Liberal Forum

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

     I already made it clear. Now that you know that you **** up, here you are trying to weasel out of it.

I've told you what constitutes acceptable evidence to the contrary.

All @Cannonpointer  has to do is count the death certificates...when the count reaches 3, he can shut my account for a month.
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I've told you what constitutes acceptable evidence to the contrary.

All @Cannonpointer  has to do is count the death certificates...when the count reaches 3, he can shut my account for a month.

  You **** moron.   

Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

  You **** moron.

I'm not gonna take a chronic liar's word for it.

Duh.

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

No...I insist that he prove that he cannot....

Okay, that is how I read it. @Vegas  claims he can prove the negative.

Both sides agree on this?

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I've told you what constitutes acceptable evidence to the contrary.

All @Cannonpointer  has to do is count the death certificates...when the count reaches 3, he can shut my account for a month.

That is the opposite of his claim. He is clearly claiming that he CANNOT kill himself repeatedly - and that he can prove it. 
 

Cannonpointer » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

That is the opposite of his claim. He is clearly claiming that he CANNOT kill himself repeatedly - and that he can prove it.

Then let him do so...

Under the conditions listed.





 

Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Okay, that is how I read it. @Vegas  claims he can prove the negative.

Both sides agree on this?

He insists if he kills himself, he can't get back to me.

I'm not taking his word for it...he's a chronic liar.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

He insists if he kills himself, he can't get back to me.

I'm not taking his word for it...he's a chronic liar.

I would insist on proof of that claim, myself. 

He kills himself and gets back to you, I'LL take a month off.

After I suspend you for two months and him for three months.   
 

Ok @Cannonpointer  , he is going to never shut up. You know how he is after he gets owned. So, I am just going to do it now. 

He knew exactly what he was agreeing to. I will repost it now: Post number 516 and 517 here: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=500

Oh, one more thing, not that it should be a problem, but you know how sleazy and dishonest Veghead is. Therefore, he may find a way to focus on one word and to dishonestly  twist it his way. Notice that I never said that if I cannot prove it, then I take off a month. He agreed to just him only. 

@Blackvegetable  Bye. 

Proof. 

Since death is a permanent, irreversible state. Once someone dies, their life ends, and with it, their ability to perform any action, including self-harm.Argument: It is impossible to kill oneself more than once.

• Premise 1: Death is a permanent, irreversible state.
• Premise 2: Once a person dies, their life ends, and with it, their ability to perform any action, including self-harm.
• Premise 3: Assume I successfully kill myself. By definition, I have entered a state of death, which is permanent and irreversible.
• Premise 4: In this state of death, I no longer have the ability to perform any further actions, including the action of killing myself again.
• Premise 5: Now, assume I attempt to kill myself a second time.
• Premise 6: However, given that I am already dead and in an irreversible state, I would lack the ability to commit any further act of suicide.
• Premise 7: This leads to a contradiction: I cannot both be in a permanent state of death (where action is impossible) and still perform the action of killing myself again

Conclusion: Therefore, it is logically impossible to kill oneself more than once, let alone repeatedly.
QED

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Then let him do so...

Under the conditions listed.

Wait.

What conditions are those? 

I'm not poring over this like a scotus judge. I may lack integrity, but not at THAT level. 
 

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Ok @Cannonpointer  , he is going to never shut up. You know how he is after he gets owned. So, I am just going to do it now. 

He knew exactly what he was agreeing to. I will repost it now: Post number 516 and 517 here: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=500

Oh, one more thing, not that it should be a problem, but you know how sleazy and dishonest Veghead is. Therefore, he may find a way to focus on one word and to dishonestly  twist it his way. Notice that I never said that if I cannot prove it, then I take off a month. He agreed to just him only. 

@Blackvegetable  Bye. 

Proof. 

Since death is a permanent, irreversible state. Once someone dies, their life ends, and with it, their ability to perform any action, including self-harm.Argument: It is impossible to kill oneself more than once.

• Premise 1: Death is a permanent, irreversible state.
• Premise 2: Once a person dies, their life ends, and with it, their ability to perform any action, including self-harm.
• Premise 3: Assume I successfully kill myself. By definition, I have entered a state of death, which is permanent and irreversible.
• Premise 4: In this state of death, I no longer have the ability to perform any further actions, including the action of killing myself again.
• Premise 5: Now, assume I attempt to kill myself a second time.
• Premise 6: However, given that I am already dead and in an irreversible state, I would lack the ability to commit any further act of suicide.
• Premise 7: This leads to a contradiction: I cannot both be in a permanent state of death (where action is impossible) and still perform the action of killing myself again

Conclusion: Therefore, it is logically impossible to kill oneself more than once, let alone repeatedly.
QED

Implicitly, what you are asking is for me to admit I lied about the many deaths my beloved father suffered.

If I ****-can his account, I am confessing to perjury. You have any idea how many insurance companies are miffed and peeved at me for collecting on my father's deaths?

I might as well just march myself down to the county jail in women's panties again, and demand a cell. Not after last time, my friend. Not after last time. I am DONE with incarceration. 

CASE DISMISSED!
 

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Ok @Cannonpointer  , he is going to never shut up. You know how he is after he gets owned. So, I am just going to do it now. 

He knew exactly what he was agreeing to. I will repost it now: Post number 516 and 517 here: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=88826&start=500

Oh, one more thing, not that it should be a problem, but you know how sleazy and dishonest Veghead is. Therefore, he may find a way to focus on one word and to dishonestly  twist it his way. Notice that I never said that if I cannot prove it, then I take off a month. He agreed to just him only. 

@Blackvegetable  Bye. 

Proof. 

Since death is a permanent, irreversible state. Once someone dies, their life ends, and with it, their ability to perform any action, including self-harm.Argument: It is impossible to kill oneself more than once.

• Premise 1: Death is a permanent, irreversible state.
• Premise 2: Once a person dies, their life ends, and with it, their ability to perform any action, including self-harm.
• Premise 3: Assume I successfully kill myself. By definition, I have entered a state of death, which is permanent and irreversible.
• Premise 4: In this state of death, I no longer have the ability to perform any further actions, including the action of killing myself again.
• Premise 5: Now, assume I attempt to kill myself a second time.
• Premise 6: However, given that I am already dead and in an irreversible state, I would lack the ability to commit any further act of suicide.
• Premise 7: This leads to a contradiction: I cannot both be in a permanent state of death (where action is impossible) and still perform the action of killing myself again

Conclusion: Therefore, it is logically impossible to kill oneself more than once, let alone repeatedly.
QED

No...that is GENERALLY true...but I want to see it proven in the PARTICULAR.

I want clear and convincing evidence that this rule applies to you....since we know so many don't.

Cannonpointer » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Implicitly, what you are asking is for me to admit I lied about the many deaths my beloved father suffered.

If I ****-can his account, I am confessing to perjury. You have any idea how many insurance companies are miffed and peeved at me for collecting on my father's deaths?

I might as well just march myself down to the county jail in women's panties again, and demand a cell. Not after last time, my friend. Not after last time. I am DONE with incarceration. 

CASE DISMISSED!

Then Vegas must kill himself.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:12 pm

I've told you what constitutes acceptable evidence to the contrary.

All @Cannonpointer  has to do is count the death certificates...when the count reaches 3, he can shut my account for a month.

Death certificates to what?
 

Cannonpointer » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

58 minutes ago

Implicitly, what you are asking is for me to admit I lied about the many deaths my beloved father suffered.

If I ****-can his account, I am confessing to perjury. You have any idea how many insurance companies are miffed and peeved at me for collecting on my father's deaths?

I might as well just march myself down to the county jail in women's panties again, and demand a cell. Not after last time, my friend. Not after last time. I am DONE with incarceration. 

CASE DISMISSED!

I don't know exactly what you are saying here, but do you have a decision? 

 

lard » Today, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:05 am

Isn't BV also John Edgar Child Groomer?

YES he is BV.
Without being able to post here 100 times per day,  the poor guy would totally lose his ****.
Maybe volunteer himself to become the next FALSE FLAG MASS SHOOTER...?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:34 pm

No...that is GENERALLY true...but I want to see it proven in the PARTICULAR.

I want clear and convincing evidence that this rule applies to you....since we know so many don't.

Nobody cares what you want. You are doing what you always do, reframe. Too late. I proved how your post was flawed. You agreed to it. You posting addionall wants and demands is irrelevant now. Not my problem. You should have thought of that before you agreed. 

Coward. 

Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Nobody cares what you want. You are doing what you always do, reframe. Too late. I proved how your post was flawed. You agreed to it. You posting addionall wants and demands is irrelevant now. Not my problem. You should have thought of that before you agreed. 

Coward.

I care what I want...

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

I care what I want...

Yeah, we know. Trust us. We know how much you care about your own wants. 

So @Cannonpointer  what is the verdict? 

I can give an alternate route to Veghead in lieu of a month ban. He can start an OP claiming that he is my little bitch and that he is the IQ of a toad. I will write it up for him and then he must post it as an OP. 

@Blackvegetable