
Media Research Center?ROG62 » 29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ STUDY: Networks Deliver Massive Media Honeymoon to Kamala Harris...
Since Joe Biden exited the 2024 presidential race four weeks ago, the liberal networks have delivered an unprecedented boost of positive publicity to his successor in the race, Vice President Kamala Harris. Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative)...
https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-n ... ala-harris
If they are such an unreliable source that simply seeing them linked makes you laugh, it should be easy for you to post a link from a more reliable source refuting their numbers.
Do you have any idea who they are....or have been....for, like, 40 years?ConsRule » 29 Oct 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ If they are such an unreliable source that simply seeing them linked makes you laugh, it should be easy for you to post a link from a more reliable source refuting their numbers.
We'll wait (UHFO)
Natch.....very objective....it should be easy for you to post a link from a more reliable source refuting their numbers.
Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ Do you have any idea who they are....or have been....for, like, 40 years?
Natch.....very objective....
You're a **** idiot.
Post your number.....
I've posted my definition....
You mean the [[[JWO]]] who control 96% of the MSM and the Democrat Party...?Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ Do you have any idea who they are....or have been....for, like, 40 years?
Natch.....very objective....
You're a **** idiot.
Yes. They are a right to far right media outlet. If memory serves me correctly, one of the founders was Buckley. But that is irrelevant to my previous post. If they are so unreliable that the mere sight of their name makes you laugh, you should be able to easily post a link from a more reliable source refuting their numbers. However, make certain your source isn't as far left as they are far right.Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ Do you have any idea who they are....or have been....for, like, 40 years?
Natch.....very objective....
You're a **** idiot.
ConsRule » 29 Oct 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Yes. They are a right to far right media outlet. If memory serves me correctly, one of the founders was Buckley. But that is irrelevant to my previous post. If they are so unreliable that the mere sight of their name makes you laugh, you should be able to easily post a link from a more reliable source refuting their numbers. However, make certain your source isn't as far left as they are far right.
SCORECARD
BV questions asked = 4 Questions answered by ConsRule = 4
ConsRule questions asked = 3 Questions answered by BV = 1
Of course they are.....they ARE reliably hyperbolic, however.They are a right to far right media outlet. ........ If they are so unreliable
It must be wonderful to live in your Magic Fairy World where you have accomplished all of these things that nobody else has ever seen you do.Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ I've posted my definition....
Duck had to consult a dictionary....
I link you to the post, and you shoot yourself on Instagram...GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Oct 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ It must be wonderful to live in your Magic Fairy World where you have accomplished all of these things that nobody else has ever seen you do.
Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ I link you to the post, and you shoot yourself on Instagram...
Deal?
You had to refer to a dictionary.....
Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ You had to refer to a dictionary.....
Because, you're a virgin.......
It must be wonderful to live in your Magic Fairy World where you have accomplished all of these things that nobody else has ever seen you do.Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ I link you to the post, and you shoot yourself on Instagram...
Deal?
A) There's a good reason you didn't see a question. I didn't ask one in this thread.Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ Of course they are.....they ARE reliably hyperbolic, however.
A) I didn't see a question
B) You should stop demanding **** from me.