Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’
By Vegas
7 Oct 2024 9:57 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
7 Oct 2024 9:57 am
This is now the second union that told Harris to pound sand. Harris, who supposedly is the queen advocate for the hard working middle class American, isn't ringing well to the blue collar workers. They don't believe her nor do they trust her.
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’ (msn.com)
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’ (msn.com)
In another blow to Vice President Kamala Harris, the International Association of Fire Fighters announced Thursday that it would not be making a 2024 presidential endorsement. The union, which represents more than 300,000 career firefighters and emergency responders, was the first to endorse President Biden’s 2020 White House bid and has a long history of backing Democratic presidential candidates. IAFF’s decision not to endorse a candidate in the 2024 race comes two weeks after the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which has also long backed Democrats, defied the will of its pro-Trump membership and declined to make a presidential endorsement.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 10:01 am
If Kamala wins, we are a banana republic. It will be a total fix and time to invoke the 2nd amendment. It was written just for this. So scumbags cannot take over the country. LIVE FREE OR DIE.
7 Oct 2024 10:24 am
two weeks after the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which has also long backed Democrats, defied the will of its pro-Trump membership and declined to make a presidential endorsement.Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ This is now the second union that told Harris to pound sand. Harris, who supposedly is the queen advocate for the hard working middle class American, isn't ringing well to the blue collar workers. They don't believe her nor do they trust her.
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’ (msn.com)
Is the opposite true?
7 Oct 2024 10:25 am
So you didn't read the op. Believe me when I say that nobody is surprised that you didn't read a post before you answered to it.Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ two weeks after the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which has also long backed Democrats, defied the will of its pro-Trump membership and declined to make a presidential endorsement.
Is the opposite true?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 10:27 am
I quoted directly from your source.Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ So you didn't read the op. Believe me when I say that nobody is surprised that you didn't read a post before you answered to it.
You should read it.
How **** stupid are you?
7 Oct 2024 10:30 am
Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ I quoted directly from your source.
You should read it.
How **** stupid are you?
Did you read the whole article?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 10:33 am
We know you didn't.
Stop hiding behind questions.....
Is the opposite true?
If not, then you have debunked our media comment.......again.
7 Oct 2024 10:37 am
What is true is that they told Harris to pound sand. They won't be making a 2024 presidential endorsement, though they supported Biden in 2020.Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ We know you didn't.
Stop hiding behind questions.....
Is the opposite true?
If not, then you have debunked our media comment.......again.
If you had bothered reading it, then you wouldn't need to hide behind your stupid question.
1. You will ask the same question after I answered it right there in the bolded ^^^
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 10:41 am
Stupid,Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ What is true is that they told Harris to pound sand. They won't be making a 2024 presidential endorsement, though they supported Biden in 2020.
If you had bothered reading it, then you wouldn't need to hide behind your stupid question.
1. You will ask the same question after I answered it right there in the bolded ^^^
In reference to the excerpt from the citation you failed to read.
7 Oct 2024 10:44 am
Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Stupid,
In reference to the excerpt from the citation you failed to read.
So you admit that you **** up. It's about time.
Illiterate *******.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 10:50 am
No...You didn't read your citation......because you are a moron.Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ So you admit that you **** up. It's about time.
Illiterate *******.
I did.
Now is the opposite of what it reported true?
For reference, here is your repeatedly debunked Media comment
Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.
7 Oct 2024 10:53 am
Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ No...You didn't read your citation......because you are a moron.
I did.
Now is the opposite of what it reported true?
For reference, here is your repeatedly debunked Media comment
Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.
BV is just a **** retarded liberal shill
7 Oct 2024 10:56 am
7 Oct 2024 10:57 am
7 Oct 2024 11:06 am
Idiot. You may have read it, but you obviously didn't comprehend it.Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ No...You didn't read your citation......because you are a moron.
I did.
Now is the opposite of what it reported true?
For reference, here is your repeatedly debunked Media comment
Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.
I would ask you what you interpreted, but we both know how you are with questions, so I won't even bother.
My media comment has again been proved, per your own admission.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 11:18 am
Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ Idiot. You may have read it, but you obviously didn't comprehend it.
I would ask you what you interpreted, but we both know how you are with questions, so I won't even bother.
My media comment has again been proved, per your own admission.
I would ask you what you interpreted, but we both know how you are with questions
Yea....Go ahead.....
Nothing has ever been so thoroughly debunked as your media comment.....as per your concessions...My media comment has again been proved, per your own admission.
7 Oct 2024 11:19 am
I don't ask you questions, because you evade. I won't chase you around simply because you are a coward.Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Yea....Go ahead.....
Nothing has ever been so thoroughly debunked as your media comment.....as per your concessions...
Nothing has been so thoroughly proven as my media comment...as per your admission.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Oct 2024 11:23 am
Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ So you didn't read the op. Believe me when I say that nobody is surprised that you didn't read a post before you answered to it.
His question is absolutely on point. The OP says Teamster leadership defied the will of their pro-Trump "membership" by not endorsing him. There is no proof that a MAJORITY of teamsters support Trump. Therefore, the Teamster leadership most definitely defied the will of their pro-Harris membership by not endorsing her.
Obviously, her read it, and, if you did, your reading comprehension sucks balls.
7 Oct 2024 11:24 am
Let's see you prove it then...Vegas » 07 Oct 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ I don't ask you questions, because you evade. I won't chase you around simply because you are a coward.
Nothing has been so thoroughly proven as my media comment...as per your admission.
Is the NYPost lying?
7 Oct 2024 11:29 am
Blackvegetable » 07 Oct 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ Let's see you prove it then...
Is the NYPost lying?
You didn't answer my question, yet here you are demanding answers to yours.
This is why you do that
Narcissists and manipulators refuse to answer questions while insisting others do for the following reasons:
- Control: They maintain dominance by directing the conversation without reciprocating.
- Avoid accountability: Refusing to answer avoids admitting fault or revealing vulnerabilities.
- Deflection: They shift focus onto others, avoiding scrutiny of their own behavior.
- Manipulation: By demanding answers, they put others on the defensive, while withholding their own to keep power.
- Superiority: They believe they are above being questioned but expect others to justify themselves.
- Ego protection: Avoiding answers helps protect their fragile self-image from criticism or challenge.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 3353 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 3327 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Buck Naked, ROG62, Beekeeper, jerra b, jefftec, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, ….., Huey
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, SpiderLing, NING, DuckDuckGo, CriteoBot, proximic, curl/7, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, bingbot