Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’
By Vegas
Yesterday 9:57 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 11:31 am
We're only here because you evaded my question while demonstrating that you hadn't read your own citation.Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You didn't answer my question, yet here you are demanding answers to yours.
This is why you do that
Because you're a **** idiot.
Yesterday 11:32 am
maineman » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ His question is absolutely on point. The OP says Teamster leadership defied the will of their pro-Trump "membership" by not endorsing him. There is no proof that a MAJORITY of teamsters support Trump. Therefore, the Teamster leadership most definitely defied the will of their pro-Harris membership by not endorsing her.
Obviously, her read it, and, if you did, your reading comprehension sucks balls.
Show me anywhere in my title or in my post where I said they were going to endorse Trump? I said they told Harris to pound sand, though they endorsed her in 2020.
This is what happens when you retards have such TDS. You bring him into everything.
Go on. Show me where I gave a **** about them not supporting Trump. The OP is about them not endorsing Harris, though they did in 2020.
Illiterate retards.
@Blackvegetable
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:33 am
Nope. I addressed your citation. In fact, I even put in bold.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ We're only here because you evaded my question while demonstrating that you hadn't read your own citation.
Because you're a **** idiot.
But just like I predicted, you would ask the same question though I bolded the answer.
100% accuracy.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:34 am
Your dick licking of israel has made it so.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 11:36 am
Prove it.Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nope. I addressed your citation. In fact, I even put in bold.
But just like I predicted, you would ask the same question though I bolded the answer.
100% accuracy.
Yesterday 11:38 am
I prove it, then you take off a month.
Deal?
Btw...all you need to do is scroll back. Your job.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:40 am
And if you don't?Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I prove it, then you take off a month.
Deal?
Btw...all you need to do is scroll back. Your job.
Yesterday 11:45 am
Then I watch you take off a month.
Cannon judges.
No more hiding. I need to do your numbers again. Your cowardice is getting out of control.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:52 am
I have a better idea. @maineman is also reframing the OP because of his TDS. You do it because you are a coward and have TDS. However, maineman is just bringing in his TDS.
Let's do this. I will make a deal to both of you.
If either of you can prove that I said they were going to endorse Trump instead of Harris, then I will take off a month. If you can't, then you both take off a month.
Deal?
Cannon judges.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:52 am
You're a moron.Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Then I watch you take off a month.
Cannon judges.
No more hiding. I need to do your numbers again. Your cowardice is getting out of control.
Yesterday 11:54 am
If true, then you lost to one.
More redundancy. Should I tell you why you do that?
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:58 am
Hiding.Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If true, then you lost to one.
More redundancy. Should I tell you why you do that?
Kill yourself.
Yesterday 12:00 pm
So you and Maineman both are going to run and hide.
Just what I thought.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:07 pm
Damn, you're **** in the head when it comes to TDS gyrations.......and there is proof the membership is majority Trump.maineman » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ His question is absolutely on point. The OP says Teamster leadership defied the will of their pro-Trump "membership" by not endorsing him. There is no proof that a MAJORITY of teamsters support Trump. Therefore, the Teamster leadership most definitely defied the will of their pro-Harris membership by not endorsing her.
Obviously, her read it, and, if you did, your reading comprehension sucks balls.
Yesterday 12:09 pm
After you kill yourself I'll explain.Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So you and Maineman both are going to run and hide.
Just what I thought.
Yesterday 12:11 pm
Hiding. Just what I thought.
More cowardice. Given that you can't make any concrete decisions on your own, then it is safe to say that you are waiting for Mainman's decision.
You do this with CNN also. You wait for what they have to say before you go out vomit it all out.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:21 pm
RebelGator » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Damn, you're **** in the head when it comes to TDS gyrations.......and there is proof the membership is majority Trump.
proof? Sure there is... the point was YOUR OP didn't say a majority of members. Illiterate ****.
Yesterday 12:26 pm
I don't have an OP...maineman » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ proof? Sure there is... the point was YOUR OP didn't say a majority of members. Illiterate ****.
jackass.
Yesterday 12:27 pm
Vegas » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I have a better idea. @maineman is also reframing the OP because of his TDS. You do it because you are a coward and have TDS. However, maineman is just bringing in his TDS.
Let's do this. I will make a deal to both of you.
If either of you can prove that I said they were going to endorse Trump instead of Harris, then I will take off a month. If you can't, then you both take off a month.
Deal?
Cannon judges.
No one said you said that.
Here is what your OP said:
" IAFF’s decision not to endorse a candidate in the 2024 race comes two weeks after the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which has also long backed Democrats, defied the will of its pro-Trump membership and declined to make a presidential endorsement."
That sentence - de facto - means that they also defied the will of their pro-Harris membership as well.
English is such a cool language when you're not a moron like you!
Yesterday 12:28 pm
I misspoke. THE OP, not your OP.
Please forgive me, Cletis!
Who is online
In total there are 931 users online :: 14 registered, 19 bots, and 898 guests
Registered users: sooted up Cyndi, RebelGator, LowIQTrash, Jantje_Smit, Buck Naked, nefarious101, murdock, JohnEdgarSlowHorses, ROG62, FJB, 31st Arrival, BooRadley, Blackvegetable, *Beekeeper
Bots: DuckDuckBot, okhttp, Applebot, LCC, GrapeshotCrawler, ADmantX, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Yahoo! Slurp, proximic, Not, facebookexternalhit, semantic-visions.com, Mediapartners-Google, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, bingbot, curl/7