Where's your evidence?Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Look at this. They are the same audio earrings. Is it really hard to believe that the dims would cheat? Hillary was given the questions before the debate. These mods only fact check Trump, but didn't even make an effort to fact check Harris's incessant lies. They rigged 2020. They are rigging 2024. Now Google is helping. Go ahead and Google this. Type in any combo of words regarding Harris's earrings and the debate. You will see pages and pages of lib sources denying it. Any article addressing the possibility of it is probably on page 4,567,023 where Google planted them.
Have you ever just known something...oh wait. You never have. Never mind.
Look at the photos, you **** idiot.Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Have you ever just known something...oh wait. You never have. Never mind.
Go ahead and try it if you don't believe me. Google whatever combo of words you wish and let me know which page you finally see a non-lib source addressing the possibility of it.
Yes, they are you dumb asshole.
So....****.....stupid.
So no real rebuttal. As always. If you want to see an example of a mistaken identity in pics, then take a look at your VF Trump pic.
YouCan'tHurtHam » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I never really checked anyone else before concluding those are likely just earrings. Harris is too ditzy to try & debate Trump and listen to someone in her ear. She is like a high school girl and has neither the maturity or focus to pull that off.
I hate to say it, but she didn't look horrible in that debate. I am assuming that she really really practiced and got some good coaching. She is also a nervous nelly, so she probably took a sedative or two.
Yes, I totally agree. It is not the job of the debate moderator to help the candidate. When Trump talked about pets in Springfield, it was up the Harris to basically say what the mods said. What the mods did was amateurish and they would not even get away with that in a high school debate competition.Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump was debating three people in that debate. The mods helped her enormously. They didn't fact check her, but fact checked Trump. Trump had to fact check her on multiple occasions which caused him to waste more time than he had. She sounded scripted like she rehearsed for a play or something. Even after all of that, I believe Trump still owned her.
YouCan'tHurtHam » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yes, I totally agree. It is not the job of the debate moderator to help the candidate. When Trump talked about pets in Springfield, it was up the Harris to basically say what the mods said. What the mods did was amateurish and they would not even get away with that in a high school debate competition.
Yes; agreed. I skimmed the debate on jootube, and remember seeing 3-4 moderator interventions. Maybe there was more?
I'll bet your profanities help you win lots and lots of debates.
No...the mounting for the spyware features a single post....now look again at the mounting for Kamala's...Vegas » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So no real rebuttal. As always. If you want to see an example of a mistaken identity in pics, then take a look at your VF Trump pic.
You think facts make any impression?YouCan'tHurtHam » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I'll bet your profanities help you win lots and lots of debates.
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No...the mounting for the spyware features a single post....now look again at the mounting for Kamala's...
**** rube.