Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2024, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I particularly enjoyed this part. A guy making claims that are easily proved false about a plan he clearly never read, insisting that someone making no claims whatsoever shut up about it.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Like old Chunk always said, NHB brings out the true character of a fella. I'm an intellectual bully and a profane son of a bitch.
You're just a bitch.![]()
"Wolf tickets"?
Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2024, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I particularly enjoyed this part. A guy making claims that are easily proved false about a plan he clearly never read, insisting that someone making no claims whatsoever shut up about it.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Like old Chunk always said, NHB brings out the true character of a fella. I'm an intellectual bully and a profane son of a bitch.
You're just a bitch.![]()
And you have a skill of zeroing in on
This sounds like a refutation of your scandalous vaccine fascism to me.maineman » 07 Oct 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary
should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con-
science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology.
Do you disagree with this? I don't - and I am pro-choice down the line.maineman » 07 Oct 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity
and worth,and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development,
race, or abilities.
This^ is CURRENT FEDERAL LAW. If instituted, not a word of this would change a thing the federal government does. It is purely rhetorical. in fact, there IS no "if." It IS instituted. It is current law, signed by WILLIAM JEFFERSON MILHOUSE CLINTON. Google, "Hyde Amendment."maineman » 07 Oct 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities
are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural
death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care.
What word of thismaineman » 07 Oct 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov-
ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program
beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect
Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the
letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws.
Explain to the board what part of this hasty, ill-chosen copy paste you disagree with - please.maineman » 07 Oct 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity
politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and
bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive
dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as
well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary
must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that
HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education,
and care of their children.
Thank you.Sumela » 07 Oct 2024, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ And you have a skill of zeroing in on
on both sides equally. Bravo
Two parts of the same juicy fart.Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2024, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you.
Each side thinks I am on the other side.
And they're both right. They just live in a dimension that cannot apprehend the other side.
Or that they are, themselves, but a single side: two aspects of the same juicy fart.
it's the crack...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom