Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Everyone say goodbye to BV for a month...again
Everyone say goodbye to BV for a month...again
By Vegas
Yesterday 10:53 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 10:53 am
He is about to lose another bet to me.
It is a lot to read through, so I will just sum it up. This is where the whole dialogue takes place if you wish to go through it: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=520
If Cannon is ok with modding this, then say good bye to BV. It won't be hard to prove the impossibility of this.
It is a lot to read through, so I will just sum it up. This is where the whole dialogue takes place if you wish to go through it: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=520
If Cannon is ok with modding this, then say good bye to BV. It won't be hard to prove the impossibility of this.
He posted that I should kill myself repeatedly.
I said that is not possible.
He said prove it
I said sure, but if I do then he takes off a month.
He agreed.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&p=2633944#p2633944
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 11:03 am
When are you going to start killing yourself?Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He is about to lose another bet to me.
It is a lot to read through, so I will just sum it up. This is where the whole dialogue takes place if you wish to go through it: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=520
If Cannon is ok with modding this, then say good bye to BV. It won't be hard to prove the impossibility of this.
Yesterday 11:04 am
Putin killed Hilly ****
in 2016
Yesterday 11:05 am
Yesterday 11:05 am
Yesterday 11:14 am
Ok, @Cannonpointer ...
Here are the rules
The proof cannot be deductive - "All men are mortal, I am a homo...."
The only acceptable evidence is a death certificate issued by a medical examiner in Vegas' name. The remains must be positively identified.
To eliminate the possibility of a statistical fluke, the required sample size is 3.
If, after a decent interval, Vegas produces the abovementioned evidence, I will accept his objection as being valid and take a month off.
If Vegas fails to deliver all 3, he must leave for a month.
Here are the rules
The proof cannot be deductive - "All men are mortal, I am a homo...."
The only acceptable evidence is a death certificate issued by a medical examiner in Vegas' name. The remains must be positively identified.
To eliminate the possibility of a statistical fluke, the required sample size is 3.
If, after a decent interval, Vegas produces the abovementioned evidence, I will accept his objection as being valid and take a month off.
If Vegas fails to deliver all 3, he must leave for a month.
Yesterday 11:15 am
wtf are you tawkin 'bout?Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ok, @Cannonpointer ...
Here are the rules
The proof cannot be deductive - "All men are mortal, I am a homo...."
The only acceptable evidence is a death certificate issued by a medical examiner in Vegas' name. The remains must be positively identified.
To eliminate the possibility of a statistical fluke, the required sample size is 3.
If, after a decent interval, Vegas produces the abovementioned evidence, I will accept his objection as being valid and take a month off.
If Vegas fails to deliver all 3, he must leave for a month.
Yesterday 11:28 am
Yesterday 11:28 am
Yesterday 11:48 am
Not that there's anything wrong with that.Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ok, @Cannonpointer ...
Here are the rules
The proof cannot be deductive - "All men are mortal, I am a homo...."
Is that his claim?Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The only acceptable evidence is a death certificate issued by a medical examiner in Vegas' name. The remains must be positively identified.
To eliminate the possibility of a statistical fluke, the required sample size is 3.
If, after a decent interval, Vegas produces the abovementioned evidence, I will accept his objection as being valid and take a month off.
If Vegas fails to deliver all 3, he must leave for a month.
That he CAN kill himself repeatedly?
I took it he was making the opposite claim - that you were challenging him to murder himself repeatedly, and he was saying that's impossible.
@Vegas
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 11:51 am
It's the latter...I want it proven, in the particular.Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Is that his claim?
That he CAN kill himself repeatedly?
I took it he was making the opposite claim - that you were challenging him to murder himself repeatedly, and he was saying that's impossible.
@Vegas
Yesterday 11:54 am
Yesterday 11:58 am
I'm not following.
You agree that his claim is he CANNOT kill himself repeatedly? And you want him to prove the negative? And he claims he is able to do so?
Is that the issue, in a nutshell?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 12:00 pm
Cannonpointer » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Is that his claim?
That he CAN kill himself repeatedly?
I took it he was making the opposite claim - that you were challenging him to murder himself repeatedly, and he was saying that's impossible.
@Vegas
His claim was that I should kill myself repeatedly. I posted his words. He is now trying to slither out of it.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:02 pm
No...I insist that he prove that he cannot....Cannonpointer » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I'm not following.
You agree that his claim is he CANNOT kill himself repeatedly? And you want him to prove the negative? And he claims he is able to do so?
Is that the issue, in a nutshell?
Yesterday 12:04 pm
Post number 516 and 517 here: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=500
He made it very clear what he was agreeing to.
@Cannonpointer @Blackvegetable
He made it very clear what he was agreeing to.
@Cannonpointer @Blackvegetable
Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
6 minutes ago
To be clear, you want me to prove that this post of yours is impossible to do in real life. Before we go on, this is what you are backing up as a sound statement with no flaws. Yes?
BlackVegtable
Yes...I want you to prove it.....
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:06 pm
Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ok, @Cannonpointer ...
Here are the rules
The proof cannot be deductive - "All men are mortal, I am a homo...."
The only acceptable evidence is a death certificate issued by a medical examiner in Vegas' name. The remains must be positively identified.
To eliminate the possibility of a statistical fluke, the required sample size is 3.
If, after a decent interval, Vegas produces the abovementioned evidence, I will accept his objection as being valid and take a month off.
If Vegas fails to deliver all 3, he must leave for a month.
Nope. Not what you agreed to. I posted what you agreed to. Too late to back peddle now. You agreed, not my problem.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:07 pm
I already made it clear. Now that you know that you **** up, here you are trying to weasel out of it.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:10 pm
No...I have listed your requirements.Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nope. Not what you agreed to. I posted what you agreed to. Too late to back peddle now. You agreed, not my problem.
Stop evading.
Yesterday 12:11 pm
I didn't require anything except that you take off a month after I show the flaw in your post.
Now STFU.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Who is online
In total there are 965 users online :: 8 registered, 14 bots, and 943 guests
Registered users: JohnEdgarSlowHorses, Blackvegetable, maineman, walkingstick, murdock, Deezer Shoove, BooRadley, nefarious101
Bots: Not, CriteoBot, app.hypefactors.com, GrapeshotCrawler, ADmantX, Applebot, semantic-visions.com, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, Googlebot, bingbot