Explain why you are < positive 1 SD…RebelGator » 29 Oct 2024, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Another offering from the most aptly named poster on the site.
I usually don't understand anything you post.....try harder.LowIQTrash » 29 Oct 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Explain why you are < positive 1 SD…
The class is waiting
Do you even understand the OP? Usually people lash out when their incomprehension overwhelms their feeble mental faculties…if you had a proper rebuttal you would have given it by now.
Nobody with a brain or if they had no other choice would drink tap water.Fuelman » 29 Oct 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ Info:
During calendar year 2020, the number of active PWSs in the U.S. was 148,457. Seventy-four percent of the PWSs active in that year (109,902) had no reported violations of drinking water standards. Twenty-six percent (38,472) of PWSs were reported to have violated at least one drinking water standard in 2020.Sep 24, 2024
Not sure if raising the standards would change this much.
I haven't drank tap water for over 25 years.