Leftist Women Shave Their Heads in Protest of Trump Victory: ‘F**k Being Hot,’ That’s What the ‘Patriarchy’ Wants Breitbart by Hannah Knudsen 8 Nov 2024
Some leftist women are inexplicably shaving their heads in protest of President-elect Donald Trump’s decisive victory.These distraught women, sharing their hysterical videos to social media, claim to be shaving their heads in protest the “patriarchy,” despite the fact that millions of American women voted for Trump.In one video, a woman in a purple shirt states that she is “giving up on America,” making the statement while shaving the side of her head. She concludes during her rant that basic beauty standards should be completely forgotten, because that is what the “patriarchy” wants.“**** coloring our hair. **** having my hair be long and luxurious. **** all that ****. **** being skinny. **** being hot. **** being all the things that the patriarchy wants us to be, because clearly, they don’t give a **** about us,” she concluded, informing men that she will not be speaking to them.
Are we supposed to be upset that ignorant radical far-left ugly bitches won't be pro-creating more dumb liberals any time soon?Liberal Women Announce Abstinence Campaign Following Trump Win
Breitbart by Olivia Rondeau 8 Nov 2024
Anti-Trump women have taken to social media to take a vow of abstinence — swearing off sex and dating men — after the former president became the president-elect once again on Tuesday. Apparently they see it as another way to “combat the patriarchy,” as leftists like to say. Many videos uploaded to TikTok shortly after the election referenced the “4B Movement,” a Korean radical feminist movement with tenets that go against dating men, marrying men, having sex with men, and having children.“All I have to say is, good luck getting laid. Especially in Florida, because me and my girlies are participating in the 4B movement. That’s my next plan, and I’m dead **** serious,” a TikToker named Brielle with over 357,000 followers said in one video:
Hang Mike Pence!Zeets2 » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ Isn't this hysterical?
As if female Democrats aren't ugly enough to start with!
Are we supposed to be upset that ignorant radical far-left ugly bitches won't be pro-creating more dumb liberals any time soon?
I cheer them on and wish them great success in their effort!
And it sounds like a great time for the rest of us to invest in vibrators and dildoes!
Cry all you want, dickhead!
That was YOUR cry, Cretin.Zeets2 » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Cry all you want, dickhead!
Apparently, it's going to be much tougher for dumb Democrats like you to get laid for the next 4 years, as if you had any chance even before Tuesday!
Was it?
If trumps vp can take over in four years it may be a lot longer than that.Zeets2 » Yesterday, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Cry all you want, dickhead!
Apparently, it's going to be much tougher for dumb Democrats like you to get laid for the next 4 years, as if you had any chance even before Tuesday!
You got any @Blackvegetable videos? He is off the deep end.Zeets2 » Yesterday, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Isn't this hysterical?
As if female Democrats aren't ugly enough to start with!
Are we supposed to be upset that ignorant radical far-left ugly bitches won't be pro-creating more dumb liberals any time soon?
I cheer them on and wish them great success in their effort!
And it sounds like a great time for the rest of us to invest in vibrators and dildoes!
Runny?
No.
Shallow minds believing there is no universal point of balancing outcomes core of series parallel time never think beyond anything else is possible to discover how deep eternity lasts ancestrally here so far.Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Isn't this hysterical?
As if female Democrats aren't ugly enough to start with!
Are we supposed to be upset that ignorant radical far-left ugly bitches won't be pro-creating more dumb liberals any time soon?
I cheer them on and wish them great success in their effort!
And it sounds like a great time for the rest of us to invest in vibrators and dildoes! :rofl:
The country provided all of the "balancing outcome" necessary last Tuesday!31stArrival » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Shallow minds believing there is no universal point of balancing outcomes core of series parallel time never think beyond anything else is possible to discover how deep eternity lasts ancestrally here so far.
inaccurate as usual. You are discussing things divided between results past, currently never same details again, new outcomes between heartbeats never duplicated combining what is existing forward now as a whole is equal to total sum of all its parts specifically universally here, now.Zeets2 » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The country provided all of the "balancing outcome" necessary last Tuesday!
And we'll let "eternity" take care of itself!
Well yeah, we tend to abide by "results past" in an election, like those passed on Tuesday.31stArrival » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ inaccurate as usual. You are discussing things divided between results past, currently never same details again, new outcomes between heartbeats never duplicated combining what is existing forward now as a whole is equal to total sum of all its parts specifically universally here, now.