Liberal Forum

ConsRule » 29 Oct 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 10:00 am

A) There's a good reason you didn't see a question.  I didn't ask one in this thread.

B) I'll "demand" anything I **** want to demand.  If you don't like it you can...

       GET
-----------------
YOURSELF

ROG62 » 29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am

STUDY: Networks Deliver Massive Media Honeymoon to Kamala Harris...
Since Joe Biden exited the 2024 presidential race four weeks ago, the liberal networks have delivered an unprecedented boost of positive publicity to his successor in the race, Vice President Kamala Harris. Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative)...

https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-n ... ala-harris

In memory of Pumpkins

Jantje_Smit » 29 Oct 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 10:07 am

Speaking of MSLSD, even CNNLOL knows...

 

https://youtu.be/NDWOZfrcS1o

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

ROG62 » 29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am

STUDY: Networks Deliver Massive Media Honeymoon to Kamala Harris...
Since Joe Biden exited the 2024 presidential race four weeks ago, the liberal networks have delivered an unprecedented boost of positive publicity to his successor in the race, Vice President Kamala Harris. Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative)...

https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-n ... ala-harris


 

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 9:11 am

Media Research Center?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Oct 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 9:41 am

WE GOT A RUNNER...!

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 9:11 am

Media Research Center?

 

 

*Huey » 29 Oct 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 11:19 am

That's funny.  Calling out a conservative group for calling out a progressive group.

ROG62 » 29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 8:43 am

STUDY: Networks Deliver Massive Media Honeymoon to Kamala Harris...
Since Joe Biden exited the 2024 presidential race four weeks ago, the liberal networks have delivered an unprecedented boost of positive publicity to his successor in the race, Vice President Kamala Harris. Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative)...

https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-n ... ala-harris

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 12:02 pm

Another moronic "observation".

These "media conspiracies" are MRC's bread&butter.


 

 

*Huey » 29 Oct 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 12:25 pm

The difference between you and I is I can see the biases in both groups, media or otherwise.  You defend what supports your ideology.

You defend what supports your ideology.

I repeat slogans.

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 12:31 pm

400 minutes EVERY WEEK of distilled propaganda..


Are these your words?

 

*Huey » 29 Oct 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 12:39 pm

Actually, only 200.  One is a late night comedy show.  SInce you watch neither you have no clue about them.

They could be my words.  But  you have no context.  And no link.  I wonder why.....

One is a late night comedy show

They could be my words.  But  you have no context.  And no link.  I wonder why.....

FJB » 29 Oct 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 9:58 am

still NO definition from you

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm

Hosted by which The Five regular?

A) Those words don't need context

B) They are verbatim, not retold.

 

Beakman » 29 Oct 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 1:11 pm

My Mama been suckin!      
@FJB

*Huey » 29 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm

As far as your question, do your own work.
Verbatim does not necessarily mean in context.  So, when you provide a link to the post we can talk about about.

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 2:08 pm

Run.


 

 

you no speakee

*Huey » 29 Oct 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 2:10 pm

Are those your words....

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 2:14 pm

That's entirely possible...but it's not a complete sentence...

"I repeat slogans." is.