describing Reality to you, don't try to sell it to me.
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Naffy,

If you can't name the people describing Reality to you, don't try to sell it to me.

Well well Trump Deranged Dickhead...you missed part of your hoax


Post the part about hookers peeing on the bed again....I didn't see it mentioned in this hoax

Look at what people think of your installed president and candidates


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E_WeuKkJ2s

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Your Five&NYPost fed hallucinations aren't "facts".

The administration in place til jan - the one ranked #14 by people who don't know who Jeanine Pirro is - is tasked by the American people to do the job...there is no urgency for change as it has performed quite well.

 

 

The Admin was not ranked 14th.  Biden was.  And 40 whatever beat him so bad that despite the wishes of 14 million dem voters they are replacing him.  Like I said if these plans were so great they would have been implemented all ready.

If this is going to turn into you ranting and raving about FOX and the Post, have fun!!

DeezerShoove » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

"Harris' plan"....?!

That **** **** is a puppet with a wet mouth. Whose plan is it really?

That's the scary part, there doesn't seem to be a plan.. Biden has handlers but I'm not sure Kamala has any, sure, all the usual suspects are cheering for her but no one seems to be in charge, they are just along for the ride.. as I said, it doesn't make sense, something smells about the whole coup thing..

 

https://youtu.be/EiTy-_VB3ls
 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

The Admin was not ranked 14th.  Biden was.  And 40 whatever beat him so bad that despite the wishes of 14 million dem voters they are replacing him.  Like I said if these plans were so great they would have been implemented all ready.

If this is going to turn into you ranting and raving about FOX and the Post, have fun!!

The Admin was not ranked 14th. 

You're an idiot....it's not a beauty contest.

And 40 whatever beat him so bad

Biden performed poorly...the idiot next to him remained standing - thereby living up to the dismal expectation of his Cult of Toadies.

If this is going to turn into you ranting and raving about FOX and the Post, have fun!!

Nothing else informs your stupid.

nefarious101 » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Well well Trump Deranged Dickhead...you missed part of your hoax

Post the part about hookers peeing on the bed again....I didn't see it mentioned in this hoax

No, Naffy...

It's true...

 

Fuelman » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

48 minutes ago

"The committee notes that its estimates contain a wide range of uncertainty and include many assumptions since neither candidate has issued detailed proposals."

Garbage in = Garbage out!

Have you ever voted for a POTUS who bequeathed a smaller deficit to his successor than what he inherited?

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

You're an idiot....it's not a beauty contest.


Biden performed poorly...the idiot next to him remained standing - thereby living up to the dismal expectation of his Cult of Toadies.


Nothing else informs your stupid.

 

Biden performed poorly...the idiot next to him remained standing - thereby living up to the dismal expectation of his Cult of Toadies.

Wow!  Even CNN said he should go.  Remember, for a couple of weeks I posted exclusively from CNN and other left wing sources concerning his beat down.  So I guess you are saying one of your primary sources was lying.