Liberal Forum

The public thinks Democrats are worse and the Republican Party means stability/prosperity
 This will be corrected shortly

It's worth wondering how we lost alternative media. As recently as Obama almost all the media that young people consumed was wildly pro-liberal.

[The Young Turks] TYT, MR, Kulinsky, Hasan, and other liberal / progressive YouTubers just shat on Dems all day

Meanwhile the conservative / MAGA YouTubers are all very pro-Trump / Republicans

If even the liberal content creators despise the Dems we’re ****

Destiny is our last hope.

Because eggs are expensive.

I actually don't think it's the national Democrats who are the biggest problem. Democrats who run cities at the local have allowed NIMBYism in the party to fester in order to appease homeowners, driving up the cost of housing. This makes life untenable for the working class, and their distrust of national dems on the economy reflects this. Anyone who has to commute 2 hours to their job in the city because housing is too expensive close by believes that Democrats represent elite homeowners.

LowIQTrash » Today, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:26 pm

 

Is the first comment some kind of empty threat?    

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:04 pm

Is the first comment some kind of empty threat?  

Just a prediction

If my readings are accurate…a very salient one in fact

Not that Harris winning would change the outcome, it’s like I said and you agreed…the poison pill is taken


 

LowIQTrash » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Just a prediction

If my readings are accurate…a very salient one in fact

Not that Harris winning would change the outcome, it’s like I said and you agreed…the poison pill is taken

Sorry, but I'm not sure which thing I agreed to poison pill-wise. Need a reminder.
A Trump win can make some difference vs Harris pabulum-policy.
World leaders see a change worthy of a fresh approach.
If they see a difference, then there's a difference. What I think matters not.

I read a lot of posts doing spell checks and stuff. So, I get lost in the miasma.   

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:04 pm

Is the first comment some kind of empty threat?  

No. That idiot is basically saying the entire economy will crash, etc.. because of Trump. Newsflash to that **** liberal… the economy is already ****. 

DeezerShoove » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Sorry, but I'm not sure which thing I agreed to poison pill-wise. Need a reminder.
A Trump win can make some difference vs Harris pabulum-policy.
World leaders see a change worthy of a fresh approach.
If they see a difference, then there's a difference. What I think matters not.

I read a lot of posts doing spell checks and stuff. So, I get lost in the miasma. 

I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible

The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame

Here’s another subtle detail:

Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating” 

If something looks too good to be true…

(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)

We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you     
 
 

LowIQTrash » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible

The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame

Here’s another subtle detail:

Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating” 

If something looks too good to be true…

(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)

We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you   

I'm not going to bet against what I think is a very clever theory  you've got here.
If Trump ends up presiding over the worst economic collapse since Hoover...that ought to hurt the future chances of a Republican getting elected for the next few cycles and allow the [[[JWO]]] Illegal Alien Mass Importation Agenda to hit warp speed well into the 2030s
 

LowIQTrash » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible

The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame

Here’s another subtle detail:

Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating” 

If something looks too good to be true…

(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)

We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you   

Except for one humongous detail....
Kamala didn't want to do it in the first place .....
She was literally thrown into the position ...of running against Trump ....because at that point they knew they couldn't cheat enough to affect the outcome ....and no other "suitable"......meaning they have no legitimate contenders .....because they are all tainted by extreme left Bias......
and America can't stand the Extreme left ...as it is...

 
 

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:02 pm

I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible

The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame

Here’s another subtle detail:

Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating” 

If something looks too good to be true…

(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)

We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you   

I remember that. And I still think it's plausible.
As it is, who cannot foresee some very real problems coming up?
Whether or not they threw the election purposely or merely now see it as a mixed blessing...
that's a good question.

Thanks for the reminder.

GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:22 pm

I'm not going to bet against what I think is a very clever theory  you've got here.
If Trump ends up presiding over the worst economic collapse since Hoover...that ought to hurt the future chances of a Republican getting elected for the next few cycles and allow the [[[JWO]]] Illegal Alien Mass Importation Agenda to hit warp speed well into the 2030s

I can already see R “Eggplant” Suave will be the one gloating…


The US was destined for this fate long ago.

Too much private debt chasing ever fewer dollars that require interest AKA (((usury))) = how the THFC “relieve” the GoyiM of their property every so often    .

Jefferson warned Americans about the dangers of (((private banking)))

The fact that trillions have been printed by the (((Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers))) is irrelevant because most of that money never finds its way into the “real economy.”

However it does end up inflating housing prices and worms its way into the Wall St casino 

 

 

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:02 pm

I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible

The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame

Here’s another subtle detail:

Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating” 

If something looks too good to be true…

(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)

We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you   

It's about time you realized that liberals and Democrats NEVER take the blame for ANYTHING!

What you fail (or refuse) to address is the far more likelihood that Trump succeeds tremendously and the reaction to that by Democrats (and most libs like you) will be the idiotic attempt to claim that Biden, not Trump deserves the credit for the rebound, with some **** that sounds like, "he put in place the policies that improved the country, and it just took too long to be noticed".  

Isn't THAT the same **** they tried to float in Trump's last term when the economy soared, ISIS was destroyed, unemployment records were smashed, millions were raised out of poverty, and the country enjoyed a mostly peaceful 4 years?  The lie THEN was, "Oh, Obama's great leadership brought us out of the recession (despite the fact that he CAUSED the "great" depression and the slowest recovery in history) and Trump was the beneficiary of his policies", was it not?

So, you're damn RIGHT we'll "revisit this in due time"!
But that won't be a time for you to congratulate yourself for your foresight.
It will be a time for Democrats to lie, pout, and revile Trump even more than they do now!

I guarantee it!

LowIQTrash » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

I can already see R “Eggplant” Suave will be the one gloating…he will have to be patient in the meantime but assuming he is here in 2026…

The US was destined for this fate long ago.

Too much private debt chasing ever fewer dollars that require interest AKA (((usury))) = how the THFC “relieve” the GoyiM of their property every so often    .

Jefferson warned Americans about the dangers of (((private banking))) and (((enslavement))). 

The fact that trillions have been printed by the (((Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers))) is irrelevant because most of that money never finds its way into the “real economy.”

However it does end up inflating housing prices and worms its way into the Wall St casino 

Team Trump is aware of this situation and so  they need to use their social media outlets to get the word out [in a tactful way] to those who are willing to listen.
 

LowIQTrash » 09 Nov 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 1:26 pm

If you don't like being stereotyped, stop typecasting others to make yourself feel larger than equally adapting in space daily since concieved to replace your own previous generation gaps lived so far in series parallel positions daily.

Zeets2 » Today, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:48 am

It's about time you realized that liberals and Democrats NEVER take the blame for ANYTHING!

What you fail (or refuse) to address is the far more likelihood that Trump succeeds tremendously and the reaction to that by Democrats (and most libs like you) will be the idiotic attempt to claim that Biden, not Trump deserves the credit for the rebound, with some **** that sounds like, "he put in place the policies that improved the country, and it just took too long to be noticed".  

Isn't THAT the same **** they tried to float in Trump's last term when the economy soared, ISIS was destroyed, unemployment records were smashed, millions were raised out of poverty, and the country enjoyed a mostly peaceful 4 years?  The lie THEN was, "Oh, Obama's great leadership brought us out of the recession (despite the fact that he CAUSED the "great" depression and the slowest recovery in history) and Trump was the beneficiary of his policies", was it not?

So, you're damn RIGHT we'll "revisit this in due time"!
But that won't be a time for you to congratulate yourself for your foresight.
It will be a time for Democrats to lie, pout, and revile Trump even more than they do now!

I guarantee it!
 

You are so full of it! Obama didn't cause the great depression, Dubya caused it and maobama got stuck with dealing with it. And it cost me my career as a loan officer!
 

Beakman » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

You are so full of it! Obama didn't cause the great depression, Dubya caused it and maobama got stuck with dealing with it. And it cost me my career as a loan officer!

You sound pretty pissed off about it, but it's time you learned to put the blame where it belongs!
And here are the facts:

The economy was already in a recession when Obama took over.  There is no argument about that.
The reality, however, is the fact that we were NOT in what was called the GREAT recession until that idiot was elected and proceeded to cause a sharp downturn that MADE the recession GREAT, and he caused us to suffer through the longest "recovery" period in US history ALL DUE TO HIS IDIOTIC POLICIES!  
Need more proof?
Find me JUST ONE journalist, political pundit, or politician who EVER claimed we were in a "GREAT" recession PRIOR TO OBAMA'S NOVEMBER ELECTION!
Look at the total number of job losses that occurred RIGHT AFTER HIS ELECTION, and continued on through the first half of 2009.  This was a direct result of his promises to raise taxes and regulations on "the rich", bring us mandated universal healthcare, (remember, 'you can keep your doctor lies'?) while making his disdain of small business ownership perfectly clear with such stupid comments as, "you didn't build that", and the socialist mantra of "we're going to spread that wealth around" and Republicans can just "sit in the back of the car while we drive it"!  

I know EXACTLY how those promises affect me in my business, and as such I took drastic steps that I deemed necessary to survive his coming onslaught, just as millions of other business owners did!  I laid off workers, eliminated all overtime, canceled all R&D and put a hold on a new product line that I was producing.  I slashed inventory, and canceled an order for new machinery I had just placed the previous month, knowing full well the kind of deep recession that we were facing.  In my communication with both my customers and other business owners that I was acquainted with, those that could WERE ALL DOING THE EXACT SAME THING!  And THAT, my liberal friend, is why we lost MILLIONS of jobs starting the minute Obama was elected, apparently in just the same way as your job was eliminated.  Care to share with me further proof of my belief by telling me exactly WHEN your job was cut?  Because I'm guessing it was likely lost within 3 months of Obama's election victory, right?

Naturally, all your left-wing fake news media sources bent over backwards to convince you that this was all the fault of GW Bush, because they could NOT let America's first black president be responsible for ANY of the problems he himself had caused.

And foolish liberal Democrats like you happily swallowed that ****, instead of believing the words of people like myself who were forced to take drastic action to survive his socialist policies.  Unlike millions of other small businesses who went bankrupt, I survived BECAUSE of those austere measures I took, and my business thrived as soon as your socialist idiot left office and the Trump economy surged. 

So please, PUT THE BLAME WHERE IT BELONGS!!!
 

Zeets2 » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

You sound pretty pissed off about it, but it's time you learned to put the blame where it belongs!
And here are the facts:

The economy was already in a recession when Obama took over.  There is no argument about that.
The reality, however, is the fact that we were NOT in what was called the GREAT recession until that idiot was elected and proceeded to cause a sharp downturn that MADE the recession GREAT, and he caused us to suffer through the longest "recovery" period in US history ALL DUE TO HIS IDIOTIC POLICIES!  
Need more proof?
Find me JUST ONE journalist, political pundit, or politician who EVER claimed we were in a "GREAT" recession PRIOR TO OBAMA'S NOVEMBER ELECTION!
Look at the total number of job losses that occurred RIGHT AFTER HIS ELECTION, and continued on through the first half of 2009.  This was a direct result of his promises to raise taxes and regulations on "the rich", bring us mandated universal healthcare, (remember, 'you can keep your doctor lies'?) while making his disdain of small business ownership perfectly clear with such stupid comments as, "you didn't build that", and the socialist mantra of "we're going to spread that wealth around" and Republicans can just "sit in the back of the car while we drive it"!  

I know EXACTLY how those promises affect me in my business, and as such I took drastic steps that I deemed necessary to survive his coming onslaught, just as millions of other business owners did!  I laid off workers, eliminated all overtime, canceled all R&D and put a hold on a new product line that I was producing.  I slashed inventory, and canceled an order for new machinery I had just placed the previous month, knowing full well the kind of deep recession that we were facing.  In my communication with both my customers and other business owners that I was acquainted with, those that could WERE ALL DOING THE EXACT SAME THING!  And THAT, my liberal friend, is why we lost MILLIONS of jobs starting the minute Obama was elected, apparently in just the same way as your job was eliminated.  Care to share with me further proof of my belief by telling me exactly WHEN your job was cut?  Because I'm guessing it was likely lost within 3 months of Obama's election victory, right?

Naturally, all your left-wing fake news media sources bent over backwards to convince you that this was all the fault of GW Bush, because they could NOT let America's first black president be responsible for ANY of the problems he himself had caused.

And foolish liberal Democrats like you happily swallowed that ****, instead of believing the words of people like myself who were forced to take drastic action to survive his socialist policies.  Unlike millions of other small businesses who went bankrupt, I survived BECAUSE of those austere measures I took, and my business thrived as soon as your socialist idiot left office and the Trump economy surged. 

So please, PUT THE BLAME WHERE IT BELONGS!!!
 

I am not well lately, too sick to discuss.Almost died laST night!

Beakman » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I am not well lately, too sick to discuss.Almost died laST night!

One of the symptoms of Trump Derangement Syndrome no doubt.
Get better, and we can resume in a week when I return from vacation.
 

Zeets2 » Today, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:34 am

You sound pretty pissed off about it, but it's time you learned to put the blame where it belongs!
And here are the facts:

The economy was already in a recession when Obama took over.  There is no argument about that.
The reality, however, is the fact that we were NOT in what was called the GREAT recession until that idiot was elected and proceeded to cause a sharp downturn that MADE the recession GREAT, and he caused us to suffer through the longest "recovery" period in US history ALL DUE TO HIS IDIOTIC POLICIES!  
Need more proof?
Find me JUST ONE journalist, political pundit, or politician who EVER claimed we were in a "GREAT" recession PRIOR TO OBAMA'S NOVEMBER ELECTION!
Look at the total number of job losses that occurred RIGHT AFTER HIS ELECTION, and continued on through the first half of 2009.  This was a direct result of his promises to raise taxes and regulations on "the rich", bring us mandated universal healthcare, (remember, 'you can keep your doctor lies'?) while making his disdain of small business ownership perfectly clear with such stupid comments as, "you didn't build that", and the socialist mantra of "we're going to spread that wealth around" and Republicans can just "sit in the back of the car while we drive it"!  

I know EXACTLY how those promises affect me in my business, and as such I took drastic steps that I deemed necessary to survive his coming onslaught, just as millions of other business owners did!  I laid off workers, eliminated all overtime, canceled all R&D and put a hold on a new product line that I was producing.  I slashed inventory, and canceled an order for new machinery I had just placed the previous month, knowing full well the kind of deep recession that we were facing.  In my communication with both my customers and other business owners that I was acquainted with, those that could WERE ALL DOING THE EXACT SAME THING!  And THAT, my liberal friend, is why we lost MILLIONS of jobs starting the minute Obama was elected, apparently in just the same way as your job was eliminated.  Care to share with me further proof of my belief by telling me exactly WHEN your job was cut?  Because I'm guessing it was likely lost within 3 months of Obama's election victory, right?

Naturally, all your left-wing fake news media sources bent over backwards to convince you that this was all the fault of GW Bush, because they could NOT let America's first black president be responsible for ANY of the problems he himself had caused.

And foolish liberal Democrats like you happily swallowed that ****, instead of believing the words of people like myself who were forced to take drastic action to survive his socialist policies.  Unlike millions of other small businesses who went bankrupt, I survived BECAUSE of those austere measures I took, and my business thrived as soon as your socialist idiot left office and the Trump economy surged. 

So please, PUT THE BLAME WHERE IT BELONGS!!!
 

The ancestries of this species have done the corruption upon themselves. I have put the blame where it originates daily. Evolving sustains balance between extremes and intellectual minds operate creating extreme oppositions among people agreeing to disagree daily transferred to next generations every day.

I just watched about 4 minutes of Rachael Maddow...

How the **** that idiot is still popular with ANYBODY is amazing.
Democracy just about ended.
Only libs can save the country.
USA is the only multicultural country on Earth.
There was other profundities that I missed... 

​​​​​​​I feel like Woody Harrelson after he "paid rent" in Kingpin.

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:02 pm

I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible

The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame

Here’s another subtle detail:

Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating” 

If something looks too good to be true…

(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)

We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you   

Hillary threw a tantrum because it was her one shot and she knew she could screw/bj her way to another chance...Kameltoe on the other hand.........