:rofl:Majik » 14 Nov 2024, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ Since Trump's win people are lining up to invest in a Trump lead America....
here is a good example ...
Indian tycoon to invest $10bn in US economy following Trump win
Billionaire Gautam Adani has pledged to create jobs for thousands of Americans
https://www.rt.com/india/607620-indian- ... invest-us/
@Blackvegetable
YOU PIECE OF ****.....
Majik » 14 Nov 2024, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ Since Trump's win people are lining up to invest in a Trump lead America....
here is a good example ...
Indian tycoon to invest $10bn in US economy following Trump win
Billionaire Gautam Adani has pledged to create jobs for thousands of Americans
https://www.rt.com/india/607620-indian- ... invest-us/
@Blackvegetable
YOU PIECE OF ****.....
Can't wait until trump is under ground.
If that happens in next 4 years. You had better buckle up bitch boiSquatchman » 14 Nov 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Can't wait until trump is under ground.
His grave will be known as the National Urinal.
Hopefully it's like in 1 year.FJB » 14 Nov 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ If that happens in next 4 years. You had better buckle up bitch boi
How wiil you know?nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Biden Harris economics in reverse.....progress Trump style.....MAGA is real
No, The Morons voted for Kamala ....
Data Accuracy is one of the so-called “dimensions” of Data Quality. The goal for these dimensions, and it is a noble one, is so we can measure each of them, and should deficiencies be found then there should be a uniform set of best practices that we can implement. Of course, these best practices will differ from dimension to dimension. But just how feasible is this for Data Accuracy?In this blog, we start by looking at the definition of accuracy in general. Wikipedia provides a commonly accepted definition, which is:“The degree of closeness of measurements of a quantity to that quantity’s true value.”The word “true” is very important and needs to be understood so we can understand accuracy. Truth was defined by Aristotle in a way that highlights the relation between a representation and the reality that the representation is trying to represent. That seems to be very much connected with Data Accuracy.We give the definition of Data Accuracy as:“The degree to which a data value represents what it purports to represent.”One of the problems of the dimensions of Data Quality is that there are differences of opinion about how it should be defined. No doubt our definition can be improved, but we will take it as a basis for exploring how we should estimate Data Accuracy.The next thing we must consider is that Data Accuracy is impossible to achieve with 100% accuracy for observations. Two great minds in Quality Control provide a basis for this understanding. Walter A. Shewhart pointed out that all systems of measurement introduce error. W. Edwards Deming, who was taught by Shewhart, went further, and pointed out that there is “no true value of anything.” So, it seems we can never get 100% Data Accuracy. If this is the case, we will want to know how we can assess Data Accuracy, since we will want to know just how imperfect it is. And this is where we run into another hard truth, which is that was cannot do this just by considering the data alone. This is potentially a difficulty for data professionals. We are used to working with data and like to work with it. But to estimate Data Quality, we will need to step outside the data, figure out a method to independently assess a sample of the population we are interested in for the data values in question and compare that with the data under curation. It just cannot be done from entirely within the data itself. Of course, the way we assess Data Accuracy is likely to vary from data element to data element.There is one exception to this, which is where data is itself the managed reality. In these cases, the data is not based on observations of something outside itself. Anything dematerialized, like a bank account is included in this category. In the database that actively manages a bank account, then the data is a reality. However, if we look at bank accounts and try to, say, capture their balances, then we are making observations and we are back to normal data. We will explore this distinction more in the future.So those are a couple of hard truths about Data Accuracy: for data based on observations, it is impossible to achieve it completely, and we cannot estimate it just by looking at dataBlackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ How wiil you know?
Remember, you not only dismiss data, you're also innumerate.
Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ How wiil you know?
Remember, you not only dismiss data, you're also innumerate.
It's not gonna be measured in units of Yuge.nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead....
Sure do like watching your ******* twisting in the wind over your Chronic TDS.....you all are powerless now and there is not one damn thing you can do about it....except cry like a 2nd grade girl.
We get to watch you cry again for 4 or more years......In your case I suspect you got a bad case of diaper rash too
Here....remember the love...nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Hey dickhead....
I need to get a bigger salt shaker to catch all the progressive democratic's tears.....just love to watch all the crying and meltdowns.
See....you all should have left the little children alone......Progressive Democratics and ALL their supporters should not have tried to legalize pedophilia.
You didn't by chance vote for Harris did you?
Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Here....remember the love...
https://www.youtube.com/live/18MGmFeEGG ... q6IlYgnZas
Tiny,*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ This is 2024. You remember this love:
312 Electoral College Votes. Mandate.
Won the popular vote. Mandate.
Flipped the Senate. Mandate.
Kept control of the House. Mandate.
Not bad for the guy one egghead survey called worse than Buchanan.
brown claims to be a republican…nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Hey dickhead....
I need to get a bigger salt shaker to catch all the progressive democratic's tears.....just love to watch all the crying and meltdowns.
See....you all should have left the little children alone......Progressive Democratics and ALL their supporters should not have tried to legalize pedophilia.
You didn't by chance vote for Harris did you?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
It's ended in heartbreak since 1989..
Grifty didn't get better, and it is clear that he hasn't become a magnet for talent.
Remember, I'm the guy who has only voted for presidents who bequeathed smaller deficits to his successor than what he inherited.
Simply because he voted for Ford.