Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's not uncommon for Kamaltoe's promises to be contingent on who the audience is at the time.These are just a couple of examples off the top of my head.
- Once she said that she will ban fracking, then later she said she wont. Both audiences were completely different in their ideologies.
- Once she said that she would ban assault weapons, then during the debate she said she wouldn't.
Now she is promising amnesty to 14 million illegals right before the election. She will get her millions and millions of votes because of it. Then, if she follows her MO, after the election she will retract. I wonder what these illegals and the Mexican community will do after they find out that she was just using them.
The levels of Stupid here are staggering.Now she is promising amnesty to 14 million illegals right before the election. She will get her millions and millions of votes because of it. Then, if she follows her MO, after the election she will retract.
Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ The levels of Stupid here are staggering.
Why wasn't the OP smothered in the nursery as required by his toe tag?
They don't care. Getting here was the goal.Vegas » Today, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's not uncommon for Kamaltoe's promises to be contingent on who the audience is at the time.These are just a couple of examples off the top of my head.
- Once she said that she will ban fracking, then later she said she wont. Both audiences were completely different in their ideologies.
- Once she said that she would ban assault weapons, then during the debate she said she wouldn't.
Now she is promising amnesty to 14 million illegals right before the election. She will get her millions and millions of votes because of it. Then, if she follows her MO, after the election she will retract. I wonder what these illegals and the Mexican community will do after they find out that she was just using them.
…..can’t imagine the illegal would want to support the same environment they ran away from.Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's not uncommon for Kamaltoe's promises to be contingent on who the audience is at the time.These are just a couple of examples off the top of my head.
- Once she said that she will ban fracking, then later she said she wont. Both audiences were completely different in their ideologies.
- Once she said that she would ban assault weapons, then during the debate she said she wouldn't.
Now she is promising amnesty to 14 million illegals right before the election. She will get her millions and millions of votes because of it. Then, if she follows her MO, after the election she will retract. I wonder what these illegals and the Mexican community will do after they find out that she was just using them.
Are you challenging me to demonstrate how **** stupid you are?Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ This is why I don't allow you on my PG threads. You don't have the intellectual capacity to refute anything.
Your idea of a rebuttal is:
1. An insult.
2. The same copout
Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you challenging me to demonstrate how **** stupid you are?
Don't evade..Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ This **** again. If I am stupid, then you lost to a stupid person twice.
How many times are you going to fall for that?
Is that a "yes" or a "no", damned pansy?Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑You can't beat me. You aren't smart enough. Hence, 0-2. All you do is copy/paste ****.
You will copy/paste the internet, my posts, and anything else that you can hide behind.
Now go dig through my profile for the next 15 hrs like you always do.
Your thread is ugly...Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑You can't beat me. You aren't smart enough. Hence, 0-2. All you do is copy/paste ****.
You will copy/paste the internet, my posts, and anything else that you can hide behind.
Now go dig through my profile for the next 15 hrs like you always do.
As always, an insult.Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2024, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Your thread is ugly...
Are you just gonna stand there and take that?
As always, evades.Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ As always, an insult.
As always, hides behind a question.
As always, no intelligent thoughts.
As always, QED.
Thank her.Vegas » 13 Oct 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's not uncommon for Kamaltoe's promises to be contingent on who the audience is at the time.These are just a couple of examples off the top of my head.
- Once she said that she will ban fracking, then later she said she wont. Both audiences were completely different in their ideologies.
- Once she said that she would ban assault weapons, then during the debate she said she wouldn't.
Now she is promising amnesty to 14 million illegals right before the election. She will get her millions and millions of votes because of it. Then, if she follows her MO, after the election she will retract. I wonder what these illegals and the Mexican community will do after they find out that she was just using them.
cop outVegas » 13 Oct 2024, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ This is why I don't allow you on my PG threads. You don't have the intellectual capacity to refute anything.
Your idea of a rebuttal is:
1. An insult.
2. The same copout